Now here’s another letter (email), this guy has a totally different attitude. I don’t want to read the whole thing, I will just skip around here a little bit. He says;
So by your own account, I can do what I want, live as I want, have as many women as I want.
In fact there is nothing under the sun that can separate me from God, in the end I will get rewarded anyway.
So there is a whole bunch of things that he doesn’t understand. First of all he takes credit to himself for being able to live righteously, so that he will be one that God will save. But isn’t it interesting he says, so by you account, “I can do what I want” and then in the end I will be saved “anyway.’ Well, listen isn’t that what you have done most of your life, up until the time you were converted? Isn’t that what we all do?
What if the Scripture said that if you live the way you want to live and do the things that you want to do that are wrong, you can’t be saved? Well guess what, this guy would be out of commission too, wouldn’t he? Of course he would, unless he said I’ve never did any of those things. Not only did he do them, but he still wants to, the truth of the matter is. So what you are saying is, “I could live as I WANT”… the WANT is still there! What does he want most? Many women, this guy is not converted at all.
Then we have this thing of “I will get rewarded ANYWAY.” No, not ANYWAY, ONLY God‘s way. It’s not anyway, it’s only God’s way.
Now He says, “nothing can separate me from God.” Yes it can, the Bible says your sins have separated between you and God. Sure it can. What he is saying is, I don’t ever have to stop sinning and I still won’t ever be separated. I never said that, the Scriptures don’t say that. See how perverted and screwed up their thinking gets.
He says “in the end“… that’s right, in the end, but what has to transpires between all of this sin and evil and the end? What has to transpire to bring about the desired end? Not a continuation of what you are doing. It’s totally out of the equation. They think, ‘boy I nailed Ray on that.’ He doesn’t even know what he’s talking about.
Yes in the end;
AFTER BITTER REPENTANCE
AFTER BEING JUDGED
AND LEARNING RIGHTEOUSNESS
Then is the end after you do all of these things. All of those things are going to product those good end results. It’s what happens in the interim there and some place along the line you are going to have to change. You are going to have to stop doing those things. I’ve said these things a lot of times, but who is listening.
The things are not difficult, if we pay really close attention to the words. See he thinks I’m saying God is going to save you in your evil corrupt sinful ways. He is going to save you IN your sins. It doesn’t say that! Let’s notice Roman, back to chapter 8. I said this is one of the most profound chapters in the New Testament, Romans chapter 8, there is so much in here.
Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free FROM (not in) the law of sin and death.
You don’t get saved IN, you get saved FROM. Well you say, ‘if there is no hell, Ray, what are we saved from?’ We are saved “from” the things that the Bible says we are saved from “sin and death.” Or does the Bible say we are saved from an eternal hell of torture? Where does it say we are saved from that? Where, show me a Scripture? There is no such Scripture, it‘s nonsense.
Now let me ask the question, if we don’t have a freedom to do anything we want, nothing causes us, forces us, makes us, influences us, we are totally free from all that. What about God, is God free to do anything? [Comment: He never changes.] Yeah, but is He free to change? [He’s God He can do anything He wants.] [He is subject to the council of His own will.] There you go Harry. He can do anything He wants like Denny says, but He doesn’t want! Why doesn’t He want? Well He just freely decided that He doesn’t want? No, that’s not what the Bible says. We want to stick with the Scripture and believe the Scripture, so let’s look at the Scripture and believe what the Scripture say.
ALL UNDER LAW
You all know that the Bible says God cannot lie. Right?
Titus 1:2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie…
If He has freedom of will, then He can lie. Am I right? If His will is FREE, there is no such thing as He cannot lie. Well if He cannot lie, why can’t He lie? Has someone told Him He can’t lie?
Eph 1:11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of Him (God) who works all things after the counsel of His own will:
I don’t suppose you would be too far off base if you were to say, He works out all things after the LAW of His on will. Because the council of God is law. It’s like in ‘The King and I,’ so let it be written, so let it be done. That‘s the law baby.
So is God free to lie? NO! No He is not. Because He has determined by the counsel of His own will that He will not and can not lie.
So then why do we think we have freedom to do contrary to what things make us do? Listen, this universe is a law abiding universe. Explosions are regulated by laws. The earth and all our environments and the ecosystem is all operated by law. Our body, our mind all operates by law.
Now we said that the carnal mind is not subject to the law of God, but it is subject to the law of carnality, of sin and death and the lusts of the flesh and all of that? It is subject to that.
So one way or another you’re going to be subject to law. You can not live outside of the realm of law. You are a law abiding creature, one way or the other. You can’t will yourself out of law, you can’t.
I mean men have desired to fly, they can’t. You say, ‘well I’ll just will it.’ You can’t, there is a law against allowing a man to flap his arms and fly, there is a law against that, it’s called gravity. So you’ve got to make an instrument that’s more powerful than a man that can lift you off the ground.
So you are either under one law or another, but you are always under law. If you are under law, you are not free to do what the law dictates, because laws do work they do operate.
End of audio 1
THE INTERPRETATION
by ARISTOTLE
I want to read you something here that Aristotle wrote, because we are going to get a little more technical on this. I’m hoping through that we can understand this principle, this law if you will of cause and effect and that man does not have a freedom of will to do anything contrary to what God knows he will do.
Man wants to think that… it’s like Oprah Winfrey said, ‘Invictous’ I guess it’s the name of the poem, that’s her favorite poem; I am the captain of my soul… you know I can do what I want, it’s all me and so on. People like that feeling.
So back to Aristotle, this is before Christ. Aristotle wrote a piece called ‘The Interpretation’ where he discusses a case about a sea battle that is going to take place the next day. There is going to be Two warring admirals, A and B, that are preparing their fleets for a decisive sea battle tomorrow. The battle will be fought until one side is victorious. You got the premise?
But the “logical laws (or principles)” of the excluded middle (every proposition is either true or false) and of noncontradiction (no proposition is both true and false), require that one of the propositions, “A wins” and “it is false that A wins,” is true and the other is false. Suppose “A wins” is (today) true. Then whatever A does (or fails to do) today will make no difference:
Comment: Understand what he’s saying? A cannot both win and lose the battle and B cannot both win and lose the battle. So he says suppose A (today) is true that he wins. Then whatever he does or fails to do today will make no difference.
A must win; similarly, whatever B does (or fails to do) today will make no difference: the outcome is already settled (that is, A must win). Or again, suppose “A wins” is (today) false. Then no matter what A does today (or fails to do), it will make no difference: A must lose;
Comment: Do you understand that, is it all clear? Simple enough, right?
Similarly, no matter what B does (or fails to do), it will make no difference: the outcome is already settled (that is, A must lose). Thus, if every proposition is either true or false (and not both), then planning, or as Aristotle put it ‘taking trouble’, is futile. The future will be what it will be, irrespective of our planning, intentions, etc.
Well what about it? Does anybody see anything wrong with Aristotle’s argument? No. You don’t see a major flaw in that thinking? [Comment: Well what we do matters, which leads to the outcome, so everything we do matters.] Not if the outcome is already determined. [What God causes us to do, makes the outcome.] Understand what he is saying, if it’s true today, that A will win the sea battle, that is the truism, it’s true he will win. Then it’s doesn’t matter what he does or what he prepares or anything, he will win. What’s wrong with this premise?
I was surprise that the philosopher that wrote this, he didn’t catch it either. What’s wrong with Aristotle’s thinking here? His idea is right. [Comment: His 3rd person is wrong, he’s missing the 3rd person.] In what way? [The control of who is controlling the win.] Well I think you are getting close to it, you are close to it Harry. But that’s not quite it.
I had to read this twice myself. Okay, here it is. One of the propositions has to be true, A wins or it is false that A wins is true and the other is false. You can’t have A winning and losing, both propositions. You can’t have A and B winning, you can’t have that contradictory that can’t be true, those contradictions.
Now notice what he says, “Suppose “A wins” is (today) true.” Then whatever A does or doesn’t do will not effect the outcome, he’ll win. Right? What’s wrong with that? Harry just about had it, you were pretty close Harry, here’s the problem with his argument, the word SUPPOSE. “Suppose A wins is (today) true.” Who is supposing? Who is the supposer? What knowledge or understanding do we have that anything that will happen tomorrow is already predetermined to happen, today? What knowledge do we have of anything like that? How can we say or suggest or think anything like that?
Let me show you real simply how you can knock that suppose out of there. Suppose A wins is (today) true, today that is a truism, tomorrow A will win the sea battle. Right? But supposing tomorrow there is a giant cyclone or something or hurricane and they don’t even go to war or go to battle. Then how was it true that A wins the battle tomorrow, they are not even going to battle? So it can’t be true today that A wins tomorrow, it is only a supposition. The truth is, Mr. Aristotle, your supposition is wrong and groundless.
There is only one way and I said it in the beginning of the study, there is only one way that we can know whether they win the battle tomorrow and therefore it’s true today to say it. There is only one way and that is IF GOD PREDICTS IT.
You take God out of the equation and you can suppose all you want, because there is no way to state that anything that’s going to happen tomorrow is true today. Because it may not happen. A could send all his men home, they leave and all go home, so they don‘t fight. B is out there ready to fight, but where are they? They all went home, see.
That’s why free will is predicated on the foreknowledge of God! The foreknowledge of God is what wipes it out. If God knows what will happen, nothing that any one can do can prevent it from happening.
Somebody said something about there are causes that bring about whether A would win anyway. Maybe A is going to win because God is going to perform a miracle, you know, he is just going to sink the other fleet by some bad weather and they don‘t even go to war. But A won. So there are causes.
That’s what’s wrong with this guys email, he thinks a little too much like Aristotle. He jumps from A to Z and everything between A to Z is the same lustful, carnal minded living that he “wants.” He thinks that if A is being born and Z is entering the kingdom of God and he thinks that whatever he does at B,C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K… he will still end up in the kingdom of God “regardless.” That’s not true.
Is it true that you will end up in the kingdom of God? Absolutely, but not by doing A lusting after all the women, robbing, stealing, cheating or whatever and doing it in stage B of his life and stage C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P… No.!
You have got to be able to see through these stupid arguments. So are we making sense so far?
ROBOT?
So the argument is, without free will, then we must be nothing but robots. Oh really? How many times do you hear that said, I mean it’s so many, many, many times. They think that’s a logical argument. It’s either this or that. Oh really? Is there only black and white, are there no shades gray? Are there not colors red, blue, green? Is everything black and white?
So either we have free will or we are stupid dumb robot? No. Now what if there are some similarities between robots and humans? Is that a bad thing? You all have seen robot, right? They operate just like the human skeleton with muscles on it. Is that not similar? Does not a robot look like a strange mechanical man, kind of? Right? Of course there are similarities, what’s wrong with that? They say, ‘oh robot, that’s an ugly word, a machine. We don’t want a machine.’ Machines are wonderful things.
Your body has little machines in them too. You see that one little thing in the cell that’s made like a motor boat with a propeller on the back? It is incredible what they are finding out. What else is in there? It is some amazing stuff.
Okay so yes there are some similarities between a man an a machine and a man an a robot. But there are a lot of dissimilarities too.
Do robots have faith? No.
Do robots have emotions? Do they get happy, are they happy some days and sad some days and melancholy? No.
Are robots creative? No, they do exactly what they are programmed to do or else they screw up whatever it is they are suppose to be making.
Are robots capable of love?
Do robots learn? Now I know they are working on intelligent design, but that’s not the kind of learning that I’m talking about. I’m talking about a much higher level.