> General Discussions

Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

<< < (5/6) > >>

ZekeSr:
Here’s an interesting aside to the subject. It’s a 20-minute lecture by Jack Horner, a well known paleontologist, presenting evidence that paleontology doesn’t even have the variety of species correct. Many of the “evolutionarily related” varieties are actually the same animal at different stages of their life and growth development.

The Shape-Shifting Skulls of Dinosaurs | Jack Horner | TEDxVancouver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYbMXzBwpIo

Mike

indianabob:
Hi Mike,

Watched the video and enjoyed it.
Also note that the younger and medium size dinosaurs since they were still growing had remaining soft tissue in their bones.
It is my understanding from other sources that soft tissue cannot possibly survive for long ages.
The assumptions then may be that these artifacts are NOT millions of years old.
Probably not more than a few thousands of years old. Interesting and revealing wouldn't you say?

ZekeSr:
Hi Bob,

For some reason I can't get your quote to take, so I cut and pasted it below:

"It is my understanding from other sources that soft tissue cannot possibly survive for long ages.
The assumptions then may be that these artifacts are NOT millions of years old.
Probably not more than a few thousands of years old. Interesting and revealing wouldn't you say?"

I don't believe Jack Horner meant that the tissue was still actually soft and spongy. He was referring to the fossilized appearance of the consistency as it still remained visible. 

Mike

indianabob:
Hi Mike,
Point taken, i will check my old memory bank for sources from the past.
It just could be, however unlikely that I may think it, that my memory is lapsing a little.
I may reply later if I find anything helpful... ::)

indianabob:
Hello again Mike.
Please see recent PM on dino subject.
Use it if you believe it would be helpful.
Indiana Bob

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page