Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[EKnight]

My husband and I watched the Ben Stein movie "Expelled" about creationism vs. Darwinism.  Then he came across this article which references this guy Dawkins who is a hard core proponent of Darwinism and an atheist.  Anyway, thought some of you might be interested in reading the article.

http://online.wsj.com/wsjgate?subURI=%2Farticle%2FSB123724852205449221-email.html&nonsubURI=%2Farticle_email%2FSB123724852205449221-lMyQjAxMDI5MzE3NjIxNDY4Wj.html

Eileen

[Falconn003]

same old dead horse but this time it has new shoes  kewl


Rodger

[aqrinc]

Hi Eileen,

Darwin's theory of evolution has been thoroughly debunked by the over 80,000 fossils found at the Burgess Pass in the Canadian Rockies in 1909 by Charles D. Walcott. All the evidence was hidden for 80 years until 1989 and is available for anyone who cares to get the truth out.

Here is a link: http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/Burgess_Shale/ to help you with getting the correct information. You may have to do a little bit of reading but you will be properly armed after that, better yet Google it.

george .

[kenny]

theory is just that
Theory
THE'ORY, n. [L. theoria; Gr. to see or contemplate.]

1. Speculation; a doctrine or scheme of things, which terminates in speculation or contemplation, without a view to practice. It is here taken in an unfavorable sense, as implying something visionary.

[aqrinc]

.

theory is just that
Theory
THE'ORY, n. [L. theoria; Gr. to see or contemplate.]

1. Speculation; a doctrine or scheme of things, which terminates in speculation or contemplation, without a view to practice. It is here taken in an unfavorable sense, as implying something visionary.

Hi Kenny,

That is not necessarily so, all good scientific discovery has to have a workable theory. The theory of Relativity for example is now known as a law of relativity, time dilation was a theory until it could be proven in fact. Sorry but many dictionaries are as out of date as the flat earthers are today.

From yahoo answers: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060607111255AAFgg7g

what does e=mc2 stand for?

The energy contained with in an object of mass "m" is equal to that mass times the speed of light, squared.

Or Energy = mass X speed of light X speed of light

Einstein surprised the scientific world with this equation showing the equivalence of mass and energy. Because the speed of light is such a large number (299 792 458 m / s), much larger when it is squared (8.98755179 × 10^16 m^2/s^2), a very small amount of mass can yield a huge amount of energy. This is why nuclear reactions are so efficient - just a small amount of fissile material can power a city (or blow it up).

It wasn't until 37 years after Einstein first published this equation that it was shown experimentally. On December 2, 1942, man first initiated a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction, and controlled it.

In 2005, the centennial of Einstein’s great year, a team made the most accurate test yet of his equation. They measured the tiny change in mass of radioactive atoms before and after the atoms emitted gamma-rays. And they measured the energy of the rays. The missing mass times c² equalled the energy of the rays to within 4 hundred-thousandths of one percent.)
Source(s):
Einstein's voice explaining this himself: http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/voic...

The first nuclear reaction: http://hep.uchicago.edu/cp1.html
3 years ago


george.

[kenny]

hey george thanks for the links

i want you guys to know that I check out every link that is sent to me. couldn't find the one; http://hep.uchicago.edu/cp1.html, will have to check more on that after work today

and that is exactly what i am talking about
the theory in this post has already been proven wrong

[aqrinc]

That Theory may have been proven wrong. This Internet was a theory before it became what it is now.
This is an argument that has raged between religion and science for centuries. Problem is until lately
most Christians have been ignorant of The Sciences and most Scientist have been ignorant of The Spirit.

Read the papers from the 2008 Nashville Conference to get a better handle on this.

george. 

hey george thanks for the links

i want you guys to know that I check out every link that is sent to me. couldn't find the one; http://hep.uchicago.edu/cp1.html, will have to check more on that after work today

and that is exactly what i am talking about
the theory in this post has already been proven wrong

[kenny]

George
that is one of the many things that i am looking at now that i never looked at before i came to this forum and it has given me more ways to answer people when they ask
 thanks my freind

[musicman]

How many evolutionists does it take to buy a car?

A loaded question.

Why would they waste their money?  If they stand around a junk yard, eventually a tornado will pass through it and the car will be blown together through time and chance.  Their faith is way better than mine.