Bible Study July 1, 2007 - Audio #1
http://bible-truths.com/audio/07-01-07_Part1.mp3 DO JAMES AND PAUL CONTRADICT?
[If so which one is right or is both of them right?]
Today’s study is a study I thought of giving numerous times through the years. Why I didn’t I don’t know. I guess in some ways I thought well I don’t know if that’s interesting enough to people or whatever my reasons were. Then I got to thinking about it this week when I received two emails. This is God’s way of timing things, He wanted me to give this today. I’ve received emails in the pass on this same thing, but this week I received two emails. One was very short, just a couple of little short paragraphs and the subject was, ‘Was Paul the first heretic?’
The other email was from a fellow that wrote pages and I didn’t even deem to answer him. He wrote pages of material, it was a young man from Texas. He said, ‘oh how I like your site and I’m learning... it’s terrific… it’s wonderful… But come on Ray (he used terms like that, ‘come on Ray.’) you know Paul was a heretic. You know that he was no good… You know that don’t you Ray, surely you can see that.’
He just went on for pages like that. I didn’t even deem to answer the guy. But I got to thinking about it and this is a really very important subject and I need to cover it.
Do James and Paul in their basic theology contradict each other? Have you ever heard that controversy? Two thousand years they have been debating this. Most of them siding with Paul and putting James in the category as heretic.
Remember we are talking James the brother of Christ. James who in Acts 15 at the Jerusalem conference, when Paul and Barnabas and those came to meet with everyone. I mean everybody was there, all the believing Pharisees that was converted and all of the elders, the Apostles and the chief people and the whole congregation. They were all there and James was there. Who gave the final summation of what was to be done with what was discussed at that conference? Who gave the final summation? James.
Yet, Martin Luther who started ‘the’ Reformation, he is attributed to others too, but this was the primary one, what they called
The Protestant Reformation. He calls James "an Epistle of straw" and the main reason being that James emphasizes ‘works,’ good works. Dr. Martin Luther, of course was by "faith ALONE."
WHO TEACHES ‘FAITH ALONE’
This faith alone… the word alone, this is something that has been interjected at the time of Martin Luther and I’m going to show you that it was him that did it. I just looked up a few, but I mean there are hundreds. So I just looked up this few.
Joe Tkach in the Worldwide Church of God, because most of us came out of there. Tkach says, now that he’s following in the ranks of Hank Handegraph and all of those heretic, he says "we are saved by faith ALONE, without resort to works of ANY KIND."
James Dobson says, "we are justified by faith ALONE." Where did he get that word alone.
Billy Graham, "faith ALONE." Now I believe it was Billy Graham, I don’t know how many years ago when he had one of his really big or first rallies in Berlin, he was sure to emphasize that we are justified by faith ALONE. Why did he do that? Well he wanted to get in good with the Germany, because it was their great reformer Martin Luther who introduced this word alone.
Listen to this, I’m going to read this now about the same way that theologians would try to. How Billy Graham and Dobson and Tkach would try to show you how they are right on this ‘faith ALONE.’ They might quote Paul in Galatians 2.
Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law…
Well there you go. Paul says...
Gal 2:16 …but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. (also 17-21)
Now that is pretty clear, isn’t it. I mean it sounds pretty clear, doesn’t it. Will anybody be justified in the eyes of God by doing works of the law? Paul say no. James says...
James 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works...
v. 24 Ye see then how that BY WORKS A MAN IS JUSTIFED...
Is that a contradiction? It sure sounds like one if you read it like that, doesn’t it. One place says, not by works but by faith in Christ and then not by works of the law. Then James comes along and says was not Abraham justified by works, you see then that a man if justified by works.
Okay, it’s not a contradiction. Now follow me closely. I so help me God think the worse offenders of Christian hermeneutics are the Christian theologians. They are the worse. They say that difficult Scriptures must be interpreted by simpler, more to the point Scriptures. They’ve got all these principles and context context context. Yet when they try to ensconce their heretical teaching, they break every rule in the book and they do it with impunity.
We started off with this word ‘alone.’ We are justified, saved by faith alone. Justification is by faith alone. Faith alone.
I read you two verses, one by Paul and one by James. Did you see the word ‘alone’? It’s not there. Well where in the world did it come from? I’ll show you.
MARTIN LUTHER INSERTED THE WORD ‘ALONE’
This I have is a very old translation of the Bible by Martin Luther, from back in the 1500’s. Now I’ll take you to Romans 3:28. In says in there;
Roemer 3:28 German: Luther (1545)
So halten wir es nun, daß der Mensch gerecht werde ohne des Gesetzes Werke, allein durch den Glauben.
“Allein” means alone. “Glauden” means belief or faith. That’s Martin Luther’s from the 1500’s.
Now let’s read that from the King James.
Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds (or works) of the law.
Do you see the word ‘alone.’ No. No you don’t. It’s interesting that Martin Luther puts little margin notes. He puts them actually not in the margin, but he puts them right next to the verses. He has Galatians 2:16. Maybe it is just to help people see another reference.
Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ…
Now it doesn’t say ‘alone’ does it. But he uses that as a reference. But in Romans 3:28 he puts the word ‘alone.’
Biased Bible Translation
Martin Luther translated the New Testament into German. He translated Romans 3:28 as follows:
We hold that the human will be justified without the works of the law but only by faith.
[Ray’s comment: They give the King James text and show that it is not there]
Luther admits to adding the word "only" in the text but insists that his reasons for doing so are good ones. [Ray’s comment: Isn’t this incredible.] Notice that he is using his doctrine of Sola Fide (faith only) to guide his translation rather than being faithful to the text. Here are his words:
I was not depending upon or following the nature of language when I inserted the word "solum" (alone) in Rom. 3 as the text itself, and St. Paul's meaning, urgently necessitated and demanded it. He is dealing with the main point of Christian doctrine in this passage - namely that we are justified by faith in Christ without any works of the Law.
I also know that in Rom. 3, the word "solum" is not present in either Greek or Latin text - the papists did not have to teach me that - it is fact! The letters s-o-l-a are not there. And these knotheads stare at them like cows at a new gate, while at the same time they do not recognize that it conveys the sense of the text[/u] - if the translation is to be clear and accurate, it belongs there.http://www.northforest.org/CatholicApologetics/Luther.html-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
So why did he put ‘alone’ there?… “It belongs there.” Why anybody can tell that, right, because it belongs there. Now he didn’t put it in Galatians 2:16, but guess who did? Now I will extol the virtues of the Concordance’s translation when that is deemed fair, but let me show you something. This is the reference that Martin Luther gives in his Scripture Romans 3:28, when he says ‘alone.’
Concordant Literal Version
Gal 2:16 having perceived that a man is not being justified by works of law, except alone through the faith of Christ Jesus,
That is just sheer spurious nonsense. They do show you, they always put the words from the Scripture in bold face and if they add words… and sometimes you need to add words to make it idiomatically correct, you know in reading it. They do put the word ‘alone’ in light face. But the point is, why did they put it there at all? It is not suggested and it is not in the original, so why did they put it there? Well A. E. Knoch… is that not a good German name. I think he’s got a heritage back to Martin Luther if you ask me. Where else did he come up with that? It’s not there, he just stuck it in there. Martin Luther just stuck it in there. Where did this ‘alone’ come from? It didn’t come from the Scriptures.
So although what I read you, and I didn’t read you the whole verse, I just read an excerpt from a verse from Paul and in James. I did that on purpose, so you could see how you could make it sound like it’s a absolute contradiction. You see?
So there is no Scripture that uses the phrase ‘faith alone’ or ‘only by faith’ or ‘faith only.’ Or ‘works alone’ or ‘only works.’ Neither one of those is used, you don’t find the word alone. Now you will find ‘faith alone’ one place in the Bible and it is in James. But guess what you find with that “faith alone”? You find the word “not.”
James 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath
not works,
is dead, being alone.
THE FAITH ‘OF’ CHRIST
Now why would Dobson and Tkach and Billy Graham and Martin Luther and all, why would they insert this word ‘alone’? What is there point? Why is it so important to them to pervert the Scriptures, to pervert the Word of God, to add to the Word of God, when God says, woe be to those that add to it? Why is it so important to them to do that?
[Comment from someone: Well I’ve heard you talk about, that they are trying to make it sound like it’s our faith and not Jesus Christ’s faith.] That’s one thing and you do find that some translations talk about faith ‘in’ Christ, even Rotherham. It’s plainly the faith ‘of’ Jesus Christ and he inserts the word ‘in’ (Gal. 2:16, 3:26; Php. 3:9; Col. 1:4). I know that Rotherham’s translation is pretty consistent, just like Concordant. But sometimes the human element gets in there and they just think, ‘it’s our faith in Christ.’ No it’s not, it’s the faith ‘of’ Christ. Big difference. That’s one point.
FAITH ALONE - NEEDS NO GOOD WORKS
[Comment from someone: Well if it says ‘faith alone,’ it gets them out of works.] Well yea, there you go, it gets you out of works. Now not only does it get you out of good works, but it actually pardons you for bad works. Because it’s faith alone.
Boy I’m telling you that man that sent me an email… remember he just so stretched that ‘alone.’ I mean he just went berserk, he was over the top with that. Of course he is also a practicing homosexual and you can probably see why he would want to do that.
Now let me show you something, there are several reasons why. It’s simple. It’s easy. I mean how do you just die and go to heaven? Just believe on Jesus, just faith in Jesus. Just believe in Jesus and you die and go to heaven.
But as I have said many times, you realize that almost all the prisoners in jail, who beat little old ladies... like that man who beat that one hundred year old woman for cryin out loud… who rape little children and cut their heads off, 90% of those people are Christians. You just ask them, do you believe in Jesus? ‘Yes, absolutely.’ Well then if you believe in Jesus your saved and yet you feel sorry for what you did, but it is immaterial. Whether you’re sorry or not sorry… you believe, that’s the main thing. You believe in Jesus. That’s why they add the word ‘alone.’ That’s where the perversion comes in.
I could give you many examples where you could say the fact and it would mean one thing, but then if you add the word on the end, alone, it would totally change the meaning. Because then you negate any other possibilities except this one. That may not be what the context of your conversation is at all.
So it’s easy, it’s simple, it just doesn’t require much. I’ll just give you one more reason. I mean there are many, but I’m just going to pick this one little one out, for a specific reason. Your conscious won’t be tortured when you can’t stop lusting after women. Now you think, ‘well where did you come up with that Ray?’
You know about thirty five years ago, when I was reading different evolutionists and so on and I was reading ‘The Deluge Story’ by Nelson. I ran across this one evolutionist and he is almost as big a name as Darwin. He is another generation removed or pretty close to Darwin, but big name in evolution. Someone ask him once why he was so passionate about trying to convince the world that there is no God and how we just evolved out of sea slime. Why? Okay if that’s what you believe, but why are you so passionate about it. Do you know what his answer was? He said, ‘I didn’t want to feel guilty. I didn’t want there to be a supreme being or a God telling me how to live my private sex life.’ One of the biggest name in evolution and what was his reason for his obsession with trying to prove there was no God? Because he didn’t want anybody telling him how to live his private sex life. That is if he wanted to cheat on his wife and have five concubines or whatever on the side, that’s nobody’s business but his own. That is quite an omission, but he did say it, it’s history.
“THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY”
Let me show you something. Sometimes it takes me years, I study the Bible and then I (finger snap) I see something. (Snap) well what is this. Wait I saw that before, (snap) but what is this. This is just the way my mind works.
Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Well duh, that was the seventh commandment.
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Why did Christ pull that one out? Why didn’t He talk about stealing? Why didn’t He talk about murder? Why didn’t He talk about something like that? Because there are lots of men who don’t steal, there are lots of men that don’t murder. The man hadn’t been born who doesn’t lust after women. That’s why. Watch this.
Mar 10:17 And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
v. 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou Me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
v. 19 Thou knowest the commandments,
Do not commit adultery…
What? Here is a rich man, with lots of money and what is the first thing that Christ smashed him with, “You know the commandments, don’t comment adultery.” Why do you think He started with that commandment? That’s not number 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6, that’s number 7. Why did He start with that one? Well he’s rich, he’s young, he’s probably handsome… this guy has got women. Maybe he’s married, but I guarantee he has got some women on the side.
I’ve told this story before, Garner Ted admitted at a ministerial conference, that he conservatively had at least two hundred women. He had a nice wife, I mean she was not glamorous, but she was very sweet. She was the sister to Molly Anthon, who was married to Dr. David Anthon. I was good friends with them. When we would go to the conference, Dr. Anthon would have us stay at his house, which is now worth about 2 or 3 million by the way. It’s about a long stones throw from the Wrigley Mansion on Orange Grove Boulevard.
But conservatively he had 200 women and of course a lot of the ministers were shocked at that. But this was a time when you know you just put the cards on the table. Now he didn’t say that in front of the whole conference, that was among just a select group actually. But it got out, you know something like that would get out.
But then he said, the only reason that there were not more in his ilk and that more of the men right there were not doing the same thing, he said, ‘was a lack of opportunity.’ Ted was rich, young, handsome and extremely charismatic. Boy that’s the kiss of death right there. Any where he went… everywhere he went, it was just like picking apples off a tree.
So Christ said to this young, rich, handsome man, “You know the commandments, do not commit adultery…” Sometimes only one or two carry the story in the gospels. We find this one in all the synoptic gospels.
Luke 18:20 Thou knowest the commandments,
Do not commit adultery…
Now let’s go to Romans 2, here is a man that never married, but he knew something about the male psyche.
Rom 2:22 Thou that sayest a man
should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery?
Now he talks about other sins as well, but he just starts off with that, adultery. Because every man can identify with that.
Rom 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
v. 9 For this,
Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal…
He starts off with adultery, you see what I’m saying? Why does he put that number one, why does he put that first?
James 2, we’ll go to the epistle of straw here and we’ll see if it’s an epistle of straw.
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
v. 11 For he that said,
Do not commit adultery…
What is this, do you see a pattern here? Do you see a pattern of how these men bring this in, “do not commit adultery.” That is the seventh commandment (Exodus 20:14
Thou shalt not commit adultery), it’s not the first or second or third or fourth, that’s the seventh commandment and they started off with it first.
Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
The law is spiritual. How did he know that? Well if we back up to verse 7, we’ll learn why.
Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said,
Thou shalt not covet.
Now that was different. Committing adultery is an act of the flesh. Coveting is an act of the mind. So Paul said coveting, the commandment says thou shalt not covet. Shalt not covet WHAT? “Thy neighbor’s WIFE” (Exo 20:17 ). Do you see it? Now it does say, “nor his ox...” too. But isn’t that interesting.