> General Discussions
are there any discussions on why the "fall"was allowed
eagle:
Hi Mark
--- Quote ---eagle,the flaming sword is Jesus Christ.
If fire is judgement and the sword is Gods Word then by Scriptural definition the flaming sword is Jesus,and not what Mr.Strong in his unscriptural definition describes in your post eagle. Calling the flaming sword an enchantment or imaginary figure is by Scriptual definition... wrong.
--- End quote ---
Now Youīre talking :) Thatīs all I hoped for.
--- Quote ---Now to your slander eagle.
--- End quote ---
Nothing in my post has anything to do with slander.
Slander is defined here http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/slander
as 1.defamation
2.a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
I never did that to you, and would never even think of doing it to you or anyone else for that matter. I do not know anything about you or your character/good name
I just adressed your action.
--- Quote ---Have you even read any of Rays material?
--- End quote ---
Yes I have, and agreed with all of it first time I read it, how can you not :)
--- Quote ---May I ask how me posting a few of Rays answers on the proper use of the Strong's concordance makes me out to be a rebuking snake?
--- End quote ---
I absolutely did not call you a rebuking snake. I said "your snakelike attempt" That statement speaks of a one time action.
In love
Eagle
eagle:
Hi Kat
--- Quote --- To accuse someone of being "snakelike" falls in the category of name calling and is not allowed.
--- End quote ---
But I didnīt. Like I just wrote to Mark, I said " your snakelike attempt" That is a one time attempt/act.
In love
Eagle
Craig:
Tomato, tomatoe, the fact is Eagle you posted something that Mark corrected you on, he didn't use his own words he used Rays and highlighted the key points for understanding.
You said "People are more than welcome to agree,disagree,like or dislike, or better yet: prove me wrong or right" I think Mark did just that but you really don't mean what you say because then you tell him "your snake like attempt to rebuke me failed". Personally I think he was spot on, but you don't have to agree you can believe whatever you want.
However Kat is right "your snakelike attempt" falls into the category of name calling.
Craig
Marky Mark:
Eagle, why I replied to your initial post was for reason,that,when I see the Good Name of the Lord being slandered by the use of false doctrines of men,for their own unscriptural summations,behind their own false agendas,not knowing the Truth nor giving due diligent study to that Truth,well, plainly stated,it irks the hell out of me. When we rightly divide His Truths,fruitless discussion is then alleviated.
2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
2Ti 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
--- Quote ---Now Youīre talking Thatīs all I hoped for.
--- End quote ---
I'm glad the Spirit opened your understanding behind His meaning concerning the flaming sword... :)
Peace...Mark
Gina:
::) >:( :-X
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version