> General Discussions
New Doctrine...
paulfisher:
From Ray...
Dear Michael: I am glad that our material is helpful to your understanding of the Scriptures. Have you not wondered why it is that I do not use what you call the names or titles of the Almighty from the Hebrew?
That's because these so-called sacred names are not inspired Scripture. The Name of our Lord and Saviour is "JESUS," not "Yeshua" as virtually all Internet sites will try to convince you. I will be going into detail regarding this Name in my future paper: "Solving the Enigma of God." So I'm afraid I will have to decline your request to change the Name of Jesus throughout all of my papers. Also, just what do you think the Name of Jesus' Father is? Jesus said He came to glorify His Father's Name. Well, WHAT IS IT? Think about it. How many times does Jesus and the New Testament writers make reference to the Name of God, the Name of the Father, yet not ONE of the so-called sacred name societies that criticize me for not using these sacred Hebrew names have a clue as to what the Name of the Father is as Jesus used it to glorify His Name. So the question is, how are you going to use "The Name of the Father," in my writings if you don't even know what the Name of the Father is in the first place?
Is "Jesus" mistranslated? Listen carefully now: When the Scriptures tell us that Peter was "FILLED with the with the Holy Spirit" (Acts 4: stating, "Be it known unto you all, and to ALL THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL, that by the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH, whom ye crucified, Whom God raised from the dead, even by Him doth this man stand here before you whole...Neither is there salvation in ANY OTHER: for there is NONE OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN given among men, whereby we MUST be saved" (Verses 10-12), nowhere in there do you see the name "Yeshua," do you?
I know you only mean good by your request, but changing the name of Jesus, "the ONLY NAME UNDER HEAVEN" by which we must be saved, will not further your cause for the Gospel. I hope this doesn't offend you.
God be with you,
Ray
Yahshua might be Hebrew for Jehovah (in English). Iesous is Greek for Jesus (in English). Perhaps if you were writing to us in Hebrew it would be Ok, although you're not.
Also, the salvation process is not infinite. I don't know where you get that.
CEO:
Hi Paul
Weren't the doctines of no physical circumcision, no physical baptism, no weekly or annual sabbath introduced into the apostles' church age, this age, many years after the ascension of Jesus and the establishment of His church?
Askseeknock
Charles O
Revilonivek:
I think he was talking about the false doctrines already being preached during the apostles' and Paul's time. Other people were already corrupting one doctrine with their own version of it. The question is who and what were the apostles referring to and what Paul was referring to . I think we will never know for sure but there was clearly disagreements about doctrines in the churches of Asia in revelations. Who knows? I'm just tired of all man made religions and wish it never existed in the first place. There's so much fighting about which religion or doctrine is right or wrong. I just want peace. I look forward to that day when religion is abolished for good. Sorry I couldn't answer much or were much help to your questions.
--- Quote from: paulfisher on February 16, 2013, 02:20:18 AM ---In any of the letters in the New Testament, was any new doctrine taught, or had all doctrine been taught during the authors actual presence among the new saints?
Paul
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version