> General Discussions

Correcting the KJV

(1/2) > >>

robby.morales:
Dear BTW Family:

In a number of Ray's audio messages he mentions the KJV as being a "pretty good" translation that just needs a few words corrected. I believe another time he mentioned an exact number of (78?) places that need correcting and THEN it's a great translation....

My question:

Is there a listing of the references that need correcting for the KJV? I would like to make notes in my KJV bible. 

As always, thank you,

Robby

Kat:

Hi Robby, no there was never a list of the errors and corrections for the KJV. Ray mentioned these errors in many places throughout his articles.

I find it very helpful to refer to a literal translation (Concordant, Young's, Rotherham) and you can see how those use a more accurate wording, for words like hell and forever.

mercy, peace and love
Kat

robby.morales:
Thank you Kat. You are very kind to respond. :-) I have the translations you mentioned on order.

Thanks again,

Robby

Dave in Tenn:
There is also a list of "spurious" passages which compare the earliest Greek texts with later translations, including the KJV.

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,6638.0.html

Don't take these as 'the gospel'.  It is simply a list of passages that don't match the earliest known manuscripts.

robby.morales:
Hi Dave:

Thank you. I just received my concordant nt today. :-) can you recommend any particular LIV bible?? There are so many!

Thanks again,

Robby

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page