Dear Sorin,
The literal scriptures are almost too much for us. Killings, rapes, murders etc., etc. But remember that Ray has told us that the bible is a great parable. And the first principal for us in understanding His word is; first comes the natural and then comes the spiritual. The first Adam was natural and the last Adam is spiritual. The old man, who is carnal, is natural; the new man, is spiritual. The scriptures are examples, metaphors and parables and they represent the whole picture of God's purpose. God wants children and God wants His children to be just like Him. He is very jealous over us. The old testament was us under the law. Death reigned in us and the law made us guilty. God wanted no part of us under the law of sin and death. He wants to kill all of the old in us and have us entirely to Himself in newness.
It is impossible to understand this with our old (man) mind. God has abolished the old; murdered it, killed it, ground it to powder. And now, through His Son has nailed it (all the old) to His cross. Therefore, in God's mind, all is new in Him. The old is gone and all is new.
Today, God is still murdering our old man with all its carnality and wickedness. Paul said, "I die daily.....we are buried with Him." Think of the scriptures as God and you. The old testament is the old you; carnal, wicked, lost under the condemnation of the law, dead in your sins. The new testament is the new you; being saved, under grace, no condemnation because your now in Christ. Old things are passing away and behold all thing are becoming new.
I hope this helps a little.
In His love,
Dwight
I understand the difference between kill and murder as Ray pointed out, but I still don't see how 'smite them' versus 'love your enemies' is not God changing His mind. I mean in the OT he used the Jews to kill off many Gentile nations, smite every male and even to take their virgin women for themselves, now we are told to not even look at a woman to lust after her.
I sincerely hope that I do not get banned, or get this thread locked. I am a little unclear about
whether we are permitted to dissagree or not. I have the same question as sorin about the appearance
that God changed somewhere between the pre Christ age and the age of Jesus.
Most of the replies to sorin in this thread were just an attempt to justify the actions of the old testament God in my opinion.
Of course God needs no justification, or reason for anything that He does. He is God!
That still does not answer the question, did God change? In the old testament God had people hacking up
other people for no apparent reason other than that they happen to be sitting on some land that God wanted to give
to someone else. O.K. that is a little stretch of the scriptures, but you know what I am talking about. If a group of strangers marched into your town and killed every man there, you would be hard pressed to not call it murder. So I think you are splitting hairs trying to draw a distinction between thou shall not kill, or thou shall not murder.
Then in the new testament, God tells us not only that we should not hurt our enemies, but in fact we should love them.
I don't see where this has anything to do with relavent or absolute. This is a question concerning the
apparent attributes of God. And did they change.
I have to agree with Pax Vobiscum. I read the old testament because there is much there that I need to learn.
But I tend to place all of my faith in what Jesus had to say while he lived among us.
Sorin, I hope that you got the answer that you sought in the replies posted above. I respect and love all of these people,
and really appreciate their attempts to help when we have questions.
But I fear that none of the answers were of much help to me concerning this particular issue. Even Ray's reply left me still needing an answer.
Tim
I'm in agreement with Ray that one is relative while the other is absolute.
With God, the absolute truth is that he uses natural, phyical things of this life to bring about his purposes and plans. In this he never changed.
The absolute in this is always God. He uses the physical to emerge with the spiritual. This is not God changing at all. The old covenant and its ten commandments were a schoolmaster for us so that we would know what the difference is between right and wrong. When Christ's spirit enters and changes the lives of them that believe we no longer need laws written on tablets of stone because God's higher spiritual laws will be wriiten on our hearts and minds. The spiritual is the fulfillment of the natural. This is God's way.
I believe that the leson that the OT contains is that even with God helping them in clearly physical ways, carnal minded man was still not going to find salvation without Christ.
The Physical Laws, Kings, prophets, etc. of the OT are for our benefit far more than it was for theirs. They had God as their leader, he spoke to them and gave them all amounts of power, wealth and knowledge, but not one person who had it all, (to my knowledge) ever kept in good standing with God, not even Solomon. Obviously God's people did not learn in those days, for they were very much part of the world, just as God planned.
Darren
You comment : But what is more important, is that he is the WAS, the IS and WHICH WILL BECOME.
I know of no place anywhere in the Scripture where it says that God will BECOME.
God is TO COME does not mean He will Become. God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow.
Peace to you
Arcturus :)
TRUTHSEEKER,
I am OK with being confused with the Topic, but thanks :)
Peace,
John
TRUTHSEEKER,
I am OK with being confused with the Topic, but thanks :)
Peace,
John
I am so glad you got a good nites sleep!! ;D
;D Me too! While going over the replies to this subject with my wife this morning she made a comment on it that made it even more clearer. She said, 'His methods changed, not His purpose' , this works for me.
Peace,
John
gena
Dear Pax.
If we use a parental model, I certainly understand how parents change tactics while the plan remains -- but it is still a change.
Even the appearance of Jesus is a change (if we accept the full divinity/personhood of Jesus). If He were fully God in the flesh, that certainly is a change.
There are examples after examples of the attributes of God changing (I will allow that the divine plan has not for argument's sake) in the Bible; so it is quite difficult to understand Malachi's "I change not" statement.
"I change not" and the "hic hoc hodie" statments in the NT do not specify -- they are quite general. There is nothing that says "My divine plan is the same yesterday, today and to come" or "My plan changeth not."
There are changes in relationships, circumstance, and attributes throughout our Bible.
Help me out, here.
Peace
Hi All.
Although Kat’s analogy is a good one, it is not perfect and only goes so far.
In response to Tim's modification to Kat’s analogy, we need to remember that the parent is not completely sovereign. The parent did not create the other little girl, nor did the parent create the bicycle. The parent does not own everything and did not create everything. The parent’s rights are therefore limited. The parent is also not perfect or completely just. God is both perfect and just.
The pivotal point is sovereignty.
In reality God is completely & fully sovereign. God is not limited. He is the very creator and owner of every single thing in every single dimension in the universe and beyond. He therefore can do as He pleases. He is the Sovereign God! :)
Hope this helps.
God bless.
Andrevan.
I got it! This is how, and why God did not contradict himself! The Ten Commandments were given to the Jews, for the Jews [only]. In other words, thou shall not commit adultery, thou shall not kill [murder], and all a that was given to the Jews to not do those things unto another Jew only. They didn't mean you can't rape the heathens females, just not the Jewish ones. It didn't mean thou shall not murder a heahen baby, just not a Jewish one.
It's still pretty sad, but God is God, and there's nothing we can do about it.
That's how I view that, but I'm still trying to see how that justifies God though. Meaning, as being a God of love.
AMEN! :D
Well, we've just about picked this bone clean.