bible-truths.com/forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Need Account Help?  Email bibletruths.forum@gmail.com   

Forgotten password reminders does not work. Contact the email above and state what you want your password changed to. (it must be at least 8 characters)

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: More 'Refutations' of Rays works...  (Read 11908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mickyd

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #20 on: May 11, 2006, 07:32:57 AM »

Quote from: theyachtman
Mid 1800's: Firstly, I would throw out anything with the name 'Darby' on it.  John Darby was one of the founding fathers of Dispensational Theology which was based on his literal interpretation of the bible.  

Late 1800's: Darby inspired Cyrus Scofield, a felon and a man who abandoned his family to pursue his corrupt Scofield Commentary with more literal interpretation, but only commenting on parts of the bible that suited his agenda.

1900's: Dallas Theological Seminary and the budding Assemblies Of God church put their own book covers on Scofields corrupted work and look what a mess that ensued:

1.) The so called rapture of the church
2.) This so-called one man antichrist
3.) Manipulation/lapse of Daniel's 70 weeks
4.) One set tribulation period for all
5.) The rejected-by-God Jews who rejected the Son Of God the all of a sudden being a 'chosen' people again.

And so much more . . .

Not sure I want debate with you MickeyD because quite honestly YOU are where I was about 5 years ago and you must cut through all these weeds to get to the next clearing God has for you.  I look forward to that day!


I was being sarcastic....I don't buy into all that. But, I can see where you might have thought so.  :)

BTW....thanks for the info and timeline. That's useful stuff I did not have.
Logged

Falconn003

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #21 on: May 11, 2006, 08:50:12 AM »

Hi folks

ONE thing that stood out most, on the head article, was that the writer did not/ was uncabale to refute anything of Spiritual significance.  He simply could not SEE !!!

And this alone made all his article a pointless BLIND vain ambition !!!

God bless


Rodger
Logged

SteveB

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #22 on: May 11, 2006, 11:21:56 AM »

Quote
Hey Bro, I'm a Bro too!  


Sorry Man! I dont know why i thought that.  :oops:
Logged

Sorin

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #23 on: May 11, 2006, 09:17:35 PM »

Quote from: SteveB
Quote
Hey Bro, I'm a Bro too!  


Sorry Man! I dont know why i thought that.  :oops:



Hehe. It's quite alright. :wink:
Logged

Kevin

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #24 on: May 11, 2006, 09:34:41 PM »

SteveB, Sorin
Man thats funny :lol:
Logged

Sorin

  • Guest
More 'Refutations' of Rays works...
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2006, 10:24:40 PM »

Quote from: Kevin
SteveB, Sorin
Man thats funny :lol:



Haha! Yeah!    :lol:
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 17 queries.