> Off Topic Discussions
This looks SO awesome! I want to see it!
indianabob:
--- Quote from: lilitalienboi16 on January 20, 2015, 02:34:04 AM ---Well I have to tell you all, it was AMAZING and I HIGHLY recommend it! I'm definitely buying it when it comes out on DVD because its a keeper. Its put together so well.
Anyone who says the Exodus and Moses just didn't happen, or there is no evidence of Joshua's conquest, or even Joseph who was sold by his brothers is fiction, is either biast against the bible, doesn't know all the evidence, a flat out liar, or all of the above! This documentary just brings everything out there together very well and the problem with current Egyptian chronology in an easy to understand fashion for us non Egyptian/archaeological experts.
--- End quote ---
Let's all go and see this film and process the evidence.
Next year we should look for the new movie that presents the evidence for the Global Flood of Noah. That's the miracle that I would like to see illustrated from the copious evidence found all over this earth.
John 20:29 (KJ21) |
29 Jesus said unto him, “Thomas, because thou hast seen Me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they that have not seen and yet have believed.”
Juan 20:29 (LBLA) |
29 Jesús le dijo*: ¿Porque me has visto has creído? Dichosos los que no vieron, y sin embargo creyeron.
John from Kentucky:
No Global Flood.
If the whole world were covered with water, where did the water runoff to?
The ideas of a global flood, six literal twenty-four hour days of creation, the universe is only about 6,000 years old, there is eternal punishment of the wicked in hell, etc, etc.-----such false teachings give the Scriptures a bad name and discredits and defames God.
lilitalienboi16:
--- Quote from: John from Kentucky on January 26, 2015, 08:12:44 PM ---No Global Flood.
If the whole world were covered with water, where did the water runoff to?
The ideas of a global flood, six literal twenty-four hour days of creation, the universe is only about 6,000 years old, there is eternal punishment of the wicked in hell, etc, etc.-----such false teachings give the Scriptures a bad name and discredits and defames God.
--- End quote ---
Agreed John!
indianabob:
--- Quote from: John from Kentucky on January 26, 2015, 08:12:44 PM ---No Global Flood.
If the whole world were covered with water, where did the water runoff to?
The ideas of a global flood, six literal twenty-four hour days of creation, the universe is only about 6,000 years old, there is eternal punishment of the wicked in hell, etc, etc.-----such false teachings give the Scriptures a bad name and discredits and defames God.
--- End quote ---
Dear friends who know better than me. Doubting Thomases in my never to be humble opinion.
JUst my view of course. (smile)
(?) 1. If the whole world were covered with water where did the water run off to? To the oceans, where else...
If God can remove water from the mile wide, ten mile long Red Sea crossing, a wall of water 1000 feet high on both sides so that Moses could cross over, what is the big deal with submerging the earth in water?
Didn't God create the water in the first place? Or did it come from a comet crashing into the planet?
One is just as physically, naturally impossible as the other. But God is not natural. Otherwise we would not be here, none of us. This God who places us here is not limited. So why do we limit God sometimes?
Do we think it is more difficult to flood the earth than it is to resurrect a long dead person and give them a new set of identical molecules/atoms/memories? I do not! Especially when it shall be done billions of times over.
And if there is NO Resurrection we are just kidding ourselves.
(?) 2. not saying how old the Universe is. The point is ONLY about when Adam was created, about 4000 BC.
(?) 3. We agree about the "burning hell myth" but the Bible doesn't teach that, right?
AND dead people from the past have not gone to heaven either, right? Again not in scripture.
(?) 4. [FALSE teachings?] The story of Noah's flood and the Red sea crossing are in O.T. scripture in plain language, not hidden or kept from mankind to be discovered later when apostle Paul revealed them.
(?) 5. No person can defame God and God does not need us to defend God. Some religions do teach that humans need to defend their God with brutal reactions, our Father God does not. Correct?
I do not know of my own experience or knowledge HOW the earth was flooded, but I see the evidence of great canyons and sea shells on ALL the earth's mountain tops and ocean depths equal to mountain heights and I can calculate that there is presently enough water on the earth to submerge a smooth surfaced earth 2 or 3 miles deep.
It seems reasonable and logical that the God who put this earth in orbit around the sun and put the moon in orbit around the earth and has kept it there for at least several thousand years, moderating the tides and giving us light at night time could just as easily raise the existing mountains to their present level at the same time God abated the flood of waters. The same logic would apply to pock marks in the wet muddy surface caused by falling missiles during the first few years after the flood abated. All of that mud and clay took time to dry out and for seeds to become trees, especially since it rained again but more gently.
The fact that we don't have an explanation from Scripture does not prove that it did not happen.
I'm keeping an open mind and trusting that God would not put obvious errors in His Scripture.
p.s. I'm really, really critical of carbon 14 and radio isotope dating that assume steady state conditions during the past millions of years. Now that is a real fairy tale. (smile)
Kindly offered, Indiana Bob
Dave in Tenn:
?4..."plain language" tells us the whole land was covered. Theological assumption tells us "the whole earth" as we understand the earth--the whole planet.
I'll not pick apart every question except to remind us that we are at bible-truths.com. Ray did a study on this. It's part of the Nashville '08 conference. And some didn't like that one because it was "too scientific". What's a man to do? Teach science? Debate science?
Please...not here, gentlemen.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version