> Off Topic Discussions

Missing Link ?

<< < (4/4)

aqrinc:

My comments in blue.

A sample from news.sky.com about the discussion going on re: ida, and other missing links found on google. I have posted a couple of answers to the debate, below is a sample of one statement and my answer.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Missing-Link-Scientists-In-New-York-Unveil-Fossil-Of-Lemur-Monkey-Hailed-As-Mans-Earliest-Ancestor/Article/200905315284582?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15284582_Missing_Link%3A_Scientists_In_New_York_Unveil_Fossil_Of_Lemur_Monkey_Hailed_As_Mans_Earliest_Ancestor

The difference between the theory of evolution is that it is based on some sort of FACT. The bible is written by a primitive society to explain the things they did not understand and has since been changed by human hands anyway, most notably by a King who wished to make his divorces legal. I'm all for faith, but use your brains. Don't be blind, submissive sheep who never question anything because it's easier to just buy into a book written over a thousand years ago by a less informed society.
Posted By: Dustin

The above is obviously written by someone who has little knowledge of Scripture, and even less understanding of how our world and the universe operate as one entity. My Scripture can encompass your evolution, your evolution does not even understand Scripture.

Now below is a very well thought out answer.

All I have to say about this is "REMEMBER PILTDOWN MAN, AND LUCY, AND THE BIRD FOSSIL FROM THE ANDES." Each of these discoveries were touted by evolution scientists as the missing link to human and mammalian evolution. Each ended up being discredited and the community of evolutionists had egg on its collective face. With piltdown man, which was a hoax, the scientests jumped on the band wagon and eagerly proclaimed the discovery. With each of the discoveries mentioned it took time and close study for scientists with cooler heads to debunk them. I feel comfortable in saying that this will be the case again.

Remember the coding in animal and human DNA is very complex and extensive. This kind of data does not come into existance by chance, it has to be programmed. That being the case, where does the programming come from? From our supposed animla ancestors? I hardly think so.


Posted By :Bill Chiarulli
george. :)

aqrinc:

More from newssky.com Ok Off to work i go now, will be peeking in to see if any more good stuff is available.


--- Quote ---ok here's the deal for all of you doubters out there:
I'm a doubter too, i think we all are in our nature, i DO NOT have all the answers, but i think that religous people dont want you guys to destroy their hopes that there's no God since this world is screwed up completely and that's a fact we can ALL agree on. And that's why i came with the greatest solution as somebody who is searching for God out of hope that we ALL have deep inside of us for a greater meanning: EVOLUTION AND CREATION DOES NOT CLASH!

Now start arguing about things and lets see what comes out of it! (;

I dont care if i came from a freaking monkey as long as God made it happened! I think when it was said that God created us in his image he meant something deeper on a spiritual level than our appearance and i dont know why monkeys are so bad, they ARE God's creation too, wonderful and inteligent!

Posted By: Iris

--- End quote ---

Here is a better reading of the creation of humanity Story. This shows it is a continuing process not a finished product. Creating and Creates (a continuing process) as opposed to Created (finished).

Gen 1:27 (CLV)
And creating is the Elohim humanity in His image. In the image of the Elohim He creates it. Male and female He creates them.

george. :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page