> Off Topic Discussions

dress code

<< < (3/3)

rumpelstiltskin:
So did I Longhorn!!
I thought it was Hilarious when Ray talks about men not wearing panties and make up (although he didn't meation nipple chainletts and weird bondage apparatuses). But any way putting lascivious aside, It was those lines of Rays why I posted it in off topic light hearted banter section and only added Rays responce.It wasn't about the actual email topic. By the way thankyou John from Kentucky, you were the only one who seemed to get the post.

Samson:

--- Quote from: T.G.N on May 09, 2011, 04:18:59 PM ---OK, I called the topic "dress code" because that was the name of the email. As I said I was not even commenting on the actual email topic anyway! The post was put in the off topic section for light hearted banter, and I was taking a shot at Ray for not being with the times (in my opinion) MY POST HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING SCRIPTUAL!. I don't give a damn what people wear, its not even the point!


--- End quote ---


TGN,

I apologize if My response offended You. It's true that Off Topic Discussions are for Fun & Banter, but it isn't limited to that, as you must have noticed by previous Threads of the past. I reviewed Your initial Post and saw no indication of any Humor. Perhaps, it's because I don't have much of a sense of Humor & rarely detect Dry Humor. Personally, I don't interpret the criteria of the intended purpose of each Forum section, ie- General Discussions, Off Topic, Testimonies, etc in a "Legalistic" manner, although in regards to General Discussions, I try to keep it close. As an illustration regarding a "Legalistic" view. A Forum rule disallowing Teaching at General Discussions is primarily referring to " A Teaching," not the explaining of information that We learned from the material gleaned from Ray & other information in harmony with this information. Teaching in the sense of helping others learn information contained here is different than someone bringing " A Teaching." I'm quite certain that the Moderators recognize this and "some" Moderators have informed Me on a personal level that they make every effort to avoid being Legalistic or overly Dogmatic, so as to avoid being like Jehovah's Witnesses or like one of the Worldwide Church of God Splinter Groups.

                   Otherwise, My apologies, Samson.

rumpelstiltskin:
Hello sampson
You have absolutly nothing to apologize for, I am in no way offended by your post, Im not even offended by Noeleena's. God know's I had no intention of offending anyone and apologize myself if I did, but water of a ducks back. I thought your post was good sampson.   
 Peace

rumpelstiltskin:
I just thought of something; Now thanks to me (T.G.N) the phrases "nipple chainlettes" and "bondage apparatuses" is going to be in the bibletruths forum search engine! Sorry forum sorry moderaters.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page