bible-truths.com/forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Forum related how to's?  Post your questions to the membership.


.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: What is (or isn't) substitutionary atonement?  (Read 3660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Farlsborough

  • Guest
What is (or isn't) substitutionary atonement?
« on: April 04, 2015, 08:39:59 PM »

Happy Easter, everyone! If you celebrate it, that is.

A seasonal question:
I've listened several times to a Ray's talks on "was Jesus made sin?", and have gained a great deal from them.  What I'd like to know is, does this refer to the church teaching of "substitutionary atonement" or is he rebuking a doctrine that goes beyond that, i.e. what is taught by this splinter group he keeps referring?

Looking at wikipedia, it gets a bit confusing, but if I had to nail it down it looks like Ray's view aligns with the "ransom theory of atonement"? I realise he possibly wouldn't appreciate an analysis of his teaching in the terms of theologians...  :-\
Logged

Dave in Tenn

  • Bible-Truths Forum Member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4312
    • FaceBook David Sanderson
Re: What is (or isn't) substitutionary atonement?
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2015, 01:28:28 AM »

I've listened several times to a Ray's talks on "was Jesus made sin?", and have gained a great deal from them.  What I'd like to know is, does this refer to the church teaching of "substitutionary atonement" or is he rebuking a doctrine that goes beyond that, i.e. what is taught by this splinter group he keeps referring?

In those studies, primarily the latter I think.
Logged
Heb 10:32  But you must continue to remember those earlier days, how after you were enlightened you endured a hard and painful struggle.

Extol

  • Bible-Truths Forum Member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 660
Re: What is (or isn't) substitutionary atonement?
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2015, 09:52:54 AM »

Happy Easter, everyone! If you celebrate it, that is.

A seasonal question:
I've listened several times to a Ray's talks on "was Jesus made sin?", and have gained a great deal from them.  What I'd like to know is, does this refer to the church teaching of "substitutionary atonement" or is he rebuking a doctrine that goes beyond that, i.e. what is taught by this splinter group he keeps referring?

Looking at wikipedia, it gets a bit confusing, but if I had to nail it down it looks like Ray's view aligns with the "ransom theory of atonement"? I realise he possibly wouldn't appreciate an analysis of his teaching in the terms of theologians...  :-\

Hi Farlsborough,

The studies were given to directly refute the splinter group's teaching that Christ became sin. He says at the beginning that he can't spend all his time refuting every false teaching,  but that one was important to him because there were people actively trying to dissuade folks from this fellowship and join the other side.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 23 queries.