> General Discussions
Immaculate conception
OhioRob:
No Thoughts?
Daniel:
OhioRob,
I haven't questioned this after the way you have, I try to see the Spiritual truths in the gospel and pretty much avoid mans reasonings after it. Paul shared the gospel not with human wisdom and when he spake like a man he would say.
I see the birth in scripture as an allegory Paul refers. Made of a woman under the law is as a spiritual truth in relation to Christ, not having anything to do with carnal sex or anything like that.
She is as an allegory.
Gal 4:4-5 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
Thats how I see it, and I can only see what I see by the will of God.
Daniel
chrissiela:
Daniel, I have NO idea what you just said??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
NO OFFENSE!!!! :shock: :D
OhioBob,
When you refer to the daughter of men and the sons of God are you referring to 'human' woman intermingling (or having sex with) 'spiritual' (or angelic) 'BEINGS'? I know that that is something that is taught or how those verses are sometime 'understood' by some.
But BOTH are referring to 'humans'....
one can be a son/daughter 'of God' or one can be a son/daughter 'of men'.
Sort of like those IN the church (sons of God) intermingling (or being "unequally yoked" if you will) with those OUTSIDE of the church (daughters of men).
Just as one can have Satan as a "father".
See what I mean? I can explain it better later and give references, but I have to 'run' for awhile....
... or you might try doing a search on the *not-allowed* website. I am sure that Mike has something there that explains this. (not sure if there is a search function at the BT's website, but if so you could try there, too). Otherwise I will post more later or reference the link for you.
Blessings,
Chrissie
OhioRob:
Chrissie, I follow your reasoning. But unions between humans and humans result in humans. not Nephillium right? I read somewhere that these unions in Gen 6 have a direct bearing on explaining Pauls teaching in Corinthians 11 about women wearing head coverings "because of the Angels". I know that Sons of God can refer to man, but in Job it is referring to Angels isn't it? When Jesus says that in the kingdom we wont be givin in marriage but will be as the Angels, does he mean we will be sexless, or all SONS of God.
Daniel, thanks for your response. How do you discern between what is allaory and what is literal?
Daniel:
--- Quote ---Daniel, I have NO idea what you just said??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
NO OFFENSE!!!! :shock: :D
--- End quote ---
None taken :lol: I'll pray for you Chrissie :lol:
Daniel
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version