> Off Topic Discussions
Gravity
Sorin:
--- Quote from: mcmiller ---That would mean I would be in both places at the same time, or essentially everywhere at once. Sounds like God.
--- End quote ---
Amazing!! :shock:
So that's how God does it. :-k
eutychus:
--- Quote from: mcmiller ---Time travel -
Forward is easy, we are doing it right now.
Backwards I believe is not possible because it would violate the conservation of mass and energy. If I could travel backwards to yesterday, my yesterday self would be there and my today self would also be there at the same time. This would add my current mass to yesterday thus increasing the mass of the universe just a bit. Not allowed by current theory. If I sent 1000 gallons of gasoline backwards to yesterday it would increase the energy of the universe. Also not permitted, but it sure would solve the energy crisis.
Mark
--- End quote ---
thats cool i love this type of stuff.
you see the movie, "freqency" ?
no time travel mass wise but radio waves transmitted 30 yr span of time.
cool movie
mcmiller:
Hello Sorin,
As far as I'm concerned, God does what He does because He is God and it is His nature.
He is by nature:
Eternal
All powerful
All knowing
Everywhere
Self Existant
In control
Wise beyond measure
Unlimited
LOVE
etc., etc.
Mark
hillsbororiver:
--- Quote from: mcmiller ---
Consider this: according to relativity theory, the faster an object travels, the more massive it becomes and time proceeds more slowly for the object as observed from the outside. If I could travel at the speed of light, time would appear normal for me but in actuality it would stop. What that would mean is that I could travel between two distant objects in zero time. That would mean I would be in both places at the same time, or essentially everywhere at once. Sounds like God.
Mark
--- End quote ---
If you left earth traveling to a planet 1 million light years away at the speed of light, wouldn't it be that you would arrive at your destination the same age as you left physically, but whatever was left of earth would be a million years older?
eutychus:
--- Quote from: hillsbororiver ---
--- Quote from: mcmiller ---
Consider this: according to relativity theory, the faster an object travels, the more massive it becomes and time proceeds more slowly for the object as observed from the outside. If I could travel at the speed of light, time would appear normal for me but in actuality it would stop. What that would mean is that I could travel between two distant objects in zero time. That would mean I would be in both places at the same time, or essentially everywhere at once. Sounds like God.
Mark
--- End quote ---
If you left earth traveling to a planet 1 million light years away at the speed of light, wouldn't it be that you would arrive at your destination the same age as you left physically, but whatever was left of earth would be a million years older?
--- End quote ---
it would take a million yrs to reach a planet a million light yrs away, even if you travelled at the speed of light ;-]
and the planet you reach would be a million yrs older than when you left!!
what we see is not what is there.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version