bible-truths.com/forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Need Account Help?  Email bibletruths.forum@gmail.com   

Forgotten password reminders does not work. Contact the email above and state what you want your password changed to. (it must be at least 8 characters)

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Concordant Literal New Testament  (Read 8008 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Roy Coates

  • Guest
Concordant Literal New Testament
« on: May 07, 2008, 02:49:44 AM »

My new CLNT just arrived. This will take some getting used to. Seems I will spend some considerable time to learn the different codes, abbreviations, symbols, etc. Wish it came in a larger print. Anybody else reading the CLNT on a regular basis with some advise or input.
Logged

Martinez

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2008, 05:09:56 AM »

No, but I am reading a Rotherham's emphasized.

It is fairly hard to read because the print itself is fairly small and it looks like it was printed via a photocopier or something.

the worst book to try and read is anything by Paul, He just has a way of wording some of the most simple things so they seem really complicated.

Mmm, that could just be me?
Logged

Craig

  • Bible-Truths Forum Member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4282
  • There are two kinds of cops.The quick and the dead
Logged

Dennis Vogel

  • Administrator
  • Bible-Truths Forum Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3328
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2008, 10:11:01 AM »

I just ordered another Concordant Roy. How long did it take to get yours?

Dennis
Logged

chuckt

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2008, 10:41:28 AM »

greetings!!

Yes i use the CLV all the time, its grown on me for sure. i also just got a concordant cometery on the book of danial so far pretty interesting.

peace
chuckt



Logged

Roy Coates

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2008, 01:49:43 PM »

Dennis,
pay pal cleared on 3-28 or 3-29, book received 5-6 ordered direct from CPC. I saw CLNT available on Amazon but it was significantly more expensive. A bit of a wait but not too bad.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2008, 03:31:42 AM by Roy Coates »
Logged

chav

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2008, 05:58:52 PM »

Hi
I have a paperback version concordant NT which I purchased off Amamzon. I have tried emailing concordant a couple of times to see whether I can get the one with the key words in it , but they have never replied. Where did you get yours from Dennis and how much ?
What's difference between concordant and diaglott and where would I get one of those.?

Dave UK
Logged

Dennis Vogel

  • Administrator
  • Bible-Truths Forum Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3328
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2008, 06:18:51 PM »

Logged

Martinez

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2008, 06:49:40 PM »

I see that they have bible audio as well, that's handy!, but it's on tape.
Logged

mrl1970

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2008, 02:08:29 AM »

No, but I am reading a Rotherham's emphasized.

It is fairly hard to read because the print itself is fairly small and it looks like it was printed via a photocopier or something.


Martinez Do you have places in the rotherham where some of the printing is hard to see not because of the size of the letters but because the printing is too light?
Logged

Martinez

  • Guest
Re: Concordant Literal New Testament
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2008, 05:28:35 AM »

No, but I am reading a Rotherham's emphasized.

It is fairly hard to read because the print itself is fairly small and it looks like it was printed via a photocopier or something.


Martinez Do you have places in the rotherham where some of the printing is hard to see not because of the size of the letters but because the printing is too light?


Because it's too small, but partly because the printing is just that little bit too light also.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 23 queries.