> General Discussions
But of the tree of knowledge of good...... thou shall NOT?
edpro.pits@yahoo.com:
I was just checking in the book of Genesis ch. 2 and I did not find the word "NOT" in the ch. 2 vs 17 in the original writings.
Does any one have any info on this?
Thanks in advance.
Edward
aqrinc:
Hi Edward,
Could you post a copy of that verse Genesis: 2 V 17: in the original writings, i would like to see your source material.
george. ???
edpro.pits@yahoo.com:
Genesis 2:17 But of the tree <`ets> of the knowledge <da`ath> of good <towb> and evil <ra`>, thou shalt not eat <'akal> of it: for in the day <yowm> that thou eatest <'akal> thereof thou shalt surely <muwth> die <muwth>.
The word's that are used are -Tree, Knowledge, Good, Evil, Eat: Day, Eat, Die, Die.
This verse is from a program called "Sword Searcher".
I don't know if E-Sword wold have the same writings but I assume it does.
mharrell08:
--- Quote from: Edward on March 21, 2009, 03:49:02 PM ---
I was just checking in the book of Genesis ch. 2 and I did not find the word "NOT" in the ch. 2 vs 17 in the original writings.
Does any one have any info on this?
Thanks in advance.
Edward
--- End quote ---
I have yet to find any Hebrew word which means 'not'...I think this is an issue of understanding the ancient hebrew language and not whether 1 exact word in Hebrew translates to another 1 exact word in english. Remember:
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die [there is no 1 hebrew word which means 'not' in this scripture]
1 Tim 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression [there would not be any 'transgression' if the word 'not' or any other negative connotation was not understood from the account of Adam & Eve partaking of the tree of knowledge]
Hope this helps,
Marques
edpro.pits@yahoo.com:
Genesis 3:11 And he said <'amar>, Who <miy> told <nagad> thee that thou wast naked <`eyrom>? Hast thou eaten <'akal> of the tree <`ets>, whereof I commanded thee <tsavah> that thou shouldest not <biltiy> eat <'akal>?
It's funny because in ch. 3:11 their is the negative. So I'm not sure why it's used here and not in ch. 2
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version