> General Discussions

Creationism theories.

<< < (2/3) > >>

Deborah-Leigh:
I believe that the gem is what Ray has identified as being "FOR SIX DAYS" not on the sixth day!

There has to be much more to reveal out of that observation.

Pretty exciting!

Peace be to you

Arcturus :)

Hunter:
Thank you Kat for sharing those excerpts. I was a little impatient from excitement to hear about where Ray was going with this, and that definitely quenches it some.

I'm glad that we aren't denying scientific evidence, and still keeping true to the scriptures. That's very refreshing. I don't like hearing evolutionist Christians simply saying: "We don't know how long a day was in the first few chapters of Genesis" and then leave it at that. I knew there was more. And they're certainly approaching it from the wrong standpoint.

So far this approach is sound.  ;)

musicman:
I would say that about 95% of people that don't believe in evolution also don't believe in scientific methods of dating.  Neither do they believe in the big bang theory.  Count me as one of the 5%.

Grateful:
Hi all !

My understanding of the word 'spirit' comes from my Webster's Collegiate Edition of the American Language, and it is this :   the ORIGIN of the word is "to breathe;  to blow".  Hence God gives the BREATH OF LIFE to EVERY living soul.  And the Spirit is the source of inSPIRation and exPIRation....inbreathing and outbreathing.  Also, "PIR" ("PYR") is derived from "fire".   So, go figure.....

And THAT is why this saying is SO TRUE : NEVER give up hope as long as there is a breath of Life!!     :D

May Divine Inspiration BLESS you today!!!    :)

Linda

Linny:
I will be very interested to see how Ray deals with this topic. I have studied Creation Science quite a bit and am going to the new museum in Northern Ky soon. I have heard the greatest Creationist speakers in the world and see the science in it.
I also have studied Evolutionist theory and how the laws of nature don't fit into it. I have learned about how they do their circular dating.
Creationists teach that the moon dust measured 6000-10000 yrs old. They also show how it didn't take millions of years to form the Grand Canyon by showing a canyon that was made in hours.
Again, I will look forward to Ray's teachings and see how they meld with Creation Science.
I will always lean towards Creationism ideas over Evolutionism any day and have great respect for these learned men and women who step out in ridicule to defend our Creator whether they are 100% correct or not.
I saw where Ray said he has studied secular Geology but has he ever said he has studied Creation Science or read any of their books? A close friend of mine has his degree in Geology and found Creation Science to un-do all he had learned in college using science themselves.
Again, I'll be very interested to see what Ray has learned.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page