> General Discussions
New article: "Solving The Enigma Of God" just posted.
Gina:
gk, we don't need the mind of Ray, we need the mind of Jesus Christ. I wasn't picking on you. I think you're a wonderful person. I'm glad for your post. Once again, God provides for me.
servias:
This whole thread is an Enigma! I do not think any of this is explainable. That's why it is an enigma and probably can't be solved on paper. It can probably only be solved in spirit. Opinions should be kept to a minimum on this in my opinion ;D. More scripture, less opinion...In the end we will all probably agree that we can't solve it collectively.
Gina:
But the Name of God and God's relationship to the Son has been solved for me in a way I never dreamed possible. That's all that was going on here.
God provides. And this first installment has been a major gift to me.
I am researching a paper on "Solving the Enigma of God." But as it is somewhere in the future, I decided to cover some of the shorter enigmas that will prepare us for a deeper understanding of just Who our God really is. So this paper is one of those related Biblical Enigmas.
Are we going to have a deeper understanding (not a complete understanding, but definitely a deeper one) of just Who our God really is? I believe a few will.
God is a RICH provider/supplier of needs for anyone willing to believe this.
But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus. (Phil. 4:19)
Revilonivek:
Dear, Indianabob-
Thank you for your advice. I will certainly take that to heart. I need to mind my manners and it only takes a few minutes to correct, revise and post. Sometimes when I've written for so long and so often, as writing is my primary method of communication with other hearing people, I start to get lazy about checking my grammar every time I write. Again, thank you for your reminder and I appreciate your generosity in your words. I will try to do better from now on.
Thank you again,
Denise
Revilonivek:
--- Quote from: mharrell08 on June 23, 2012, 03:48:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Revilonivek on June 23, 2012, 02:42:07 PM ---Dennis-
In earlier conversation, I was only suggesting what if because The Father and Son has the same name. Jehovah and Jesus. I assumed maybe they are the same essence of the same being- Father - invisible- The son- flesh version- More like a clone twin of each other that just split. in essence, the same being. if you get my meaning? But Gina pointed out it is more like Father and son family thing, like Smith and son, Jennings and son, Vogel and son, everyone in the same family has the same last name. So whenever we join the Father's family- we carry his name. we become one family with them. Like son come out of the mother, same sense. I understand that now.
Am i on the right track?
Denise-
--- End quote ---
Yes, I would agree Denise.
Rev 3:12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name.
--- End quote ---
Dear Marques,
Thank you for showing me that particular scripture. I never really noticed that part in the same verse where Jesus said about giving us God's name once we conquer ourselves till now. It was really something. It is just another confirmation that God's name is just a family name. I had that verse on the brain in the past because Jesus said, in the same verse, that we will no more go out if we overcome ourselves". I always wondered what he meant by that. I mean, where would we go if we don't overcome ourselves and until when we do overcome ourselves? but that's for another thread. Thank you so much for that scripture, as it adds to and confirms further among many other confirmations that God's name is just a family name and God wants everyone to adopted into one family and carry the family name. It freed my soul even more. Thank you Marques.
Denise
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version