> Email to Ray
Darwin
Craig:
Thanks,
I like the big bang theory myself. Someone watching over us...yea right. Part of life. I think Darwin hit it on the nose. What about you?
COMMENT:
I think they should have hit Darwin on his nose, and then his head.
You haven't actually read anything on my site, have you?
This is something I wrote six years ago in my Critique of John Hagee's damnable sermon on hell:
"Colin Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Natural History Museum, asked his audience of evolution experts a most telling question. He later posed the same question to the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History, and again to The Evolutionary Morphology Seminar at the University of Chicago. All evolution experts. Here was his question:
"Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, ANY ONE THING. . . that is TRUE?"
All he got was silence!"
There is nothing in the theory of spontaneous generation, or evolution, or origin of the species, THAT IS TRUE. And so you are left with.......NOTHING!
And, NO, I do not have the time to debate this with you for the rest of my life.
Ray
Falconn003:
" BIG BANG "theory
What a fictious hocus pocus crock of manure.
In school i got sent to the principle's office for asking "What was BIG, and why did it go BANG " ???
My science teacher got fustraded with being put in his corner.
And so i was sent for not being a quiet participant of this bogus school of thinking.
Imagine that being sent to the office for acting smart and quizative. The next day i returned to class in a sarcasm of dumbness and told my teacher " 'em edumacated en otay now duh....duh...." :wink:
Rodger
Falconn003:
bobbys43
Yea i know what you are saying...i counted the nuts a squirrel ate and wished one of them was my science teacher..... :wink:
Rodger
eutychus:
i have a problem with darwin and evolution but not with the big bang .
intellegent design can go hand in hadn with the big bang, for me anyway.
((((Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions. ))))))))
In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from an enormously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The Big Bang theory is based on the observed Hubble's law redshift of distant galaxies that when taken together with the cosmological principle indicate that space is expanding according to the Friedmann-Lemaître model of general relativity. Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity (for reporting on some of the more notable speculation on this issue, see cosmogony).
The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (Hubble's law) began — calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago (±2%) — and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory [1].
One consequence of the Big Bang is that the conditions of today's universe are different from the conditions in the past or in the future. From this model, George Gamow in 1948 was able to predict, at least qualitatively, the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) [2]. The CMB was discovered in the 1960s and further validated the Big Bang theory over its chief rival, the steady state theory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang
eutychus:
--- Quote from: bobbys43 ---OOOOOOOOOOOK!!!!
I am now looking out the window and counting the number of branches there are on the tree!!!!!(no leaves yet!!)
bobby
--- End quote ---
thats nice bobby :roll:
whats your theory on how God made the visable from the invisable?
how he brought into exsistance things that where not there?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version