bible-truths.com/forums

=> General Discussions => Topic started by: Roy Monis on August 13, 2008, 12:07:46 PM

Title: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 13, 2008, 12:07:46 PM
Hi! Everybody

Has Ray at any time addressed the above Scripture anywhere. If so could you please let me have the link? It concerns the Deity of Jesus Christ. It is preying on my mind since one of my previous posts died a natural death.   

I am reminded here of; “Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. “For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it." (Matt.7:13-14), which is a lonely and difficult road.

Thank you.

God bless you brothers and sisters in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 13, 2008, 02:15:37 PM
Hi Roy,

Yes he did, Try Who is Jesus and Who is the Father  i think its in there, but dont quote me on that.  Also try these scriptures.

Acts 17:28-29
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. 29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.

Romans 1:19-32
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; F6 for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so F7 that they are without excuse:

Col 2:8-10
8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments F8 of the world, and not after Christ. 9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. 10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

In Jesus

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Samarnon on August 13, 2008, 11:57:35 PM
Hi Roy,

I think the Trinity paper of L.Ray has it in "Who and What is Jesus Christ?"

God bless brother,
Joy
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 14, 2008, 09:57:56 PM


Hi Roy,

This is from the 2006 Mobile Bible Conference, part 2 HOW DID JESUS DO “THE FATHER’S WILL”  Hope this helps  :)

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,3633.msg27126.html#msg27126 ---

1Cor 8:6  but there is to us only one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him;  and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we by Him.

Is Jesus Christ something?  Yes.  What is He?  He’s of God.
All is of Him, of the One God.  All is of Him, Jesus Christ is of Him.  It interesting that Jesus Christ is called the Firstfruit in 1 Cor --

 1Cor 15:20  But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the Firstfruit of those who slept.

In Gene. 1:1 it says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” 

But that’s not the way that word (beginning) is translated in most places in the Bible.  Let’s step back a second, lets decide who created the heaven and the earth, ok.   

In John 1:1  “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

A guy argued with me for 3 months, back and forth, telling me that was the Father,
“In the beginning was the Word.”   
The right order of the words in the linear is, ‘and God was the word.’ 
“ and the Word was WITH God, and the Word was God.  The same was in the beginning WITH God.”   
Now it’s pretty hard for something that is something, to be with itself, see what I’m saying, that don’t quite work grammatically, does it. 

In John 1:3  “All things were made through Him, and without Him was not any thing made that was made.” 
So  whatever this Word was, He made everything,  everything was made by Him. 

v. 4  “In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.” 
What is light?  This light that shines in darkness, what was this light?  It was the Word.
What did the Word do?  It  made all things and nothing was made that He didn’t make. 

v. 6  “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.” 
v. 7  “He came as a witness, to bear witness about the Light, that all might believe through Him.”   
v. 8  “He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the Light.”
v. 9 “That was the true Light, which lights every man that comes into the world.” 
v. 10 “He was in the world and the world was made by Him.”
We just read that He was in the world and the world was made by Him. 
It repeats it (verse 3 and 10).  And the world knew Him not.

v. 11  “He came to His own, and His own received Him not.”
v. 12  “But as many as received Him, He gave to them power to become the sons of God,
even to them that believe on His name,”
v. 13  “which are born(begotten) not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh,
nor of the will of man, but of God.”
v.14  “And the Word made flesh, and dwelt  among us with the glory of the only begotten of the Father,
full of grace and of truth.”
v.15  “John bore witness of Him and cried out, saying, This was He of whom I spoke:
He who comes after me has been before me, for He was preceding me.”
v.16  “And out of His fullness we all have received, and grace for grace.”
v.17  “For the Law came through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.”
Who is this Word, who is as with the Father, who was with God, who made all things,
who was the light of men, who was made flesh, who dwelt among men,
who was the only begotten of the Father?  JESUS CHRIST !

v. 18  “No one has seen God at any time; the Only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father,
He has declared Him.”
In the bosom of the Father, That means a close intimate relationship,
He(Jesus Christ) has declared Him(the Father). 
Nobody has ever known anything about God the Father, except through Jesus Christ.  Before the birth of Jesus Christ in Bethlehem, nobody on the face of the earth, ever knew anything about God the Father. 
But didn’t they know about God(in the OT)?   That was Jesus Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 15, 2008, 04:37:11 PM


Hi Roy,

This is from the 2006 Mobile Bible Conference, part 2 HOW DID JESUS DO “THE FATHER’S WILL”  Hope this helps  :)

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,3633.msg27126.html#msg27126 ---

1Cor 8:6  but there is to us only one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him;  and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we by Him.

Is Jesus Christ something?  Yes.  What is He?  He’s of God.
All is of Him, of the One God.  All is of Him, Jesus Christ is of Him.  It interesting that Jesus Christ is called the Firstfruit in 1 Cor --

 1Cor 15:20  But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the Firstfruit of those who slept.

In Gene. 1:1 it says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” 

But that’s not the way that word (beginning) is translated in most places in the Bible.  Let’s step back a second, lets decide who created the heaven and the earth, ok.   

In John 1:1  “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

A guy argued with me for 3 months, back and forth, telling me that was the Father,
“In the beginning was the Word.”   
The right order of the words in the linear is, ‘and God was the word.’ 
“ and the Word was WITH God, and the Word was God.  The same was in the beginning WITH God.”   
Now it’s pretty hard for something that is something, to be with itself, see what I’m saying, that don’t quite work grammatically, does it. 

In John 1:3  “All things were made through Him, and without Him was not any thing made that was made.” 
So  whatever this Word was, He made everything,  everything was made by Him. 

v. 4  “In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.” 
What is light?  This light that shines in darkness, what was this light?  It was the Word.
What did the Word do?  It  made all things and nothing was made that He didn’t make. 

v. 6  “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.” 
v. 7  “He came as a witness, to bear witness about the Light, that all might believe through Him.”   
v. 8  “He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the Light.”
v. 9 “That was the true Light, which lights every man that comes into the world.” 
v. 10 “He was in the world and the world was made by Him.”
We just read that He was in the world and the world was made by Him. 
It repeats it (verse 3 and 10).  And the world knew Him not.

v. 11  “He came to His own, and His own received Him not.”
v. 12  “But as many as received Him, He gave to them power to become the sons of God,
even to them that believe on His name,”
v. 13  “which are born(begotten) not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh,
nor of the will of man, but of God.”
v.14  “And the Word made flesh, and dwelt  among us with the glory of the only begotten of the Father,
full of grace and of truth.”
v.15  “John bore witness of Him and cried out, saying, This was He of whom I spoke:
He who comes after me has been before me, for He was preceding me.”
v.16  “And out of His fullness we all have received, and grace for grace.”
v.17  “For the Law came through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.”
Who is this Word, who is as with the Father, who was with God, who made all things,
who was the light of men, who was made flesh, who dwelt among men,
who was the only begotten of the Father?  JESUS CHRIST !

v. 18  “No one has seen God at any time; the Only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father,
He has declared Him.”
In the bosom of the Father, That means a close intimate relationship,
He(Jesus Christ) has declared Him(the Father). 
Nobody has ever known anything about God the Father, except through Jesus Christ.  Before the birth of Jesus Christ in Bethlehem, nobody on the face of the earth, ever knew anything about God the Father. 
But didn’t they know about God(in the OT)?   That was Jesus Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat




###########################


Hi! Kath

Thanks for your response.

1Cor.8:6    No problem there at all. All things are through Him including Jesus Christ the Lord, through whom are all things including mankind. I know all that and it’s perfectly acceptable.

Is Jesus Christ something?  What is He? He is of God. Now here we have gone of track a bit. What is He – He is not of God, He is God. That’s what I understand John 1:1 to be saying. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.”
 
Now you’ve gone off at a tangent to 1Cor.15:20.  Let's stick with this for now. We‘re not up to that yet as we’ve only just established that the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God, in His Bosom, not created. “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.”  (John 1:18).

Now let us take Gen.1:1 ---"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth". Here then we have the Only Begotten Son who has come forth (born of, given birth to) out of the Father. There is no Scripture that I can find to say He was created. He is the Creator commissioned by the Father to create. If Christ was created we would be worshipping a creature and not the Creator.

As far as 1Cor.15:20  which comes into the picture quite a long time later, yes, He is the First Fruit of those who slept, now as Jesus Christ the Word and acclaimed by the Father;  “….that God has fulfilled this promise to our children in that He raised up Jesus, as it is also written in the second Psalm, ‘YOU ARE MY SON; TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU.’”  (Acts 13:33).

There are a plethora of Scriptures to say that the Father Begat the Son/Word but none to say that He created Him.

This is what is worrying me and I can’t follow it. The God that spoke with Moses and Abraham in the wilderness was Jesus Christ and He announced that He was God. This is the same Jesus Christ we are talking about here so if He was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob how could He have been created. If He was created He'd be no different to an angel, archangel or them for that matter, all created beings.

Everything else that you have said is perfectly clear and understandable, the only sticking point is the distinguishing between the meaning of the words Begotten and created.

At the moment this is how I see it and can’t see any other alternative. Perhaps I’ve missed something on which you could throw some light?

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ and sorry for the trouble.

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 15, 2008, 05:30:35 PM
Hi Roy,

Quote
Now let us take Gen.1:1 ---"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth". Here then we have the Only Begotten Son who has come forth (born of, given birth to) out of the Father

You're saying it right there, your just not seeing it.


The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   3439  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
monogenhvß from (3441) and (1096)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Monogenes 4:737,606
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
mon-og-en-ace'      Adjective 
 
 Definition
single of its kind, only
used of only sons or daughters (viewed in relation to their parents) used of Christ, denotes the only begotten son of God 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 9
only begotten 6, only 2, only child 1
 
   KJV Verse Count   
Luke 3
John 4
Hebrews 1
1 John 1


 Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   1096  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
givnomai a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Ginomai 1:681,117
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ghin'-om-ahee      Verb 
 
 Definition
to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to be, receive being to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen
of events to arise, appear in history, come upon the stage
of men appearing in public to be made, finished
of miracles, to be performed, wrought to become, be made 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 678
be 255, come to pass 82, be made 69, be done 63, come 52, become 47, God forbid + (3361)&version=kjv 15, arise 13, have 5, be fulfilled 3, be married to 3, be preferred 3, not translated 14, miscellaneous 4, vr done 2
 


King James Dictionary

Begotten


To have born; brought forth.
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is BEGOTTEN of him. (1 John 5:1)

Dictionary of Words from the King James Bible. Public Domain. Copy freely.

You're saying the same thing.  Created, begotten, made, brought forth, come to pass, etc etc. Your on it.

 
Col 1:15 - Show Context
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation

How do you get an image?  The camera makes an image of you.  The camera created/begat/made/brought forth an image of you.  How does the Father get an image of Himself?  Well really he can't.  He's Spirit.  He's invisible. 
 
Ro 1:20 - Show Context
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
 
The Father begat/created/made/brought forth an image of Himself.  Its like the Father took a picture of Himself to see what he looked like, instead of just a lifeless picture He create/begat/made/ brought for a being that will represent Him or better speaking be Him.

I look at like this.  If i'm God and i'm Spirit and i know that im going to make a physical world where that wont be able to see spirit, how can i get them to see me.  They will know me by my Word, but how will they see me.  Hmmmm i know i will create/begot/bring forth/make an being in my image for them who will have everything that I am in Him. ( I could go longer in this, but you get the jist)

Like i said earlier, you got it!! You just aint seeing it.

In Jesus,

Anthony

ps.  I tried to do all the apostrophes and the like.  You are killing me! :) ;) :D ;D 8)



Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 15, 2008, 08:37:39 PM

Hi Roy,

Quote
There are a plethora of Scriptures to say that the Father Begat the Son/Word but none to say that He created Him.

This is what is worrying me and I can’t follow it. The God that spoke with Moses and Abraham in the wilderness was Jesus Christ and He announced that He was God. This is the same Jesus Christ we are talking about here so if He was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob how could He have been created. If He was created He'd be no different to an angel, archangel or them for that matter, all created beings.

Good answer Anthony.  
Here is the Scripture for Christ being created.

Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; (KJV)

Rev 3:14 And to the messenger of the ecclesia in Laodicea write: 'Now this is saying the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, and God's Creative Original:" (CLV)

Christ did come out of the Father as all things have, but we can see in that Scripture in Revelation that Jesus Christ was the very first of the Father creation.  We don't know how long it was or what happened between Christ's creation and when He created the universe.  It is my belief that Jesus Christ was created to be over (as God) and in charge of this creation (by the power of the Father) and I think that is what is being said in John 1.

John 1:3  All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.

Here is excerpts from the 'Trinity' paper that I think speak about this.

http://bible-truths.com/trinity.html ---------------------

Jesus said He didn't need to "rob" God to be equal with Him. Why? Because the Father freely GAVE Jesus all that He had and possessed.  Jesus had ALL power and ALL authority and ALL judgment in heaven and earth.  Were these things the natural possessions of Jesus seeing that He is supposedly a third equal part of this trinity?   No, my friend. God GAVE Jesus all these things -- they had an origin and the origin is GOD THE FATHER.

Jesus Christ will be SUBJECT to God His Father for all eternity (See I Cor. 15:24-28).
v
v
Colosians 1:15-16 refers to Christ as the "firstborn" (PROTOTOKOS)=originator/source of ALL God's creation. John 1:1, Heb 1, and Col 1 tell us that christ made ALL things. Don't insert the brackets and the word "other things" like the erroneous JW's try to do.That is not in the text.
v
v
[Ray Replies]

You suggest that Heb. 1:3 says that Jesus is the "substance" of God. I am not sure how you are using that word. Substance can mean both the "essence" of something or the "material" part of something. Jesus Christ had a physical body and could be seen, whereas God does not have a physical body (God is SPIRIT) and God cannot be seen as He is INVISIBLE. It is interesting to note that the KJV translates this word "[h]upo'stasis" into 'substance' but one time in Scripture and that is not in Heb. 1:3, but in Heb. 11:1, Now faith IS the SUBSTANCE of things hoped for, the EVIDENCE of things not seen."  Now that translation should receive some sort of prize for one the WORST possible translations in all Scripture.  

Paul said we are to live by FAITH and not SIGHT [or perception]. What is "substance and evidence" but things that can be seen, weighed and perceived? And things that can be SEEN AND HANDLED (as
in "substance") don't require faith in the first place. Faith is was is required when there IS NOT SUBSTANCE OR EVIDENCE! An infidel can believe in things he can see and handle!  Faith is the "assumption" or "confidence" or "assurance" ASIDE from any substance or evidence!

Possibly the Greek "[h]upo'stasis" can be used to mean substance, however, not in any Scripture that I am aware of.  And the same is true with Heb. 1:3. Jesus does not "consist" of the "substance" of God Who is invisible, but rather Jesus is the VISIBLE IMAGE of the INVISIBLE GOD. God does not bear this visible substance which can be seen, therefore He send His Son in a VISIBLE form that can be seen (and heard).  

This same Greek word is found in other Scriptures, but it is NEVER translated "substance." Notice for example, II Cor. 9:4, and 11:17, Heb. 3:14. If the Father were to take to Himself a Form or a Substance then what we would see is CHRIST. Christ IS the express image, form, (or substance if you insist) of God His Father. However, the difference is that when Christ takes on all of the Father's form, image, character, etc., etc., we can see and hear and touch Him with our hands, but we still cannot see, hear or touch our Heavenly Father with our physical hands. Jesus said that when we SEE Him we SEE the Father even though the Father is INVISIBLE! Granted, this is a little higher than theology 101.

You state, "Man, don't you believe the Bible? Colosians 1:15-16 refers to Christ as the 'firstborn' (PROTOTOKOS)=originator/source of ALL God's creation." Do you really think I never read that Scripture or don't believe it?

But notice how you answer this question in your own statement:  "Christ...the source of all GOD's creation."  There it is "God's" creation. There is always that ONE before and above Christ--God, His Father and His God!  It took REAL POWER to create the universe didn't it?   Where do you suppose Christ got that power? Man, don't you believe the Bible? (Just kidding).

Now seriously, Mat. 2818, "ALL POWER is GIVEN unto me in heaven and in earth."  There it is again, my friend. The FATHER is always in charge. And again, I Cor. 15:27-28,

"For He [the Father] hath put all things under His [Christ's] feet. But when He [the Father] saith, all things are put under Him [Christ] it is MANIFEST THAT HE [GOD THE FATHER] IS EXCEPTED, which did put all things under Him."  

And not verse 28:

"And when all things shall be subdued unto Him [Christ], then shall the Son ALSO HIMSELF BE SUBJECT unto HIM [HIS GOD AND FATHER] that PUT all things under Him, that God may be all in all."

No trinity here, my friend. In fact the Holy Spirit is not even mentioned in these most bold declaration of God through Paul.

Rather than say "Christ is not the supreme deity" let me restate it so that you can hopefully and clearly see the concept that I am presenting. Paul tells us that God is a "family" in Ephesians. Jesus Christ is not the HEAD of that family of God, but rather the FATHER is the head and just as I quoted to you from the Scriptures in I Cor. 15, Jesus Christ will always be SUBJECT TO THE FATHER and no the other way around. Cannot you agree with that statement in Verse 28, "...then shall the SON also Himself be SUBJECT unto HIM [THE FATHER]...?  And let me just say that that word for subject in this verse is the same word used in Luke 10:20, "Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits ARE SUBJECT unto you..." Since the spirits are "subject" to the apostles, how could we ever contend that they are EQUAL as in a "trinity?"

As far as Christ going around claiming He was God, He did not, however, I will concede that He did say before Abraham was "I AM."  Even when Pilate asked directly whether or not He was the Son of God, Christ refused to answer Pilate directly. If you noticed I made the statement at least twice in my paper, "Jesus IS GOD" "Christ is God."

Gotta run. Till next time. . .
Ray
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 16, 2008, 01:37:34 PM
Hi Roy,

Quote
Now let us take Gen.1:1 ---"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth". Here then we have the Only Begotten Son who has come forth (born of, given birth to) out of the Father

You're saying it right there, your just not seeing it.


The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   3439  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
monogenhvß from (3441) and (1096)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Monogenes 4:737,606
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
mon-og-en-ace'      Adjective 
 
 Definition
single of its kind, only
used of only sons or daughters (viewed in relation to their parents) used of Christ, denotes the only begotten son of God 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 9
only begotten 6, only 2, only child 1
 
   KJV Verse Count   
Luke 3
John 4
Hebrews 1
1 John 1


 Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   1096  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
givnomai a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Ginomai 1:681,117
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ghin'-om-ahee      Verb 
 
 Definition
to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to be, receive being to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen
of events to arise, appear in history, come upon the stage
of men appearing in public to be made, finished
of miracles, to be performed, wrought to become, be made 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 678
be 255, come to pass 82, be made 69, be done 63, come 52, become 47, God forbid + (3361)&version=kjv 15, arise 13, have 5, be fulfilled 3, be married to 3, be preferred 3, not translated 14, miscellaneous 4, vr done 2
 


King James Dictionary

Begotten


To have born; brought forth.
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is BEGOTTEN of him. (1 John 5:1)

Dictionary of Words from the King James Bible. Public Domain. Copy freely.

You're saying the same thing.  Created, begotten, made, brought forth, come to pass, etc etc. Your on it.

 
Col 1:15 - Show Context
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation

How do you get an image?  The camera makes an image of you.  The camera created/begat/made/brought forth an image of you.  How does the Father get an image of Himself?  Well really he can't.  He's Spirit.  He's invisible. 
 
Ro 1:20 - Show Context
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
 
The Father begat/created/made/brought forth an image of Himself.  Its like the Father took a picture of Himself to see what he looked like, instead of just a lifeless picture He create/begat/made/ brought for a being that will represent Him or better speaking be Him.

I look at like this.  If i'm God and i'm Spirit and i know that im going to make a physical world where that wont be able to see spirit, how can i get them to see me.  They will know me by my Word, but how will they see me.  Hmmmm i know i will create/begot/bring forth/make an being in my image for them who will have everything that I am in Him. ( I could go longer in this, but you get the jist)

Like i said earlier, you got it!! You just aint seeing it.

In Jesus,

Anthony

ps.  I tried to do all the apostrophes and the like.  You are killing me! :) ;) :D ;D 8)






Hi! Anthony

I understand what you are saying. Father is Spirit and no one has seen Him. Perfectly correct. It also says that the Word was with God/Father and that the Word was God. The Word also is Spirit like the Father, an image of Him. Let's look at the wording; "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being." (Jn.1:1-2). There is no mention of Jesus at this stage of creation, it was the Word, the direct image of the Father, God, whom the Father gave birth to, Begotten, that did the work of creation. The Creator God. "I will tell of the decree: Jehovah said unto me, Thou art my son; This day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I will give thee the nations for thine inheritance, And the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; Thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel."  (Ps.2:7-9). Begotten not created


Between this period and the creation of man, a body was prepared in readiness in accord to God's preordained plan for the Word. "But a body didst thou prepare for me; 6In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hadst no pleasure: Then said I, Lo, I am come (In the roll of the book it is written of me) To do thy will, O God."(Heb.10:5-7). This is the Word speaking.

Now we come to the birth of Jesus. "But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, 'Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. She will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matt.1:20-21). "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth."  (Jn.1:14).

The Word entered the body prepared in Psalm 2:7-9 and was impregnated into Mary by the Holy Spirit of the Father. Now we have Jesus as the Word of God/the Son of God with the quality of Deity. Jesus is now the Word, the CREATOR GOD, with full authority from the Father.
   
This is in accord with Ray's teaching, everything by Scripture and verified by Scripture. It is also in accord with the Word of God; "Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so."   (Acts 17:11).

As far as Revelation 3:14 is concerned; “To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God, says this:" Please check the superior fig. or reference number alongside beginning in the centre column of the Bible for its correct interpretation. You'll see it is a noun and means God the first born over all creation. The CREATOR of, but not part of.

I am not in anyway doing wrong, I'm following Ray's and the Bible's teaching to the letter. If I am wrong then prove it wrong and I'll willingly accept it. After all we are here to learn the truth and not accept anything but the truth. Is that not so? Please read all I have written very carefully before jumping to a conclusion and replying that is all I ask.

This proves that Jesus the man was created but Jesus the Word whom we worship and follow was Born of God and as such is God in His own right and not part of the creation, rather the CREATOR.

I missed this in Ray's paper on the Trinity theory, I printed it out for any that might want to argue the point, but didn't bother to read it myself because I've never believed in it in the first place since Matthew 1:18 & 20 knocks it on the head right away with no way out. End of story.

I know this may seem argumentative but it's not intended that way, I mean well, I'm in search of the truth as I'm sure we all are. I was only alerted to this when Samson came out with the statement "Thank the Father for creating Jesus Christ." This made me wonder why no one had questioned it, that's why I've raised it here. Not to criticize or debunk but to learn and the only way to learn is to ask questions.

NOW PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IT IS THAT I'M NOT SEEING? Because I can't see what you mean by that.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     


     
 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 16, 2008, 02:36:35 PM

Hi Roy,

Quote
As far as Revelation 3:14 is concerned; “To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God, says this:" Please check the superior fig. or reference number alongside beginning in the centre column of the Bible for its correct interpretation. You'll see it is a noun and means God the first born over all creation. The CREATOR of, but not part of.

This is from the transcript of the Nashville Conference 2007 WHO AND WHAT IS JESUS? & WHO IS HIS FATHER?

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,4472.0.html ----

"These things says the Amen [Jesus] the faithful and True Witness [Jesus] the beginning of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14).
There are three theories about how Christ came about.
1)  He came about for the first time as a human being, out of a physical mother.  That was the first time Christ ever existed.
2)  He was created sometime before that and them came into the mother.
3)  Then you have, He is eternal, He always existed.

Very few believe He just came into existence as a physical human being, for the first time ever.  Though I had one man argue with me for weeks.  He said, ‘no, in the beginning was the Word and it was the Father, that the Word was God and not Christ‘.  Not too many people believe that, but some do. 
Most people follow the Christian tradition and they believe no. 3, that Christ was eternal, He’s part of the trinity and He’s always existed.
But of course the truth is no. 2, Jesus Christ was created.

-"the Origin of God’s creation" (James Moffatt).
-"God’s creative Original" (Concordant Literal New Testament).
-"The Chief of the creation of God" (Young’s Translation).
-"the Origin, and Beginning, and Author of God’s creation" (The Amplified New Testament).

Well the truth of the matter is from those translations, you can’t actually prove that He is not eternal, by that statement.  But you say, yea He’s the beginning, He started the creation, He‘s eternal.  So to me it’s a proof that He is the beginning.  Not the beginning of what God has created on the earth, but He Himself is ‘the beginning’ of God’s creation.  It depends how you emphasize.  You have the same sentence with two totally different meanings. 
It’s like, I tell you this day, today I’m telling you, you shall be in paradise.  Or.  I tell you, today you shall be in paradise.  And there‘s this one.  What’s that up in the road ahead.  Or.  What’s that up in the road, a head.
So we won’t place a lot of emphasis on that one.  But one thing that we do know from that one is, before He was human, He was there!  So we know whatever His beginning was, He was there, at the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 16, 2008, 05:46:45 PM

Hi Roy,

Quote
There are a plethora of Scriptures to say that the Father Begat the Son/Word but none to say that He created Him.

This is what is worrying me and I can’t follow it. The God that spoke with Moses and Abraham in the wilderness was Jesus Christ and He announced that He was God. This is the same Jesus Christ we are talking about here so if He was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob how could He have been created. If He was created He'd be no different to an angel, archangel or them for that matter, all created beings.

Good answer Anthony. 
Here is the Scripture for Christ being created.

Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; (KJV)

Rev 3:14 And to the messenger of the ecclesia in Laodicea write: 'Now this is saying the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, and God's Creative Original:" (CLV)

Christ did come out of the Father as all things have, but we can see in that Scripture in Revelation that Jesus Christ was the very first of the Father creation.  We don't know how long it was or what happened between Christ's creation and when He created the universe.  It is my belief that Jesus Christ was created to be over (as God) and in charge of this creation (by the power of the Father) and I think that is what is being said in John 1.

John 1:3  All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.

Here is excerpts from the 'Trinity' paper that I think speak about this.

http://bible-truths.com/trinity.html ---------------------

Jesus said He didn't need to "rob" God to be equal with Him. Why? Because the Father freely GAVE Jesus all that He had and possessed.  Jesus had ALL power and ALL authority and ALL judgment in heaven and earth.  Were these things the natural possessions of Jesus seeing that He is supposedly a third equal part of this trinity?   No, my friend. God GAVE Jesus all these things -- they had an origin and the origin is GOD THE FATHER.

Jesus Christ will be SUBJECT to God His Father for all eternity (See I Cor. 15:24-28).
v
v
Colosians 1:15-16 refers to Christ as the "firstborn" (PROTOTOKOS)=originator/source of ALL God's creation. John 1:1, Heb 1, and Col 1 tell us that christ made ALL things. Don't insert the brackets and the word "other things" like the erroneous JW's try to do.That is not in the text.
v
v
[Ray Replies]

You suggest that Heb. 1:3 says that Jesus is the "substance" of God. I am not sure how you are using that word. Substance can mean both the "essence" of something or the "material" part of something. Jesus Christ had a physical body and could be seen, whereas God does not have a physical body (God is SPIRIT) and God cannot be seen as He is INVISIBLE. It is interesting to note that the KJV translates this word "[h]upo'stasis" into 'substance' but one time in Scripture and that is not in Heb. 1:3, but in Heb. 11:1, Now faith IS the SUBSTANCE of things hoped for, the EVIDENCE of things not seen."  Now that translation should receive some sort of prize for one the WORST possible translations in all Scripture. 

Paul said we are to live by FAITH and not SIGHT [or perception]. What is "substance and evidence" but things that can be seen, weighed and perceived? And things that can be SEEN AND HANDLED (as
in "substance") don't require faith in the first place. Faith is was is required when there IS NOT SUBSTANCE OR EVIDENCE! An infidel can believe in things he can see and handle!  Faith is the "assumption" or "confidence" or "assurance" ASIDE from any substance or evidence!

Possibly the Greek "[h]upo'stasis" can be used to mean substance, however, not in any Scripture that I am aware of.  And the same is true with Heb. 1:3. Jesus does not "consist" of the "substance" of God Who is invisible, but rather Jesus is the VISIBLE IMAGE of the INVISIBLE GOD. God does not bear this visible substance which can be seen, therefore He send His Son in a VISIBLE form that can be seen (and heard). 

This same Greek word is found in other Scriptures, but it is NEVER translated "substance." Notice for example, II Cor. 9:4, and 11:17, Heb. 3:14. If the Father were to take to Himself a Form or a Substance then what we would see is CHRIST. Christ IS the express image, form, (or substance if you insist) of God His Father. However, the difference is that when Christ takes on all of the Father's form, image, character, etc., etc., we can see and hear and touch Him with our hands, but we still cannot see, hear or touch our Heavenly Father with our physical hands. Jesus said that when we SEE Him we SEE the Father even though the Father is INVISIBLE! Granted, this is a little higher than theology 101.

You state, "Man, don't you believe the Bible? Colosians 1:15-16 refers to Christ as the 'firstborn' (PROTOTOKOS)=originator/source of ALL God's creation." Do you really think I never read that Scripture or don't believe it?

But notice how you answer this question in your own statement:  "Christ...the source of all GOD's creation."  There it is "God's" creation. There is always that ONE before and above Christ--God, His Father and His God!  It took REAL POWER to create the universe didn't it?   Where do you suppose Christ got that power? Man, don't you believe the Bible? (Just kidding).

Now seriously, Mat. 2818, "ALL POWER is GIVEN unto me in heaven and in earth."  There it is again, my friend. The FATHER is always in charge. And again, I Cor. 15:27-28,

"For He [the Father] hath put all things under His [Christ's] feet. But when He [the Father] saith, all things are put under Him [Christ] it is MANIFEST THAT HE [GOD THE FATHER] IS EXCEPTED, which did put all things under Him." 

And not verse 28:

"And when all things shall be subdued unto Him [Christ], then shall the Son ALSO HIMSELF BE SUBJECT unto HIM [HIS GOD AND FATHER] that PUT all things under Him, that God may be all in all."

No trinity here, my friend. In fact the Holy Spirit is not even mentioned in these most bold declaration of God through Paul.

Rather than say "Christ is not the supreme deity" let me restate it so that you can hopefully and clearly see the concept that I am presenting. Paul tells us that God is a "family" in Ephesians. Jesus Christ is not the HEAD of that family of God, but rather the FATHER is the head and just as I quoted to you from the Scriptures in I Cor. 15, Jesus Christ will always be SUBJECT TO THE FATHER and no the other way around. Cannot you agree with that statement in Verse 28, "...then shall the SON also Himself be SUBJECT unto HIM [THE FATHER]...?  And let me just say that that word for subject in this verse is the same word used in Luke 10:20, "Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits ARE SUBJECT unto you..." Since the spirits are "subject" to the apostles, how could we ever contend that they are EQUAL as in a "trinity?"

As far as Christ going around claiming He was God, He did not, however, I will concede that He did say before Abraham was "I AM."  Even when Pilate asked directly whether or not He was the Son of God, Christ refused to answer Pilate directly. If you noticed I made the statement at least twice in my paper, "Jesus IS GOD" "Christ is God."

Gotta run. Till next time. . .
Ray
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat




#############

Hi! Kath

Your quote to Anthony "Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;" (KJV). A glance at the superior against the word beginning says the first born, and I realize that that can be taken two ways, so let us take it further.

I know that the Word/Christ got His power and everything He possesses from His Father. All biological children have character traits from the parents but not the splitting image of the parents because there are two individuals involved. But in the case of the Father the Son is the snapshot image of Him because there is only One involved, which means that the snapshot image Son in His Father's bosom has all the character traits of the Father including the title of God but subject to Him, lower in rank. When the Father gives birth or begats the Son. The Son is God the Creator, the beginning of creation. Here we have the beginning of creation and it's what the superior against the word beginning in (Rev.3:14) means. The Creator/God is the First Fruit of the beginning not a created being.

If you must insist how do you address this verse? “But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity.” (Micah 5:2).  How can a created being have existed eternally?   

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     


Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 16, 2008, 06:38:34 PM

Hi Roy,

I follow you right up to this statement, "When the Father gives birth or begats the Son. The Son is God the Creator, the beginning of creation. Here we have the beginning of creation and it's what the superior against the word beginning in (Rev.3:14) means. The Creator/God is the First Fruit of the beginning not a created being."

So the Son - Jesus Christ - Creator of the universe did come out of the Father, but are you saying that the Father did not create Him? 
As for the verse in Micah 5,

Mic 5:2  "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
       Though you are little among the thousands of Judah,
       Yet out of you shall come forth to Me
       The One to be Ruler in Israel,
       Whose goings forth are from of old,
       From everlasting."

There are other verses that speak the the coming Messiah as if it were the Father speaking.

Deu 18:18  I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him.
v. 19  And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him.

1Sa 2:35  Then I will raise up for Myself a faithful priest who shall do according to what is in My heart and in My mind. I will build him a sure house, and he shall walk before My anointed forever.

The God we always heard from in the OT was Jehovah, who became Jesus of the NT, He is the spokesman of the Father as no one has ever heard the Father's voice.

John 5:37  And the Father Himself, who sent Me, has testified of Me. You have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His form.

John 12:49  For I have not spoken on My own authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and what I should speak.

I believe Jesus Christ always spoke what the Father commanded in the OT as Jehovah and in the NT as Jesus Christ, as in says in Mal 3:6  "For I am the LORD, I do not change;"

We have a Scripture in the NT that appear as the Father spoke too.

Mat 17:5  While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them; and suddenly a voice came out of the cloud, saying, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!"

We know that this was not the Father speaking either.  Here is an email on this.

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,5374.0.html ---

Dear Mark:
Notice that it was "a" voice, not the Father's voice. God has many millions of messengers (erroneously called "angels" in Scripture). A messenger delivers messages. These particular message was that "This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased, hear ye Him."  The messenger ("a voice") delivered the message.  Simple, huh?
God be with you,
Ray
-------------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 16, 2008, 06:43:16 PM

If you must insist how do you address this verse?
“But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity.” (Micah 5:2).  How can a created being have existed eternally?   


"If you must insist how do you address this verse?"

Bad translation.

Hi Roy,

Here it is in Rotherham's;

Micah 5:2 Thou therefore Bethlehem Ephrathah, though little to be among the thousands of Judah, Out of thee shall Mine come forth, to be ruler in Israel, Whose coming forth have been from of old, from the days of age-past time.

Kat provided some compelling evidence from Ray's "Trinity" paper as well as email but the following article should also be of some help.

http://bible-truths.com/aeonion.htm

His Peace to you,

Joe  
 


 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 16, 2008, 11:32:17 PM
Hi Roy,
I will try to honor your request, but before i go any further i need to ask you some questions.

Quote
This proves that Jesus the man was created but Jesus the Word whom we worship and follow was Born of God and as such is God in His own right and not part of the creation, rather the CREATOR.

and on his thigh is written The Word of God.  Was the Word born at the same time Jesus was
created?  We all know Jesus is the world,

Joh 1:14  AndG2532 theG3588 WordG3056 was madeG1096 flesh,G4561 andG2532 dweltG4637 amongG1722 us,G2254 (andG2532 we beheldG2300 hisG846 glory,G1391 the gloryG1391 asG5613 of the only begottenG3439 ofG3844 the Father,)G3962 fullG4134 of graceG5485 andG2532 truth.G225
The same G3056 is in Jn 1.

logos
log'-os
From G3004; something said (including the thought); by implication a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension a computation; specifically (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ): - account, cause, communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say (-ing), shew, X speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.


So are you saying when God came up with the Thought (the Word)--G3056, this Thought was not created but rather born, by inclination of coming in to the mind of The Father. Then this Thought (Word) started creating and that that thought was not created?
So are you basically saying the Father instantly begot the Thought (the Word) and didnt have to question his thought and then started creating?----whoa i see your point with this question.

I walked away for a while and thought on this more.  I see what your are basically saying Roy. 

Basically its like this.  Can God come up with a thought without a cause.  Of course, He's God.  The Father does have free will right?  And If this was the case then yes, the Word could be seperate from the creation.  Think about it.  God the Father had no reason/cause to do anything, but in a instant He came up with the Thought and then this Thought starts following through on what came to God's mind.

On the other hand, Did the Father have a reason/cause to want to create anything?  In one of Ray's emails on the BT site he states that God is lonely (no scripture comes to mind of why God came up with this Thought/Word).  If this is the case or if any other thing caused God to even come up with the Thought then this Thought/Word was created.  Think about it.

Im trying not to think about it in a human way and of course our thoughts are not His thoughts.

So the question is why God created anything and even why this Thought came to His my mind?

Roy, as you are, i am also.  I want to know the full truth.  I believe if we know why the Word was even born/begotten/ or created we will have what we are looking for.

In Jesus,

Anthony

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: OBrenda on August 17, 2008, 11:23:57 AM
Forgive my simple mind. This is very interesting and possibly to deep for me, but I can't see the question clearly  ???

Is it what is the difference between, created & begotton?

We all have come into this world through natural conception.? (except Jesus)
Haven't we all been predestined by God for his purpose prior to our natural birth?

...

If I have a thought/idea....I want to paint a picture.
Doesn't that creation flow through that thought/idea?

I'm a little lost here, can someone throw me a fish net, and reel me in?

Brenda

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 17, 2008, 12:00:45 PM

If you must insist how do you address this verse?
“But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity.” (Micah 5:2).  How can a created being have existed eternally?   


"If you must insist how do you address this verse?"

Bad translation.

Hi Roy,

Here it is in Rotherham's;

Micah 5:2 Thou therefore Bethlehem Ephrathah, though little to be among the thousands of Judah, Out of thee shall Mine come forth, to be ruler in Israel, Whose coming forth have been from of old, from the days of age-past time.

Kat provided some compelling evidence from Ray's "Trinity" paper as well as email but the following article should also be of some help.

http://bible-truths.com/aeonion.htm

His Peace to you,

Joe  
 


 

#########

Hi! Joe

I don't have a Rotherham's Bible but I do have a KJV, NASV, Interlinear and a concordance and they all render it as eternity, and I can't see any difference in the age-past time translation. This means an age with no time barrier or timeless, eternal.

After being alerted to it by Samson I have now read Ray's paper on the Trinity and it is as you say overwhelming evidence against the Trinity farce which I never believed in in the first place and that is the reason why I didn't bother to read it earlier. But Ray does not show a great deal of evidence on the creation of Christ.

So it hasn't helped I'm sorry to say, but I appreciate your input.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
   
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 17, 2008, 01:43:37 PM

If you must insist how do you address this verse?
“But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity.” (Micah 5:2).  How can a created being have existed eternally?   


"If you must insist how do you address this verse?"

Bad translation.

Hi Roy,

Here it is in Rotherham's;

Micah 5:2 Thou therefore Bethlehem Ephrathah, though little to be among the thousands of Judah, Out of thee shall Mine come forth, to be ruler in Israel, Whose coming forth have been from of old, from the days of age-past time.

Kat provided some compelling evidence from Ray's "Trinity" paper as well as email but the following article should also be of some help.

http://bible-truths.com/aeonion.htm

His Peace to you,

Joe  
 


 

#########

Hi! Joe

I don't have a Rotherham's Bible but I do have a KJV, NASV, Interlinear and a concordance and they all render it as eternity, and I can't see any difference in the age-past time translation. This means an age with no time barrier or timeless, eternal.

After being alerted to it by Samson I have now read Ray's paper on the Trinity and it is as you say overwhelming evidence against the Trinity farce which I never believed in in the first place and that is the reason why I didn't bother to read it earlier. But Ray does not show a great deal of evidence on the creation of Christ.

So it hasn't helped I'm sorry to say, but I appreciate your input.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
   

Hi Roy,

Did you check out the link I attached in my last post?  http://bible-truths.com/aeonion.htm

Here is a portion of it;

ETERNAL DURATION AND MODERN CONCEPTIONS

It does not seem to have been generally considered by students of this subject that the thought of endless duration is comparatively a modern conception. The ancients, at a time more recent than the dates of the Old Testament, had not yet cognized the idea of endless duration, so that passages containing the word applied to God do not mean that he is of eternal duration, but the idea was of indefinite and not unlimited duration. I introduce here a passage from Professor Knapp, or Knappius, the author of the best edition of the Greek Testament known, and one in use in many colleges and ranks as a scholar of rare erudition. He observes:


"The pure idea of eternity is too abstract to have been conceived in the early ages of the world, and accordingly is not found expressed by any word in the ancient languages. But as cultivation advanced and this idea became more distinctly developed, it became necessary in order to express it to invent new words in a new sense, as was done with the words eternitas,perennitas, etc. The Hebrews were destitute of any single word to express endless duration. To express a past eternity they said before the world was; a future, when the world shall be no more. . . . The Hebrews and other ancient people have no one word for expressing the precise idea of eternity."

Here are a few other translations of this verse;

Micah 5:2 (New International Version)

"But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
       though you are small among the clans of Judah,
       out of you will come for me
       one who will be ruler over Israel,
       whose origins are from of old,
       from ancient times."

Micah 5:2 (New Living Translation)

 But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah,
      are only a small village among all the people of Judah.
   Yet a ruler of Israel will come from you,
      one whose origins are from the distant past.

Micah 5:2 (English Standard Version)
 
 But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah,
   who are too little to be among the clans of Judah,
from you shall come forth for me
   one who is to be ruler in Israel,
whose coming forth is from of old,
   from ancient days.


Micah 5:2 (Contemporary English Version)
 
Bethlehem Ephrath,

   you are one of the smallest towns

   in the nation of Judah.

   But the LORD will choose

   one of your people

   to rule the nation--

   someone whose family

   goes back to ancient times. 


Micah 5:2 (Young's Literal Translation)

 And thou, Beth-Lehem Ephratah, Little to be among the chiefs of Judah! From thee to Me he cometh forth -- to be ruler in Israel, And his comings forth [are] of old, From the days of antiquity.


Micah 5:2 (New International Version - UK)

 2But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.

Micah 5:2 (Today's New International Version)
   
[a] 2 "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
       though you are small among the clans of Judah,
       out of you will come for me
       one who will be ruler over Israel,
       whose origins are from of old,
       from ancient times."

Hope this is some help to you Brother.

Peace,

Joe
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 17, 2008, 02:04:07 PM
Forgive my simple mind. This is very interesting and possibly to deep for me, but I can't see the question clearly  ???

Is it what is the difference between, created & begotton?

We all have come into this world through natural conception.? (except Jesus)
Haven't we all been predestined by God for his purpose prior to our natural birth?

...

If I have a thought/idea....I want to paint a picture.
Doesn't that creation flow through that thought/idea?

I'm a little lost here, can someone throw me a fish net, and reel me in?

Brenda




########

Hi! Brenda

This is what I'm about, the difference between Begotten and Created. There is a gulf as wide as East to West between them.

Let us first consider the physical world.

To be born it requires two individuals to be involved, the result boy/girl has the character traits of both father and mother, they are not mirror images of either one. They are separate individuals.

Now let us consider the spiritual.

The Father is Spirit and we are told that "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him."  (Jn.1:18) Only the Son who is in the bosom of the Father has seen Him. We are also told that; "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God." (Jn.1:1-2) that the Word/Son/Christ was in the beginning, and that the Word was with God the Father, and that the Word was God.

This can only mean that the Son was in the bosom of the Father from the very beginning. In which case the Son has the identical character traits bestowed on Him by the Father as the Father is ONE GOD. “I and the Father are one.”   (Jn.10:30). "Worthy art thou, our Lord and our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power: for thou didst create all things, and because of thy will they were, and were created."  (Rev.4:11). In short a snapshot image of the Father but junior to or less than the Father by virtue of being His Son. "You heard that I said to you, ‘I go away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved Me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." (Jn.14:28).

What the Word of God is saying to me is that when the Father decided to start His work of Creation He brought forth, gave birth to His Only Begotten Son, who is a legitimate Son/God/Christ, and not a created God/Christ, who is then commissioned by the Father to create all things that are of or in the Father. Jesus Christ is the Creator/God and the beginning of all creation.

If we worship the created Christ we are worshiping the creation not the CREATOR. That's what I believe and that is what the Word of God is saying to me following Ray's teaching, Scripture witness Scripture, spiritual witness spiritual.

I hope this answers your question?

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     


Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 17, 2008, 02:10:53 PM

I can't see any difference in the age-past time translation. This means an age with no time barrier or timeless, eternal.


 ???

Roy,

How do you come to this conclusion? Because an event happened in an age in past time that means it is eternal or always was that way? This age past somehow denotes that is always was that way and had no beginning? That seems to be a huge stretch my friend.

A few examples;

During my grandfather's age in the late 1800's and early 1900's he farmed an area that in the past was all agricultural, that same area has now been a residential neighborhood for well over 80 years.

Before the age of the Roman Empire Alexander the Great made Greece one of the most dominant nation/empires of civilisations past.

In ages past most people did not travel more than 20 miles of where they were born.

Can you see no beginning in the above examples? Did all of these things exist eternally before they changed?

Peace,

Joe
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 17, 2008, 03:42:31 PM
hi all,
Quote
If I have a thought/idea....I want to paint a picture.
Doesn't that creation flow through that thought/idea?

That's what im saying.  We would have a cause to paint that picture.  But did God have a cause to want to create or did it just come out of nowhere and then boom (pardon my expression please).

That is what i think Roy is saying the difference in begotten and created.  And looking at what strong's has put for the Logos, i can see what Roy is saying.  Has anyone found a scripture where it mentions why God wanted to create?  Why he even came up with the thought, or desire to?

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Dave in Tenn on August 17, 2008, 04:34:29 PM
Roy, my overall impression of the paper was that Ray did what Trinity theorists don't do...that is he stuck with what scripture we have and didn't venture 'extra-biblically' to explain it.  Now..how can he, or you, or I 'explain' God?  We can find statements in scripture that describe certain characteristics of God, and teach/believe them as Truth.  But even the scriptures don't explain or define 'Spirit', tell us exactly HOW God created the Heavens and the Earth, what existed before it's creation, what the interaction and relationship of Spirit to the Physical is all about, how God will raise the dead, none of the characteristics of God.  When it comes to God, the scriptures themselves are parables.  Does the Father have hands, a face, a backside?  What is Spirit?  What is Love, even? 

So we have scripture that says the Son is both created and begotten.  Makes me feel a little like Peter after Jesus 'explained' a parable.  "Yes, Lord, I understand now."  Oh really?  I'm very sure that the Scriptures go deeper than I know now, but I'm convinced beyond being unconvinced that we cannot know now what those words really MEAN when it comes to God.  To Rays' credit, I think, he doesn't go where Angels fear to tread.  All language 'falls short of the Glory of God'.  All we have are symbols, because in the end, that's what words themselves are.

   
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 17, 2008, 04:52:51 PM

Hi Roy,

I follow you right up to this statement, "When the Father gives birth or begats the Son. The Son is God the Creator, the beginning of creation. Here we have the beginning of creation and it's what the superior against the word beginning in (Rev.3:14) means. The Creator/God is the First Fruit of the beginning not a created being."

So the Son - Jesus Christ - Creator of the universe did come out of the Father, but are you saying that the Father did not create Him? 
As for the verse in Micah 5,

Mic 5:2  "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
       Though you are little among the thousands of Judah,
       Yet out of you shall come forth to Me
       The One to be Ruler in Israel,
       Whose goings forth are from of old,
       From everlasting."

There are other verses that speak the the coming Messiah as if it were the Father speaking.

Deu 18:18  I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him.
v. 19  And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him.

1Sa 2:35  Then I will raise up for Myself a faithful priest who shall do according to what is in My heart and in My mind. I will build him a sure house, and he shall walk before My anointed forever.

The God we always heard from in the OT was Jehovah, who became Jesus of the NT, He is the spokesman of the Father as no one has ever heard the Father's voice.

John 5:37  And the Father Himself, who sent Me, has testified of Me. You have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His form.

John 12:49  For I have not spoken on My own authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and what I should speak.

I believe Jesus Christ always spoke what the Father commanded in the OT as Jehovah and in the NT as Jesus Christ, as in says in Mal 3:6  "For I am the LORD, I do not change;"

We have a Scripture in the NT that appear as the Father spoke too.

Mat 17:5  While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them; and suddenly a voice came out of the cloud, saying, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!"

We know that this was not the Father speaking either.  Here is an email on this.

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,5374.0.html ---

Dear Mark:
Notice that it was "a" voice, not the Father's voice. God has many millions of messengers (erroneously called "angels" in Scripture). A messenger delivers messages. These particular message was that "This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased, hear ye Him."  The messenger ("a voice") delivered the message.  Simple, huh?
God be with you,
Ray
-------------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat




Hi! Kath

What I'm saying is that Jesus Christ was in the bosom of the Father, like the fetus of a human child in the mother, right from the beginning. But unlike the fetus in the human mother which carries the character traits of both the mother and father. In the case of Christ in the Father, the Fetus/Son is the snapshot mirror image or identical image of the Father carrying all the same character traits as the Father, “I and the Father are one.”    (Jn.10:30) including His power and authority but subject to the Father as He Himself admits; “You heard that I said to you, ‘I go away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved Me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." (Jn.14:28).

Now when the Father decided to start creation, He gave birth to (brought forth, begotten) His Son/Christ, Son of God, God and commissioned Him with full power and authority to be the CREATOR/GOD in the beginning to do His Father's creation work. This Creator/God is the Word that was impregnated into Mary by the Holy Spirit of the Father and became flesh/ Jesus Christ, Son of God. "For to which of the angels did He ever say, “You are My Son, Today I have begotten You”? And again, “I will be a Father to Him And He shall be a Son to Me”?  (Heb.1:5).

Only the legitimate Son/Christ born of Father and commissioned by Him to create, THE CREATOR, is worthy of worship but to worship a created/Christ is to worship the creation and not the Creator.

So to answer your question, yes, I am saying that Jesus Christ is the legitimately Begotten/Born Son of God and not a created being. I'm only deducing this by using Ray's very own teaching; Scripture verify Scripture and spiritual verify spiritual and can't see that I'm doing anything wrong. I had no idea that there could be any other interpretation to Jesus Christ other than the one I've given here. I admire and applaud all Ray's teachings and am deeply indebted to him for enlightening me on the True Gospel of Jesus Christ, salvation for all mankind and the absurdity of the notion of a free will, plus all his teachings which are truly inspired and will take me my lifetime to understand and absorb. God bless him and I pray to God for his healing.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 17, 2008, 05:16:56 PM

Hi Roy,

Here is the Scripture about we should not worship the creation.

Rom 1:25  who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

But in this verse that says we should not worship the creation, we have an exception to what was just spoken before "rather than the Creator."  So if this is talking about Christ He would be excluded by that statement "rather than the Creator."

We know He existed before He was begotten in Mary.  But was He created or eternally with the Father?  I'm not sure we understand about that yet, but here is an excerpt from WHO AND WHAT IS JESUS? & WHO IS HIS FATHER? from the Nashville Conference 2007.  This will give you a little more to think about  :)

http://forums.bible-truths.com/index.php/topic,4472.0.html -----

1Tim 6:13  I charge thee in the sight of God(so who is the subject here - God), who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed the good confession;
v. 14  that thou keep the commandment, without spot, without reproach, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:
v. 5  which in its own times He shall show, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;

Well you say that’s got to be talking about Jesus Christ.  Well maybe not.  I mean God is everything that Jesus Christ is too, you know.  Who is the Savior of the world?  Jesus Christ.  God is the Savior of the world!  Yes Jesus Christ is the channel through who it comes.  But God almighty is the Savior of the world.  He’s also the Creator.  We are actually going to find out, who actually did the creating?  Christ.  But who is the Creator?  God the Father.  But we are going to see it specifically, in detail.  
So then it says;

1Tim 6:15  “which in its own times He shall show, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;
v. 16  who only hath immortality…”
I always thought that was speaking about Christ.  But I’m thinking now, no, He’s talking about God.  God only has immortality;
v. 16 “… dwelling in light unapproachable; whom no man hath seen, nor can see…”
Isn’t this talking about God, the Father?  Well what does it matter?  
Well here’s the thing.  Where does it say if somebody is able to have the title God, that you have to be eternal for that?  I don’t know of any.  

There is no doubt about it Jesus Christ now has immortality, that means He can’t die.  But we are talking about a time when God ‘only’ had immortality.  And where did Christ say He got His life?  He got it from the Father (John 5:26).  
v
v
It says when Jesus was raised, He was raised a living Spirit (1Cor 15: 45).  Was He a living Spirit before that?  I don’t know.  I tried to find a scripture in the OT (the OT is big), that said ‘God is spirit,’ and I couldn’t find one, you know about the OT God.  In the NT Jesus Christ said of His Father.
 John 4: 21 “…the hour cometh, when neither in this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, shall ye worship the Father.”
v. 22  “Ye worship that which ye know not: we worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews.”
v. 23  “But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth…”

God is spirit.  We have a statement like that in the NT.  We don’t have one like that in the OT, at lease I can’t find one.
---------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: OBrenda on August 17, 2008, 05:32:44 PM
Thanks Kat....

That was really helpful to me!

Brenda
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 18, 2008, 09:32:20 AM
Quote
That is what i think Roy is saying the difference in begotten and created.  And looking at what strong's has put for the Logos, i can see what Roy is saying.  Has anyone found a scripture where it mentions why God wanted to create?  Why he even came up with the thought, or desire to?

I think i found part of the answer.  This verse could possible be it, although alot of translations have pleasure translated Will.

Revelation 4   
4:11
Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created. 

I dont think this verse i directly referring to God the Father though.

In Jesus,

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 20, 2008, 12:33:35 PM
Hi! Kathy

Your quote; "But in this verse that says we should not worship the creation, we have an exception to what was just spoken before "rather than the Creator."  So if this is talking about Christ He would be excluded by that statement "rather than the Creator." We know He existed before He was begotten in Mary.  But was He created or eternally with the Father? "

Ages before Jesus was Begotten of Mary we are told that a body was prepared for Him in readiness in accord to the Father's predestined will. "Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure. “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come (In the scroll of the book it is written of Me) To do Your will, O God.’ (Heb.10:5-7). The Word has volunteered to do the Father's will.

Now we have this verse; "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being." (Jn.1:1-3). This tells us that the Word was from the very beginning with God, and it also tells us that the Word was God and that all things came into being through Him the Word/God.

Now this may appear to indicate that we are talking about two Gods whereas we know that there is only the ONE GOD and Father. But this Scripture explains this; "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him." (Jn.1:18). So the Word is in the bosom of the Father, like a fetus in a woman's womb. Still only ONE GOD. This Word in the bosom of the Father is the identical snapshot image of the Father with all His character traits. Unlike the human where two totally different individuals being involved, the child would have the character traits of both parents and would be unique in genetic make up. In the case of the Father there are no two beings involved just the Father. 

In the Father/Son relationship they have identical character traits but the Son/Word by virtue of being the Son is subject to the will of the Father out of Whom all power and energy, including the Word/Son comes forth. That is Begotten/Born but not created. The Word/Son is the legitimate Creator God, Son of the Father God.  "Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him."  (1Jn.5:1). Not created by Him but Born of Him.

When Mary conceives there is no human involvement, "Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: when His mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit."  (Matt.1:18). The Holy Spirit of the Father implanted the Word in the body of Jesus, that had been prepared for Him, into Mary. The result was Jesus Christ the legitimate Word/Son of God. The CREATOR of all things and not a created being. To worship a created being is to worship part of the creation and not the true Creator.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ.  I hope this helps.

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 20, 2008, 02:11:47 PM
HI Roy

Very nicely explained.  So i have another question.  When i was in with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong he wrote a paper that basically said that we shouldnt pray to Jesus but we are supposed to pray to the Father through Jesus.  So is this basically what you (scriptures you quoted) are saying too?

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 20, 2008, 02:15:17 PM
Hello Roy,

Are you saying through this thread that Jesus existed eternally 'in the bosom' of the Father? You don't believe begotten and created are the same?

And also, are you saying if we refer to Jesus as the Father's creation, that we cannot/should not worship the creation as we should only worship the Creator?

Looking through these posts and the scriptures everyone has posted, I still don't see the huge difference between begotten & created. Either way, the Father brought the Son, Jesus, into existence. Jesus stated He 'came out of the Father'. The Father comes out of no one. Jesus was able to die, the Father has always been immortal. Etc...

Also you stated that from John 1:1-5 this scripture means "This can only mean that the Son was in the bosom of the Father from the very beginning. In which case the Son has the identical character traits bestowed on Him by the Father as the Father is ONE GOD."

But see as you stated, the Son was at the very beginning...but the Father has no beginning. Whether begotton or created, Jesus came out of the Father and then brought everything else into existence. So Jesus had a beginning and the Father does not have a beginning.

In a nutshell, I still don't completely understand the issue. Whether begotton or created, Jesus came out of the Father and has a beginning. I don't understand how being either created or begotten changes anything about Christ.

For me, I wouldn't have a problem if people referred to Jesus as begotton only or created only. It doesn't seem edifying to refer to Him as only one or the other. Kind of a non-issue to me but to each his own.


Thanks,

Marques
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 20, 2008, 08:08:27 PM
Quote
Very nicely explained.  So i have another question.  When i was in with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong he wrote a paper that basically said that we shouldnt pray to Jesus but we are supposed to pray to the Father through Jesus.  So is this basically what you (scriptures you quoted) are saying too?

I've been searching the scriptures and i cant find one where it says praise Jesus (as part of the creation).

Mt 11:25 - Show Context
At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.

Mt 21:16 - Show Context
"Do you hear what these children are saying?" they asked him. "Yes," replied Jesus, "have you never read, "'From the lips of children and infants you have ordained praise'?"

Lu 10:21 - Show Context
At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure.

2Co 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father OF our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of compassion and the God of all comfort,

Eph 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ.

Php 1:11 - Show Context
filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ--to the glory and praise of God.

Heb 13:15 - Show Context
Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise--the fruit of lips that confess his name.

1Pe 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 


These I'm not sure on.  They could be referring to the Father...

1Ch 16:25 - Show Context
For great is the Lord and most worthy of praise; he is to be feared above all gods.

Ps 96:4 - Show Context
For great is the Lord and most worthy of praise; he is to be feared above all gods.

Some translations translate Lord, Jehovah very few has the "he" capitalized (i dont know why).

Roy i see the difference you (scriptures) are saying.

John 1:11-14
11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

We will also be born of God.  We are created now, but we will all be born again.

Joh 3:3 - Show Context
In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

Joh 3:7 - Show Context
You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'

1Pe 1:23 - Show Context
For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God

Strong's Number:   1080 
Original Word Word Origin
gennavw from a variation of (1085)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Gennao 1:665,114
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ghen-nah'-o      Verb 
 
 Definition
of men who fathered children
to be born
to be begotten
of women giving birth to children
metaph.
to engender, cause to arise, excite
in a Jewish sense, of one who brings others over to his way of life, to convert someone
of God making Christ his son
of God making men his sons through faith in Christ's work
 

Born/begotten or created.  Is it just semantics?  Im beginning to see that it aint.

May God open all our eyes to what he is saying in His Word in Jesus name,

Anthony

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Dave in Tenn on August 20, 2008, 08:19:15 PM
As Ray has pointed out, it is axiomatic that for God to be Father, He must have (in this case) a Son.  

I agree with Marques that the words 'created', 'begotten', 'come out of' present no problem to me any more than 'justification', 'propitiation', 'redemption' present no problem--they are specific aspects (in the context of explaining) of the same thing.

The most telling verse in my understanding is in Hebrews.

Heb 1:1  God, having spoken in former times in fragmentary and varied fashion to our forefathers by the prophets,
Heb 1:2  has in these last days spoken to us by a Son whom he appointed to be the heir of everything and through whom he also made the universe.
Heb 1:3  He is the reflection of God's glory and the exact likeness of his being, and he holds everything together by his powerful word. After he had provided a cleansing from sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Highest Majesty
Heb 1:4  and became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is better than theirs.

Though the KJV and its followers translates the Greek as 'angels' rather than 'messengers', it seems very clear to me that the writer of Hebrews is speaking about the Prophets of old as 'messengers' because that's how he starts his thought.

Heb. 1:3 is the key, for me.  The writer makes three statements (underlined) concerning Christ before his sacrifice.  The third statement helps my understanding the most, because I cannot fathom the full meaning of the others.  "He holds everything together by his powerful word."  He is clearly Christ, the Creator.

It helps because it points out more clearly the WAY in which God interacts with the physical universe.  Surely He created it, but to 'sustain it' or 'hold it together' implies a continued 'interface' between God Who is Spirit and the physical, of which we are a part.  Clearly, it is Christ the Son who is the Creator, the Sustainer, and the 'holder together'.  He is the God who 'comes out of' the Father and HE and the Father are One.  For me, Christ is the interface of Spirit God with physical creation.

It's my personal belief that physical creation itself has much more of a connection with Spirit and much less a 'distinction from' than common understanding.  Heb. 1:3 gives evidence of this.  I am hoping that Ray's conference in Nashville and the materials that come out of that will either correct or strengthen my understanding.

I still maintain that words are not enough to fully comprehend God.  But they are what we have, and we would have precious little understanding without them.  His words are Truth.  We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'.  



Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 09:31:59 AM
As Ray has pointed out, it is axiomatic that for God to be Father, He must have (in this case) a Son. 

I agree with Marques that the words 'created', 'begotten', 'come out of' present no problem to me any more than 'justification', 'propitiation', 'redemption' present no problem--they are specific aspects (in the context of explaining) of the same thing.

The most telling verse in my understanding is in Hebrews.

Heb 1:1  God, having spoken in former times in fragmentary and varied fashion to our forefathers by the prophets,
Heb 1:2  has in these last days spoken to us by a Son whom he appointed to be the heir of everything and through whom he also made the universe.
Heb 1:3  He is the reflection of God's glory and the exact likeness of his being, and he holds everything together by his powerful word. After he had provided a cleansing from sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Highest Majesty
Heb 1:4  and became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is better than theirs.

Though the KJV and its followers translates the Greek as 'angels' rather than 'messengers', it seems very clear to me that the writer of Hebrews is speaking about the Prophets of old as 'messengers' because that's how he starts his thought.

Heb. 1:3 is the key, for me.  The writer makes three statements (underlined) concerning Christ before his sacrifice.  The third statement helps my understanding the most, because I cannot fathom the full meaning of the others.  "He holds everything together by his powerful word."  He is clearly Christ, the Creator.

It helps because it points out more clearly the WAY in which God interacts with the physical universe.  Surely He created it, but to 'sustain it' or 'hold it together' implies a continued 'interface' between God Who is Spirit and the physical, of which we are a part.  Clearly, it is Christ the Son who is the Creator, the Sustainer, and the 'holder together'.  He is the God who 'comes out of' the Father and HE and the Father are One.  For me, Christ is the interface of Spirit God with physical creation.

It's my personal belief that physical creation itself has much more of a connection with Spirit and much less a 'distinction from' than common understanding.  Heb. 1:3 gives evidence of this.  I am hoping that Ray's conference in Nashville and the materials that come out of that will either correct or strengthen my understanding.

I still maintain that words are not enough to fully comprehend God.  But they are what we have, and we would have precious little understanding without them.  His words are Truth.  We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'. 






Hi! Brother Dave in Tenn

I agree with what you are saying;  "He holds everything together by his powerful word."  
That is very understandable because we are told that He is the Word; "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being."  (1Jn.1:1-3). This is exactly what Paul is telling us in Heb.1:1-3.

There is only ONE God the Father, so how do we come to have two Gods, the Father God and the Son God?

A little lower down this mystery is revealed; "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him."  (Jn.1:18). The Word/Son is in the bosom of the Father, a Fetus if you will, this being so it is still ONE God, the Father.

So where does the Word get His power from?

In human relations the child is the product of two individuals and as a consequence carries the genes of both parents. He/she is a totally independent being with a DNA of its very own, unique.

Now in the case of the Father Son relationship there is only one parent the Father, so the Son of necessity carries all the character traits of the Father. In short He is an identical snapshot image of the Father, which is what Paul is telling us in; "And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made."  (Heb.1:3).

At the consummation we all hope to be sons and daughters of the Living God. But there will still only be the ONE GOD the FATHER in Whom are all things.

This how I see it, brother, but I don't quite understand your statement; "We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'."   Maybe you'd like to enlighten me?

The only point I disagree with both you and Marques is on the meaning of the two words, Begotten and Created.
There is not much difference I agree in carnal, earthly terms but when we come to apply those words to God they become as different as apples and potatoes.

Let me explain my reasoning;

Begotten means, bringing forth, being born, giving birth to. All living creatures, including man, can produce and give birth to, but they cannot create. That is God's sole prerogative.
   
Created means, to make, to produce, to manufacture out of pure energy, which is Light which is the Father. Only God has the power to create.

Now let us take the word Begotten. If the Father gives birth/begets the Word/Christ, Christ will be the exact image of the Father with His power to do His Will, that is, to create all things. In short He is the Creator/God who rightly deserves our worship. " "Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him."  (1Jn.5:1).

Now let us take the word Create. If the Father created the Word/Christ, and the Word created all things, then the Word would be a part of that creation. In short the Word would be a mere creature and we would be worshiping the creature and not the Creator/God which is idolatry and no different to the Hindu worshiping a cow or a golden calf.

JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION AND SINCERE BELIEF, BROTHER

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

PS.   All emphasis are mine.
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 10:15:04 AM
Quote
Let me explain my reasoning;

Begotten means, bringing forth, being born, giving birth to. All living creatures, including man, can produce and give birth to, but they cannot create. That is God's sole prerogative.
   
Created means, to make, to produce, to manufacture out of pure energy, which is Light which is the Father. Only God has the power to create.

Now let us take the word Begotten. If the Father gives birth/begets the Word/Christ, Christ will be the exact image of the Father with His power to do His Will, that is, to create all things. In short He is the Creator/God who rightly deserves our worship. " "Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him."  (1Jn.5:1).

Now let us take the word Create. If the Father created the Word/Christ, and the Word created all things, then the Word would be a part of that creation. In short the Word would be a mere creature and we would be worshiping the creature and not the Creator/God which is idolatry and no different to the Hindu worshiping a cow or a golden calf.

Good post Roy. 

Quote
I still maintain that words are not enough to fully comprehend God.  But they are what we have, and we would have precious little understanding without them.  His words are Truth.  We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'. 


Dave, I agree its hard to fully comprehend God.  When Roy first started this thread I was saying what everyone hear is saying---created begotten is the same thing.  But I started searching through the bible (mainly the NT) to find anywhere where it says to worship Christ/Jesus.  Everything i found was basically saying "praise God the Father of Jesus"  or "for Jesus" or something of the like.  This made me really think on what Roy posted and that ther must be a difference between the words created and begotten.  Just look at what i had posted earlier.

If you or someone can find a verse that i may have overlooked please let me know. 

In Jesus

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 10:31:02 AM
Quote
Very nicely explained.  So i have another question.  When i was in with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong he wrote a paper that basically said that we shouldnt pray to Jesus but we are supposed to pray to the Father through Jesus.  So is this basically what you (scriptures you quoted) are saying too?

I've been searching the scriptures and i cant find one where it says praise Jesus (as part of the creation).

Mt 11:25 - Show Context
At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.

Mt 21:16 - Show Context
"Do you hear what these children are saying?" they asked him. "Yes," replied Jesus, "have you never read, "'From the lips of children and infants you have ordained praise'?"

Lu 10:21 - Show Context
At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this was your good pleasure.

2Co 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father OF our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of compassion and the God of all comfort,

Eph 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ.

Php 1:11 - Show Context
filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ--to the glory and praise of God.

Heb 13:15 - Show Context
Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise--the fruit of lips that confess his name.

1Pe 1:3 - Show Context
Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 


These I'm not sure on.  They could be referring to the Father...

1Ch 16:25 - Show Context
For great is the Lord and most worthy of praise; he is to be feared above all gods.

Ps 96:4 - Show Context
For great is the Lord and most worthy of praise; he is to be feared above all gods.

Some translations translate Lord, Jehovah very few has the "he" capitalized (i dont know why).

Roy i see the difference you (scriptures) are saying.

John 1:11-14
11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

We will also be born of God.  We are created now, but we will all be born again.

Joh 3:3 - Show Context
In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

Joh 3:7 - Show Context
You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'

1Pe 1:23 - Show Context
For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God

Strong's Number:   1080 
Original Word Word Origin
gennavw from a variation of (1085)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Gennao 1:665,114
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ghen-nah'-o      Verb 
 
 Definition
of men who fathered children
to be born
to be begotten
of women giving birth to children
metaph.
to engender, cause to arise, excite
in a Jewish sense, of one who brings others over to his way of life, to convert someone
of God making Christ his son
of God making men his sons through faith in Christ's work
 

Born/begotten or created.  Is it just semantics?  Im beginning to see that it aint.

May God open all our eyes to what he is saying in His Word in Jesus name,

Anthony




Hi! Anthony

Your quote brother; "'ve been searching the scriptures and i cant find one where it says praise Jesus (as part of the creation)."

Ever since Samson dropped that bomb shell "Thank God for creating Jesus Christ", I have desperately searched to the best of my intellectual and inspirational ability to find one bit of information to verify it but to no avail as it just doesn't exist.

I can only express my opinion on your question, but please understand I am not a teacher nor am I qualified to act as one. Having said that, I too was with Mr Armstrong for a short time till I realized that he was hopelessly under bondage and came out. But regarding your question I have to agree with him on this as we have a Scripture to prove it; "Therefore from now on we recognize no one according to the flesh; even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him in this way no longer. Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come."  (2Cor.5:16-17).

But Jesus has told us something that delights the soul and I use it a lot: “In that day you will not question Me about anything. Truly, truly, I say to you, if you ask the Father for anything in My name, He will give it to you. Until now you have asked for nothing in My name; ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be made full."  (Jn.16:23-24). This tells me that I must pray to the Father, not Him, but make my request in His name.

I believe we are Begotten of God now brother through Christ our Lord. Your answer is right there in your very own quote; "Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead."  (1Pet.1:3). 

These are not new teachings, Jesus said to Nicodemus; “Are you the teacher of Israel and do not understand these things? Truly, truly, I say to you, we speak of what we know and testify of what we have seen, and you do not accept our testimony. If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?"  (Jn.3:10-12).

I hope this helps.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     




Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 11:04:29 AM
Thanks Roy for help opening my eyes.  I believe we all are striving/hunger for all the Truth in all matters not just some of it and posts like this is God sheading the scales off our eyes to be able to see It.

When i first read that paper from HA i was very skeptical and pondered on it for awhile.  Then when you brought it up here i was like "what a better time than now to find if HA was on this and no better place than here in BTF."

Thanks again. 

God bless,

Anthony

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Heidi on August 22, 2008, 11:17:57 AM
Hi Roy and AK4,

I have been studying Ray's paper on The Father's will.....(THE FATHER'S WILL? . . . . . . . . . . . Mobile Conference 2006)

"Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

The beginning was the Word of God, what did God began with?  Jesus Christ, right?  The Word, that’s what God began with, Jesus Christ is the beginning.

In Gen. 1:1 it says, “In the beginning[ Heb: reshiyth - spec. Firstfruits] God [Heb: Elohim] created the heavens and the earth”
 
We read in 1 Cor 15:20  “But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the Firstfruit of those who slept.”

That Jesus Christ “became the Firstfruit of those who slept.”  Who is the Firstfurit?  JESUS CHRIST.

Where did Jesus come from:  John 7:29; John 13:3; John 9:42; John 16: 27-28; 1 John 4:9, 14.
 
Jesus was created by the Father; Heb 1:2; Rev 3:14.  Jesus Christ was created and than became the Creator of all.  So when you talk about Jesus Christ, you are talking about God.  But you are talking about the One who was begotten in the God family, and one who could be emptied and formed such as a man.

A couple of other points here.  Christ said to the Pharisees, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." (John 8:58).  He didn’t say I was, He said “I am.”  And what did He tell Moses?  Moses said who will I say sent me and He said tell,  “I AM THAT I AM” (Exo. 3:14), or I Am what I will be, is what the Hebrew indicates.
So Adam, Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Jacob and the Hebrews, never knew God the Father, they knew Jesus Christ - Yahweh.  When they hung Christ on the cross, they crucified their own Creator."

So Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament.  He is the reason Elohim is plural, “and God said let US.”
So the Father is doing the creating, but it is done through His Son, Jesus Christ, His first born.  Now for scriptural proof, in Heb. 1:8 it says "Thy throne, O God, is for the eon of the eons ...”  Now I know the Jehovah Witness and I’ve read all their stupid ways of trying to get around that verse, and it just won’t smoke.  It means what it says, God addresses Jesus Christ as “Thy throne, O God,” and the O is in there, it’s in the Greek and it’s back in the Hebrew where this verse is quoted from as well.

I hope this helps a bit.

Heidi
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 22, 2008, 11:34:29 AM

Now let us take the word Create. If the Father created the Word/Christ, and the Word created all things, then the Word would be a part of that creation. In short the Word would be a mere creature and we would be worshiping the creature and not the Creator/God which is idolatry and no different to the Hindu worshiping a cow or a golden calf.



Okay, so in a nutshell, this is what this entire thread was about right? You believe we should not refer to Christ as 'created' since you believe it would be idolatry. Instead, you believe that we should refer to Christ as 'begotten' only. Is that correct?

One thing though...either word you use, Christ did not exist until the Father either begotten him or created him. Or do you believe that he did exist always? I'm not trying to start an argument but to only get to the bottom of this subject.

One thing I thought of to back your point...in Hebrews 7, Paul (or whoever wrote it) stated that Levite in the loins of Abraham gave a tenth to Melchisedec. Kind of like how you stated begotten means. So in that way, Levite existed in Abraham so the same way Christ, being begotten, existed in the Father. Looking at it that way, I could see your point.

Am I on the right track?


Thanks,

Marques
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 11:44:49 AM
Quote
Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God

Hi heidi,

I gotta look further into that verse because some translations dont have...

"These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God"


New International Version    
 
Revelation 3     Read This Chapter
3:14
"To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:  
3:15
I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!  


The Complete Jewish Bible    
 
Revelation 3     Read This Chapter
3:14
"To the angel of the Messianic Community in Laodicea, write: 'Here is the message from the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the Ruler of God's creation:  
3:15
"I know what you are doing: you are neither cold nor hot. How I wish you were either one or the other!  


GOD'S WORD    
 
Revelation 3     Read This Chapter
3:14
"To the messenger of the church in Laodicea, write: The amen, the witness who is faithful and true, the source of God's creation, says:  
3:15
I know what you have done, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were cold or hot.  


Hebrew Names Version of World English Bible    
 
Revelation 3     Read This Chapter
3:14
"To the angel of the assembly in Laodicea write: "The Amein, the Faithful and True Witness, the Head of God's creation, says these things:  
3:15
"I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were cold or hot.  


World English Bible    
 
Revelation 3     Read This Chapter
3:14
"To the angel of the assembly in Laodicea write: "The Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the Head of God's creation, says these things:  
3:15
"I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were cold or hot.  


We will have to look at the original greek scriptures for that.

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 11:55:32 AM
Sorry im at work so i cant delve into this to deep right now but here is was what the NAS greek lexicon has for beginning in this verse.

 Home > Lexicons > Greek > Arche
The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   746  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
arce from (756)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Arche 1:479,81
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ar-khay'      Noun Feminine 
 
 Definition
beginning, origin the person or thing that commences, the first person or thing in a series, the leader that by which anything begins to be, the origin, the active cause the extremity of a thing
of the corners of a sail the first place, principality, rule, magistracy
of angels and demons 
   
 NAS Word Usage - Total: 56
beginning 38, corners 2, domain 1, elementary 1, elementary* 1, first 1, first preaching 1, principalities 1, rule 4, rulers 6
 
 NAS Verse Count 
Matthew 4
Mark 4
Luke 3
John 8
Acts 4
Romans 1
1 Corinthians 1
Ephesians 3
Philippians 1
Colossians 4
2 Thessalonians 1
Titus 1
Hebrews 6
2 Peter 1
1 John 7
2 John 2
Jude 1
Revelation 3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Total 55
 
And,


 Home > Lexicons > Greek > Archomai
The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   756  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
arcomai middle voice of (757) (through the implication of precedence)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Archomai 1:478,*
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ar'-khom-ahee      Verb 
 
 Definition
to be the first to do (anything), to begin to be chief, leader, ruler to begin, make a beginning 
   
 

 
 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 12:37:44 PM
Hello Roy,

Are you saying through this thread that Jesus existed eternally 'in the bosom' of the Father? You don't believe begotten and created are the same?

And also, are you saying if we refer to Jesus as the Father's creation, that we cannot/should not worship the creation as we should only worship the Creator?

Looking through these posts and the scriptures everyone has posted, I still don't see the huge difference between begotten & created. Either way, the Father brought the Son, Jesus, into existence. Jesus stated He 'came out of the Father'. The Father comes out of no one. Jesus was able to die, the Father has always been immortal. Etc...

Also you stated that from John 1:1-5 this scripture means "This can only mean that the Son was in the bosom of the Father from the very beginning. In which case the Son has the identical character traits bestowed on Him by the Father as the Father is ONE GOD."

But see as you stated, the Son was at the very beginning...but the Father has no beginning. Whether begotton or created, Jesus came out of the Father and then brought everything else into existence. So Jesus had a beginning and the Father does not have a beginning.

In a nutshell, I still don't completely understand the issue. Whether begotton or created, Jesus came out of the Father and has a beginning. I don't understand how being either created or begotten changes anything about Christ.

For me, I wouldn't have a problem if people referred to Jesus as begotton only or created only. It doesn't seem edifying to refer to Him as only one or the other. Kind of a non-issue to me but to each his own.


Thanks,

Marques


Hi! Marques

Your quote; "Are you saying through this thread that Jesus existed eternally 'in the bosom' of the Father?"

No, not I brother, God is saying that; "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him."  (Jn.1:18)

Your quote; "You don't believe begotten and created are the same?"

Yes, I most certainly don't believe that Begotten and Created have the same meaning, and more so when applied to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Let us take the carnal line first, Strong's Concordance;
1)..........Begotten in Hebrew:- Bring forth, give birth to, be born.  #4138, #3318, #3205
2)..........Begotten in Greek:- To be born, to give birth to, to bring forth, to hatch.   #4416, #3439, #1080, 313.
Now
1).........Created in Hebrew:- to create, to make, to create out of nothing, bring something into existence, only God 
            can create something out of nothing.      #1254
2).........Created in Greek:-  to create, to make, creator, only God can create, always the act of God.         #2936 

So from the carnal angle the two words come under totally different numbers with totally different meanings.

 Your quote; "And also, are you saying if we refer to Jesus as the Father's creation, that we cannot/should not worship the creation as we should only worship the Creator?"
                                     
Nowhere does it say that the Father creates anything, it is the Word that does all the creating. (Jn.1:3). He takes all power and authority of the Father and executes His Father's will. He is the Creator/God and only God is entitled to be worshiped and not a creature, a creation. The creature cannot create something out of nothing, that is the sole prerogative of God.

Your quote;     "But see as you stated, the Son was at the very beginning...but the Father has no beginning. Whether begotton or created, Jesus came out of the Father and then brought everything else into existence. So Jesus had a beginning and the Father does not have a beginning."

That is perfectly right, the Father had no beginning and has no end, likewise the Son who is in the bosom of the Father from the beginning has no beginning and no end, they are both eternal, the only difference being that the Son by virtue of being the Son is subject to the Father's Will; “I can do nothing on My own initiative. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is just, because I do not seek My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.  (Jn.5:30).

Your quote; "For me, I wouldn't have a problem if people referred to Jesus as begotton only or created only. It doesn't seem edifying to refer to Him as only one or the other. Kind of a non-issue to me but to each his own."

The difference amounts to this, whether one chooses to worship his Creator/God or the Golden calf. The first is Begotten and the second has been created. There is absolutely nothing of me in this, it is all in God's Word as quoted.

I hope this helps brother.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

   
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 12:40:36 PM
HI Roy

Very nicely explained.  So i have another question.  When i was in with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong he wrote a paper that basically said that we shouldnt pray to Jesus but we are supposed to pray to the Father through Jesus.  So is this basically what you (scriptures you quoted) are saying too?

Anthony

Hi! Anthony

Yes brother. All to the Father in Jesus' name.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 01:31:59 PM
Strong's Number:   746  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
arce from (756)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Arche 1:479,81
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ar-khay'      Noun Feminine 
 
 Definition
beginning, origin the person or thing that commences, the first person or thing in a series, the leader that by which anything begins to be, the origin, the active cause the extremity of a thing
of the corners of a sail the first place, principality, rule, magistracy
of angels and demons 

Home > Lexicons > Greek > Archomai
The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   756  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
arcomai middle voice of (757) (through the implication of precedence
)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Archomai 1:478,*
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
ar'-khom-ahee      Verb 
 
 Definition
to be the first to do (anything), to begin to be chief, leader, ruler to begin, make a beginning 
   
Quote
"Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;


Looking at the definition and the root word of "beginning" in this verse, it is indicating rulership and authority. He is the beginning/origin/head of the creation and that makes him ruler.  Not the beginning of creation.

Here are some other ways this same word is used in scripture.

Tit 3:1   
Remind them to be subject to rulers, to authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good deed,

Ac 11:15   
"And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, just as He did upon us at the beginning. (origin)
Ac 26:4   
"So then, all Jews know my manner of life from my youth up, which from the beginning(origin) was spent among my own nation and at Jerusalem;
Ro 8:38   
For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers
________________________________________
1Co 15:24   
then comes the end, when He delivers up the kingdom to the God and Father, when He has abolished all rule and all authority and power.
________________________________________
________________________________________

Col 1:18   
He is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the first-born from the dead; so that He Himself might come to have first place in everything.
Col 2:10   
and in Him you have been made complete, and He is the head over all rule and authority;
Col 2:15   
When He had disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public display of them, having triumphed over them through Him.
________________________________________
Col 1:16   
For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created by Him and for Him.

Interesting that last part---all things have been created by Him and for Him.  Since He is the origin, the chief, the leader that by which anything begins to be, how could he be created. 

For by Him all things were created.

I think the KJV and its family of bibles didnt translate that well enough.

Just MHO

In Jesus,

Anthony
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 22, 2008, 01:41:34 PM

I think the Scripture in Revelation does cause a bit of phase on this matter, as Young's gives it a bit of a different perspective...

Rev 3:14  `And to the messenger of the assembly of the Laodiceans write: These things saith the Amen, the witness--the faithful and true--the chief of the creation of God;

And it is this passage in Hebrews that makes me hesitate on Christ having a beginning.  We know He was Melchizedek from the OT and this is what it says of Him.

Heb 7:1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of God Most High, who meets with Abraham returning from the combat with the kings and blesses him,
v. 2 to whom Abraham parts a tithe also, from all; being first, indeed, translated king of righteousness,yet thereupon king of Salem, also, which is "king of Peace";"
v. 3 fatherless, motherless, without a genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor consummation of life, yet picturing the Son of God is remaining a priest to a finality."

And this verse...

Heb 9:11 But, when Christ approached, as high-priest of the coming good things, through the greater and more perfect tent, not made by hand, that is, not of this creation,—  (Rotherham)

Christ was with the Father before the universe.

John 17:5 And, now, glorify Me—thou, Father! with Thyself, with the glory which I had, before the world’s existence, with Thee.

I think our understanding on this is hampered by comparing this to what we have here in the physical.  So before the creation of this universe Christ was with the Father and they were One, as in mind and will.  
There does seem that there was some kind of individualness in their being, before the universe, as there appears to be some kind of separation in beings. Maybe their relationship at that time is not something that can be explained in physical terms.  Christ was always the spokesman/Word of the Father, but it was when Christ was born of Mary that He actually became the Father's Son.  And we never knew of the Father until Christ revealed Him.

Mat 11:27  All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.

A lot to consider, I guess we have to pray for our spiritual eyes to be opened a little wider to comprehend all this  :)

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 01:47:32 PM
Great points Kat :) ;) :D ;D 8)
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 22, 2008, 01:56:52 PM
Ditto Kat  :D
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Akira329 on August 22, 2008, 05:34:25 PM
Why can't Jesus be both created and begotten??
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 05:39:26 PM

I think the Scripture in Revelation does cause a bit of phase on this matter, as Young's gives it a bit of a different perspective...

Rev 3:14  `And to the messenger of the assembly of the Laodiceans write: These things saith the Amen, the witness--the faithful and true--the chief of the creation of God;

And it is this passage in Hebrews that makes me hesitate on Christ having a beginning.  We know He was Melchizedek from the OT and this is what it says of Him.

Heb 7:1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of God Most High, who meets with Abraham returning from the combat with the kings and blesses him,
v. 2 to whom Abraham parts a tithe also, from all; being first, indeed, translated king of righteousness,yet thereupon king of Salem, also, which is "king of Peace";"
v. 3 fatherless, motherless, without a genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor consummation of life, yet picturing the Son of God is remaining a priest to a finality."

And this verse...

Heb 9:11 But, when Christ approached, as high-priest of the coming good things, through the greater and more perfect tent, not made by hand, that is, not of this creation,—  (Rotherham)

Christ was with the Father before the universe.

John 17:5 And, now, glorify Me—thou, Father! with Thyself, with the glory which I had, before the world’s existence, with Thee.

I think our understanding on this is hampered by comparing this to what we have here in the physical.  So before the creation of this universe Christ was with the Father and they were One, as in mind and will.   
There does seem that there was some kind of individualness in their being, before the universe, as there appears to be some kind of separation in beings. Maybe their relationship at that time is not something that can be explained in physical terms.  Christ was always the spokesman/Word of the Father, but it was when Christ was born of Mary that He actually became the Father's Son.  And we never knew of the Father until Christ revealed Him.

Mat 11:27  All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.

A lot to consider, I guess we have to pray for our spiritual eyes to be opened a little wider to comprehend all this  :)

mercy, peace and love
Kat




Hi! Kathy

Your quote;    Heb 7:1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of God Most High, who meets 
                    with Abraham returning from the combat with the kings and blesses him, v. 2 to whom Abraham 
                    parts a tithe also, from all; being first, indeed, translated king of righteousness,yet thereupon king 
                    of Salem, also, which is "king of Peace";"  v. 3 fatherless, motherless, without a genealogy, having 
                     neither a beginning of days nor consummation of life, yet picturing the Son of God is remaining a 
                     priest to a  finality."

Is this not what I've been saying all along that the Word/the Son/the Most High Priest/Christ call Him what you will, what's the difference they are all the same God, no mother, of the Old Testament continuing to do the Will of the Father. This is the same Word that started the creation of the universe in obedience to the Father's Will. When it came time for the promised Messiah, the Word/Christ/Son of God entered the body that was prepared in advance; "Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure. “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come
(In the scroll of the book it is written of Me) To do Your will, O God.’"   (Heb.10:5-7).

It was this body occupied by the Word/Son of God that was implanted into Mary by The Father's Spirit to be called by the earthly name Jesus. Hence Jesus becomes the Christ/Son of God and the Creator of all things. "For to which of the angels did He ever say, “You are My Son, Today I have begotten You”? And again, “I will be a Father to Him And He shall be a Son to Me”? And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “And let all the angels of God worship Him.”"  (Heb.1:5-6). The first time the Word was begotten of the Father was before creation, "I will surely tell of the decree of the Lord: He said to Me, ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You." (Ps.2:7). This now is the Word/Son's second birth, when He again brings the firstborn into the world as Jesus the promised Christ/Messiah "But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this creation;"  (Heb.9:11).

Whichever way we look at it, He certainly wasn't created or we'd be worshiping the creature and not the Creator.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 22, 2008, 05:48:52 PM
Quote
Why can't Jesus be both created and begotten??

Akira, read through this whole thread to find that answer.  It is very well argued and explained the difference between created and begotten.
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 22, 2008, 06:02:06 PM
As Ray has pointed out, it is axiomatic that for God to be Father, He must have (in this case) a Son. 

I agree with Marques that the words 'created', 'begotten', 'come out of' present no problem to me any more than 'justification', 'propitiation', 'redemption' present no problem--they are specific aspects (in the context of explaining) of the same thing.

The most telling verse in my understanding is in Hebrews.

Heb 1:1  God, having spoken in former times in fragmentary and varied fashion to our forefathers by the prophets,
Heb 1:2  has in these last days spoken to us by a Son whom he appointed to be the heir of everything and through whom he also made the universe.
Heb 1:3  He is the reflection of God's glory and the exact likeness of his being, and he holds everything together by his powerful word. After he had provided a cleansing from sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Highest Majesty
Heb 1:4  and became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is better than theirs.

Though the KJV and its followers translates the Greek as 'angels' rather than 'messengers', it seems very clear to me that the writer of Hebrews is speaking about the Prophets of old as 'messengers' because that's how he starts his thought.

Heb. 1:3 is the key, for me.  The writer makes three statements (underlined) concerning Christ before his sacrifice.  The third statement helps my understanding the most, because I cannot fathom the full meaning of the others.  "He holds everything together by his powerful word."  He is clearly Christ, the Creator.

It helps because it points out more clearly the WAY in which God interacts with the physical universe.  Surely He created it, but to 'sustain it' or 'hold it together' implies a continued 'interface' between God Who is Spirit and the physical, of which we are a part.  Clearly, it is Christ the Son who is the Creator, the Sustainer, and the 'holder together'.  He is the God who 'comes out of' the Father and HE and the Father are One.  For me, Christ is the interface of Spirit God with physical creation.

It's my personal belief that physical creation itself has much more of a connection with Spirit and much less a 'distinction from' than common understanding.  Heb. 1:3 gives evidence of this.  I am hoping that Ray's conference in Nashville and the materials that come out of that will either correct or strengthen my understanding.

I still maintain that words are not enough to fully comprehend God.  But they are what we have, and we would have precious little understanding without them.  His words are Truth.  We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'. 






Hi! Dave in Tenn

True for God to be a Father He must have a Son or daughter, in this case a Son. But we are told that this Son/Word was with the Father from the very beginning, in His bosom  (Jn.1:1-3...18). If the Son was with the Father from eternity then He wasn't or could not have been created. The only option open would be for the Father to give birth to Him. Which is the point I am making. Christ was not created but legitimately born of the Father. And there is a very big difference between the two where Deity is concerned.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
   
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 22, 2008, 06:36:11 PM
I actually can see where Roy is coming from as I look in the scriptures regarding begotten & created. But we should probably drop this issue before it becomes an argument filled thread that eventually gets locked down.

Personally, I think people may look at begotten & created as the same but I do not believe it is done as a way to demean Jesus. That's why I don't believe this is an issue worth all the fuss. I always looked at Christ as 'out of the Father'. Whether that is begotten or created, I never put that much thought into it. It doesn't seem to be an issue that keeps one from being of the Elect which is what our main goal is, you know?

This issue just seems kind of petty but that's just my opinion. If others have stronger feelings regarding this, I don't mean to belittle your opinon. It's just I don't believe that most of the members here take great issue with using begotten or created or 'out of'. Either usage doesn't change the fact that we are to live our lives after Him. Neither usage is of any edifying to make one spiritually mature.

Also, how about emailing Ray to see what he thinks?



Thanks,

Marques
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Dave in Tenn on August 22, 2008, 06:59:51 PM
From Roy:  This how I see it, brother, but I don't quite understand your statement; "We just need to know what they really MEAN.  I certainly don't claim to, and would be highly reluctant to worship a God who COULD be 'explained'."   Maybe you'd like to enlighten me?

First off...I don't disagree with your understanding of God or the relationship of Father and Son.

The only way I can think of to 'enlighten' you about what I said is with another example.  Christ is brother, savior, husband, master, in us, with us and many other things in relation to us.  All true and all at the same time.  If I wanted to argue that Christ could not be my brother AND my bridegroom (especially since I am a man) at the same time, you wouldn't agree with that, surely.

These are relationships to which WE are a party, yet we still cannot FULLY understand them.  It is exceedingly more important that I be careful in meditating on the nature of the Father/Son relationship of God seeing that I am mere flesh and am not yet a party to that relationship.  It is the whole council of God that will bring the fullest understanding.

This is way over my paygrade, but I believe that we cannot get this 'right' (though we can obviously grow closer to a more full understanding).  I believe the very last idol to be smashed among even the Very Elect of God will be their own personal mental (not necessarily Theological) conception/understanding of God.  Until then, I want to grow in understanding, but never build an altar to my own understanding of God.

I'm watching the thread with interest, but I don't want to get into a debate...especially since I believe in "Omni-Wrongness" (especially my own) when it comes to this.  

 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Akira329 on August 22, 2008, 10:09:52 PM
How can anything be born if the means of birth aren't first created?
Jesus came out of God?
Wasn't it all a process??
How does this question his deity? or whether or not he is worthy to be praised?
Didn't Ray cover this quite extensively in his trinity paper and the Nashville conference??
I'm surprised at the questions that appear on here sometimes?
Its like we don't read the material at all.
Besides I believe Ray will tackle this topic in the upcoming conference so till then......

Antaiwan
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Snowfire on August 23, 2008, 02:57:05 AM
If it had not been for the “of whom are all things” Christ would have died and never been resurrected. He would have ceased to exist.

For the same reason I don’t think Christ could have “emptied himself” had there not been an “of whom are all things” to bring him (Christ) into existence again as the Son of the Father.
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: OBrenda on August 23, 2008, 07:40:53 AM
Heidi

Just had to let you know that your post added greatly to my struggle through this thread.  I'm trying to organize what I've learned from everybody here.  And I want to throw out whats clanging in my head to see if I'm missing the forrest for the trees...?

(Lets remember that Ray has enlightened us from the scriptures that God is also Female)

As a earthly mother, I understand to give birth, is to push out of myself, something that was created inside of me, a child/being very similar to myself [with some help from the father] ;)

Now Christ is a mirror reflection of the Father, [DNA from only one parent] think along the lines of Cloning, which takes the DNA from one living creature, and creates a identical. We now understand through science, that this is possible to do in the physical.

Is it possible, that prior to the creation of the universe God created Christ from exactly himself/DNA that was separate and at the same time everything that God was?  Two but One?

God created Adam, and out of Adam God took something? and created Eve!
She was created out of exactly the same stuff/DNA as Adam.  Two but One?

Be it Spiritual or earthly through these Two but One, comes several million kazillion as the sands of the seas...decedents?

Father God, through Jesus God.......creates everyhing........
They create man, and together through the female.....create many nations

And when Father God placed the Divine/DNA exact mirror of himself/Jesus in Mary.
The Word/God/Creator became Flesh and dwelt among us.

When we worship Christ, are we worshiping the creation, or the creator?
My Guess here would be it depends on the understanding of the Depths of who Jesus is?

What say you?

 ???
Brenda


Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: winner08 on August 23, 2008, 07:49:57 AM
I know this is simple minded but who were we told by Jesus  to worship?




                                            Darren
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 23, 2008, 08:15:56 AM
I know this is simple minded but who were we told by Jesus  to worship?




                                            Darren


Hi! Darren

We worship the Father in Spirit and the Father only, He is a jealous God, “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me," (Ex.20:5). But we pray to Him in the name of His only begotten Son Jesus Christ. That's in my opinion.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Heidi on August 23, 2008, 09:08:12 AM
We worship the Father in Spirit and the Father only, He is a jealous God, “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me," (Ex.20:5). But we pray to Him in the name of His only begotten Son Jesus Christ.

Jesus was God in the old testament, when praying to God the Father we ask Him that His will be done.....in the name of Jesus. 

Brenda, like you I also think along those lines.  Jesus was the only begotten Son.....because no one else have been begotten of God that way. ;D

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 23, 2008, 10:53:02 AM
Quote
We worship the Father in Spirit and the Father only, He is a jealous God, “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me," (Ex.20:5). But we pray to Him in the name of His only begotten Son Jesus Christ. That's in my opinion.

You are right Roy.  But i need help with this. 

The KJV Strong's Version   
 
Revelation 5     Read This Chapter
5:12
Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing
5:13
And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever. 


New International Version   
 
Revelation 5     Read This Chapter
5:12
In a loud voice they sang: "Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!
5:13
Then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea, and all that is in them, singing: "To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!" 


The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   2129  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
eujlogiva from the same as (2127)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Eulogia 2:754,275
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
yoo-log-ee'-ah      Noun Feminine 
 
 Definition
praise, laudation, panegyric: of Christ or God fine discourse, polished language
in a bad sense, language artfully adapted to captivate the hearer: fair speaking, fine speeches an invocation of blessing, benediction consecration a (concrete) blessing, benefit 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 16
blessing 11, bounty 2, bountifully + (1909)&version=kjv 2, fair speech 1
 
   KJV Verse Count   
Romans 2
1 Corinthians 1
2 Corinthians 2
Galatians 1
Ephesians 1
Hebrews 2
James 1
1 Peter 1
Revelation 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 14
 
The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon

 Strong's Number:   2127  Browse Lexicon 
Original Word Word Origin
eujlogevw from a compound of (2095) and (3056)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Eulogeo 2:754,275
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
yoo-log-eh'-o      Verb 
 
 Definition
to praise, celebrate with praises to invoke blessings to consecrate a thing with solemn prayers
to ask God's blessing on a thing pray God to bless it to one's use pronounce a consecratory blessing on of God
to cause to prosper, to make happy, to bestow blessings on favoured of God, blessed 
   
 King James Word Usage - Total: 44
bless 43, praise 1  
 
   KJV Verse Count   
Matthew 6
Mark 6
Luke 13
John 1
Acts 1
Romans 1
1 Corinthians 3
Galatians 1
Ephesians 1
Hebrews 6
James 1
1 Peter 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 41
 

These are the only two verses that i can find that may say praise Jesus.  But more translations has blessings than praise.  The word for those has got to be used as a noun and not a verb.  And when you look at how its been used throughout scripture, as blessing(s) more than praise.  I think the NIV may have translated wrong with praise. 

What say you guys?

Anthony,

ps--- I was going to start this post in response to Akiras post
Quote
How does this question his deity? or whether or not he is worthy to be praised?
And ask can you find me a verse that specifically says he(Jesus) is worthy to be praised.

Quote
Insert Quote
Quote from: winner08 on Today at 05:49:57 AM
I know this is simple minded but who were we told by Jesus  to worship?




                                            Darren

Darren, think about it like this. Jesus came in his Fathers name and worshipped him.  If he would of came in His own name what would have happened?

Joh 5:43 - Show Context
I have come in my Father's name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him

Imagine this verse....

Joh 11:41 - Show Context
So they took away the stone. Then Jesus looked up and said, "Father, I thank you that you have heard me.
 
going like this...

"Jesus, I thank myself that i heard myself"


Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 23, 2008, 11:03:50 AM
Another thing...

If we are to praise Jesus, what would have been the point of Him introducing us to the Father?
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Kat on August 23, 2008, 11:19:17 AM

I think a little review of Ray's article 'Is God a Close Trinity or an Open Family' will help us get our bearings on this matter.


                               Who and What is GOD?

"There is ONE GOD, the FATHER, out of Whom ALL is..." (I Cor. 8:6).

"For there is ONE God" (I Tim. 2:5).

"You are my witnesses whether there is any god, any Power, any besides ME" (Isa. 44:8 Moffatt Translation).

"The ONE Who is operating ALL in accord with the counsel of HIS will..." (Eph. 1:11).

"Out of Him and through Him and for Him is ALL: to HIM be the glory for the eons! Amen!" (Rom. 11:36).

"...your heavenly Father IS PERFECT" (Mat. 5:48)

"God IS LOVE" (I John 4:08).

"God IS SPIRIT" (John 4:24).

"...the INVISIBLE GOD" (II Cor. 4:4).

"Now it is eonian life that they may know Thee, the ONLY TRUE GOD, and Him Whom Thou dost commission, Jesus Christ" (John 17:3).

Jesus called His Father "...the ONLY TRUE GOD" (Jn. 17:3).

"God is NOT A MAN..." (I Sam. 15:29).


                           Who and What is Jesus Christ?

Jesus Christ IS A MAN! "For there is ONE GOD, and ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind, A MAN, Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).

"Thou art the Christ, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD" (Mat. 16:16).

"Christ, Who is the IMAGE of the invisible God" (II Cor. 4:4).

"The Lord Jesus Christ, the SON OF THE FATHER" (II Jn 3).

"The BEGINNING of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14 JKV)

"God’s CREATIVE ORIGINAL" (Rev. 3:14 CLNT).

"If God were your Father, you would have loved Me. For OUT OF GOD I CAME FORTH and am arriving" (John 8:42).

"Nor Jesus said to him, Why are you terming Me good? No one is good except ONE, GOD" (Mark 10:18).

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward God, and God was the Word" (John 1:1). (This is the proper order of the Greek words. Jesus is the Logos or Spokesman of God).

I believe most can see from the above Scriptures that there are numerous and fundamental differences between the Father and Jesus the Son. However, there are still reasons to ask whether or not Jesus Christ, the Son of God the Father, is not also "God?"  Is Christ for example, not worthy our worship? Dare we worship any but "God?" And if Christ is indeed "God," when isn’t He of the very same status, rank, authority, etc., as His Father? Good questions. Let’s take them one at a time.

Is Christ God? YES HE IS!

"Yet to the Son [this is GOD speaking]: ‘Thy throne, O GOD, is for the eon of the eon..." (Heb. 1:08).

And also:

Who [Jesus], being inherently in the form of God, deems it not pillaging [taking by force or plundering] to be EQUAL WITH GOD" (Phil. 2:6).

Is Christ worthy of worship? YES HE IS !

"And lo! A leper, coming to Him, WORSHIPED Him, saying..." (Mat. 8:2),

"lo! One approaching Him [Jesus], a chief, WORSHIPED Him..." (Mat. 9:18),

"Now those in the ship WORSHIP Him, saying, ‘truly, God’s Son art Thou!’"

"Yet she, coming, WORSHIPS Him, saying, ‘Lord, help me!’" (Mat. 15:25).

So Christ is called "God," and did not consider it pillaging to be "equal" with God, and was often "worshiped." So surely, even if Christ is not the third person of a trinity, He must at least be the second person of a duet! SURELY, HE IS NOT! Let me explain.

Jesus IS God! True, but this fact does NOT make Him the FATHER! Let us always read and believe the Scriptures. The English word "God" is translated from the Greek word Theos which means PLACER or DISPOSER. ANYONE to whom the Father gives such an office of "placer or disposer" is a God! Notice what God says in Psalm 82:6,

"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High."

Jesus explains this verse for us:

"Jesus answered them, ‘Is it not written in your law, that ‘I say you are gods’? If He said those were gods, to whom the word of God came [and the scripture can not be annulled], are you saying to Him Whom the Father hallows and dispatches into the world that You are blaspheming,’ seeing that I said, ‘Son of God am I’? If I am not doing My Father’s works, do not believe Me. Yet if I am doing them, and if ever you are not believing Me, be believing the works, that you may be knowing and believing that in Me is the Father, and I am in the Father."

Okay then, let’s notice a few very important points. Jesus never came out and said "I AM GOD!" He always called Himself, "The Son OF God." Recall that Jesus did not consider it "pillaging" to be equal with God. That is, he didn’t need to steal, or take His office by FORCE, because His God, the Father, GAVE ALL THINGS TO HIM FREELY! Though Jesus is certainly "God," we must always remember that everything that made Him "God" (like His Father), WAS GIVEN TO HIM! Is there anyone who would suggest that someone GAVE God the Father all that He possesses? I think not. There is clearly a distinction--we have a "Father" and a "Son," NOT two equal Gods of a so-called trinity.
http://bible-truths.com/trinity.html
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 23, 2008, 12:04:58 PM
Another thing...

If we are to praise Jesus, what would have been the point of Him introducing us to the Father?

Php 2:6  Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
 
Php 2:7  But made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men:
 
Php 2:8  And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
 
Php 2:9  Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a name which is above every name:
 
Php 2:10  That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things in earth and things under the earth;
 
Php 2:11  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

I believe this sums up the answer to your question Anthony, if we love, praise, follow and exalt Jesus Christ we are also doing the very same thing to His and our Father as they are of One Mind and One Spirit. When we worship Christ we are worshipping the Father who sent Him to us, Christ is the perfect Ambassador for God our Father.

Peace,

Joe
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 23, 2008, 12:41:51 PM
Wow i cant believe i overlooked those plain scriptures Joe. Yes that did sum up that stupid question of mine.  You and Kat hit the nail right on top of the head. 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 23, 2008, 01:10:18 PM
Hi Roy and AK4,

I have been studying Ray's paper on The Father's will.....(THE FATHER'S WILL? . . . . . . . . . . . Mobile Conference 2006)

"Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

The beginning was the Word of God, what did God began with?  Jesus Christ, right?  The Word, that’s what God began with, Jesus Christ is the beginning.

In Gen. 1:1 it says, “In the beginning[ Heb: reshiyth - spec. Firstfruits] God [Heb: Elohim] created the heavens and the earth”
 
We read in 1 Cor 15:20  “But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the Firstfruit of those who slept.”

That Jesus Christ “became the Firstfruit of those who slept.”  Who is the Firstfurit?  JESUS CHRIST.

Where did Jesus come from:  John 7:29; John 13:3; John 9:42; John 16: 27-28; 1 John 4:9, 14.
 
Jesus was created by the Father; Heb 1:2; Rev 3:14.  Jesus Christ was created and than became the Creator of all.  So when you talk about Jesus Christ, you are talking about God.  But you are talking about the One who was begotten in the God family, and one who could be emptied and formed such as a man.

A couple of other points here.  Christ said to the Pharisees, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." (John 8:58).  He didn’t say I was, He said “I am.”  And what did He tell Moses?  Moses said who will I say sent me and He said tell,  “I AM THAT I AM” (Exo. 3:14), or I Am what I will be, is what the Hebrew indicates.
So Adam, Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Jacob and the Hebrews, never knew God the Father, they knew Jesus Christ - Yahweh.  When they hung Christ on the cross, they crucified their own Creator."

So Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament.  He is the reason Elohim is plural, “and God said let US.”
So the Father is doing the creating, but it is done through His Son, Jesus Christ, His first born.  Now for scriptural proof, in Heb. 1:8 it says "Thy throne, O God, is for the eon of the eons ...”  Now I know the Jehovah Witness and I’ve read all their stupid ways of trying to get around that verse, and it just won’t smoke.  It means what it says, God addresses Jesus Christ as “Thy throne, O God,” and the O is in there, it’s in the Greek and it’s back in the Hebrew where this verse is quoted from as well.

I hope this helps a bit.

Heidi



Hi! Heidi

Thank you for your response. Please allow me to answer your post, quote by quote. Please note I'm not trying to influence, teach, preach, or contradict Ray in anyway. I am just expressing my view and what the Scriptures are saying to me. It is purely my opinion that we're discussing.

1)......"Rev 3:14  And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;"

In reply:-  Where does it say that God created Christ? I don't see the word create, do you? It says the creation of God. so God/Word is the Creator, not the created. It is the Revelation of Jesus Christ "..who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw." (Rev.1:2).

2)....."The beginning was the Word of God, what did God began with?  Jesus Christ, right?  The Word, that’s what God began with, Jesus Christ is the beginning."

In reply:-  No it didn't begin with Jesus Christ, Jesus is not yet in the picture, it began with the Word. Let's keep with the Scriptures. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being."  (Jn.1:1-3). What this Scripture is saying, is that the Word was with the Father from the very beginning, that is from eternity, and that the Word was God and all things were created by Him, the Word.

3)…… In Gen. 1:1 it says, “In the beginning[ Heb: reshiyth - spec. Firstfruits] God [Heb: Elohim] created the heavens and the earth”

My reply
:-   Indeed He is the First Fruit of creation, ( First Fruit that is first born, not created) the Son of God the Word/God. The First Fruit/Word/God created the heavens and earth doing the Will of His Father. God is not a created being.

4)........We read in 1 Cor 15:20  “But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the Firstfruit of those who slept.”.....That Jesus Christ “became the Firstfruit of those who slept.”  Who is the Firstfurit?  JESUS CHRIST." That Jesus Christ “became the Firstfruit of those who slept.”  Who is the Firstfurit?  JESUS CHRIST.

In Reply:-  Absolutely true. “YOU ARE MY SON, TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU”?
And again,
“I WILL BE A FATHER TO HIM AND HE SHALL BE A SON TO ME”? And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “AND LET ALL THE ANGELS OF GOD WORSHIP HIM.”  (Heb.1:5-6).
The first time the Word was Born was before creation commenced now again He is born into the world that wasn’t in existence before. This time as Jesus Christ in the body that was prepared for Him/Word in advance. “Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “SACRIFICE AND OFFERING YOU HAVE NOT DESIRED, BUT A BODY YOU HAVE PREPARED FOR ME; IN WHOLE BURNT OFFERINGS AND sacrifices FOR SIN YOU HAVE TAKEN NO PLEASURE. “THEN I SAID, ‘BEHOLD, I HAVE COME (IN THE SCROLL OF THE BOOK IT IS WRITTEN OF ME) TO DO YOUR WILL, O GOD.’ ”  (Heb.10:5-7).  This is God the Son speaking with His Father. Jesus Christ the legitimate Son/Word of the Father. He is not only the First Fruit of creation but now He is also the First Fruit of those in the world who slept in the world before His arrival. 

5)……… Where did Jesus come from:  John 7:29; John 13:3; John 9:42; John 16: 27-28; 1 John 4:9, 14.

My reply:- Jn.7:29 “I know Him, because I am from Him, and He sent Me.”  What does that tell us about His origin, we know He comes from the Father, He has told us that several times.
Jn.9:42  There is no Vs. 42
Jn.13:3   “Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands, and that He had come forth from God and was going back to God,”  We know He came from the Father, we have already seen that He was born of the Father and not created by Him.
Jn.!6:27-28  “ “I came forth from the Father and have come into the world; I am leaving the world again and going to the Father.”  His disciples *said, “Lo, now You are speaking plainly and are not using a figure of speech.”  There is nothing new that we didn’t know before but none of it tells us of His origin, that is what we are discussing.

6)………Jesus was created by the Father; Heb 1:2; Rev 3:14.  Jesus Christ was created and than became the Creator of all.  So when you talk about Jesus Christ, you are talking about God.  But you are talking about the One who was begotten in the God family, and one who could be emptied and formed such as a man.

My reply    Where has this come from? I see no Scripture that says that Jesus Christ was created by the Father, can you?  “…in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.”  (Heb.1:2). There is no mention of Jesus Christ being created. “To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God, says this.”  Rev.3:14).  I can see no mention that Jesus Christ was created. The Amen, the Beginning, the Witness indicates a Creator not something created. A, W & B are in upper case for that reason. There is no mention of Jesus Christ being created.

7)………A couple of other points here.  Christ said to the Pharisees, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." (John 8:58).  He didn’t say I was, He said “I am.”  And what did He tell Moses?  Moses said who will I say sent me and He said tell,  “I AM THAT I AM” (Exo. 3:14), or I Am what I will be, is what the Hebrew indicates.
So Adam, Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Jacob and the Hebrews, never knew God the Father, they knew Jesus Christ - Yahweh.  When they hung Christ on the cross, they crucified their own Creator."

So Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament.  He is the reason Elohim is plural, “and God said let US.”
So the Father is doing the creating, but it is done through His Son, Jesus Christ, His first born.  Now for scriptural proof, in Heb. 1:8 it says "Thy throne, O God, is for the eon of the eons ...”  Now I know the Jehovah Witness and I’ve read all their stupid ways of trying to get around that verse, and it just won’t smoke.  It means what it says, God addresses Jesus Christ as “Thy throne, O God,” and the O is in there, it’s in the Greek and it’s back in the Hebrew where this verse is quoted from as well.

My reply:-  Christ (Jesus is not yet born) is the God Yahweh of the Old Testament, I have never denied that, but it has nothing to do with the present topic. What you are saying here is something I just don’t understand, it has no relevance to what is being discussed except for one thing and that is;  “So the Father is doing the creating, but it is done through His Son, Jesus Christ, His first born “ Wrong! He certainly is not and nowhere does it say so. The Son/Word is doing the creating in accord with His Father's Will, He is the Creator and not the Father. Please read (Jn.1:1-3) very carefully before making that claim, because it isn’t true and we are here looking for the truth with Scriptural proof avoiding human guess work.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK 

PS:- Your quotes are highlighted in red



Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 23, 2008, 03:10:36 PM

I think a little review of Ray's article 'Is God a Close Trinity or an Open Family' will help us get our bearings on this matter.


                               Who and What is GOD?

"There is ONE GOD, the FATHER, out of Whom ALL is..." (I Cor. 8:6).

"For there is ONE God" (I Tim. 2:5).

"You are my witnesses whether there is any god, any Power, any besides ME" (Isa. 44:8 Moffatt Translation).

"The ONE Who is operating ALL in accord with the counsel of HIS will..." (Eph. 1:11).

"Out of Him and through Him and for Him is ALL: to HIM be the glory for the eons! Amen!" (Rom. 11:36).

"...your heavenly Father IS PERFECT" (Mat. 5:48)

"God IS LOVE" (I John 4:08).

"God IS SPIRIT" (John 4:24).

"...the INVISIBLE GOD" (II Cor. 4:4).

"Now it is eonian life that they may know Thee, the ONLY TRUE GOD, and Him Whom Thou dost commission, Jesus Christ" (John 17:3).

Jesus called His Father "...the ONLY TRUE GOD" (Jn. 17:3).

"God is NOT A MAN..." (I Sam. 15:29).


                           Who and What is Jesus Christ?

Jesus Christ IS A MAN! "For there is ONE GOD, and ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind, A MAN, Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).

"Thou art the Christ, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD" (Mat. 16:16).

"Christ, Who is the IMAGE of the invisible God" (II Cor. 4:4).

"The Lord Jesus Christ, the SON OF THE FATHER" (II Jn 3).

"The BEGINNING of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14 JKV)

"God's CREATIVE ORIGINAL" (Rev. 3:14 CLNT).

"If God were your Father, you would have loved Me. For OUT OF GOD I CAME FORTH and am arriving" (John 8:42).

"Nor Jesus said to him, Why are you terming Me good? No one is good except ONE, GOD" (Mark 10:18).

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward God, and God was the Word" (John 1:1). (This is the proper order of the Greek words. Jesus is the Logos or Spokesman of God).

I believe most can see from the above Scriptures that there are numerous and fundamental differences between the Father and Jesus the Son. However, there are still reasons to ask whether or not Jesus Christ, the Son of God the Father, is not also "God?"  Is Christ for example, not worthy our worship? Dare we worship any but "God?" And if Christ is indeed "God," when isn’t He of the very same status, rank, authority, etc., as His Father? Good questions. Let’s take them one at a time.

Is Christ God? YES HE IS!

"Yet to the Son [this is GOD speaking]: ‘Thy throne, O GOD, is for the eon of the eon..." (Heb. 1:08).

And also:

Who [Jesus], being inherently in the form of God, deems it not pillaging [taking by force or plundering] to be EQUAL WITH GOD" (Phil. 2:6).

Is Christ worthy of worship? YES HE IS !

"And lo! A leper, coming to Him, WORSHIPED Him, saying..." (Mat. 8:2),

"lo! One approaching Him [Jesus], a chief, WORSHIPED Him..." (Mat. 9:18),

"Now those in the ship WORSHIP Him, saying, ‘truly, God's Son art Thou!’"

"Yet she, coming, WORSHIPS Him, saying, ‘Lord, help me!’" (Mat. 15:25).

So Christ is called "God," and did not consider it pillaging to be "equal" with God, and was often "worshiped." So surely, even if Christ is not the third person of a trinity, He must at least be the second person of a duet! SURELY, HE IS NOT! Let me explain.

Jesus IS God! True, but this fact does NOT make Him the FATHER! Let us always read and believe the Scriptures. The English word "God" is translated from the Greek word Theos which means PLACER or DISPOSER. ANYONE to whom the Father gives such an office of "placer or disposer" is a God! Notice what God says in Psalm 82:6,

"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High."

Jesus explains this verse for us:

"Jesus answered them, ‘Is it not written in your law, that ‘I say you are gods’? If He said those were gods, to whom the word of God came [and the scripture can not be annulled], are you saying to Him Whom the Father hallows and dispatches into the world that You are blaspheming,’ seeing that I said, ‘Son of God am I’? If I am not doing My Father’s works, do not believe Me. Yet if I am doing them, and if ever you are not believing Me, be believing the works, that you may be knowing and believing that in Me is the Father, and I am in the Father."

Okay then, let’s notice a few very important points. Jesus never came out and said "I AM GOD!" He always called Himself, "The Son OF God." Recall that Jesus did not consider it "pillaging" to be equal with God. That is, he didn’t need to steal, or take His office by FORCE, because His God, the Father, GAVE ALL THINGS TO HIM FREELY! Though Jesus is certainly "God," we must always remember that everything that made Him "God" (like His Father), WAS GIVEN TO HIM! Is there anyone who would suggest that someone GAVE God the Father all that He possesses? I think not. There is clearly a distinction--we have a "Father" and a "Son," NOT two equal Gods of a so-called trinity.
http://bible-truths.com/trinity.html
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat




Hi! Kathy

Jesus Christ IS A MAN! "For there is ONE GOD, and ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind, A MAN, Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward God, and God was the Word" (John 1:1). (This is the proper order of the Greek words. Jesus is the Logos or Spokesman of God).

I don't have a Bible or any translation that puts those words in that order, which makes the Word out to be the Father, so I cannot truthfully deny that. But if that is so then how can it be possible for the Word/Son to be in the bosom of the Father/Word? This can only be possible if we take Jesus to His word; “I and the Father are one.”  (Jn.10:30). Then it becomes possible, which means that He is the identical snapshot image of the Father with all the Father's character traits. Hence worthy of worship. And not created but legitimately born of the Father.

The man Jesus Christ is the promised Messiah the Word the Son of God. There is but ONE GOD, but the Word was with God in His bosom, Christ is the ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind. Jesus is but the flesh representative of the Word as the Word being God cannot die, that is why the Word had to divest Himself of all His Deity and come into the world as Jesus the man. Still the ONE GOD and still the ONE MEDIATOR. “I and the Father are one.”  (Jn.10:30).

Or how do we account for:-

"Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually." (Heb.7:3). This is speaking about the Word the Son of God.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     

PS   I have highlighted Ray's words in red.
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: ciy on August 23, 2008, 05:04:59 PM

"Therefore let all the house of Israel know assurdly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and
Christ." Acts 2:36

Jesus had the anointing of Christ which made him "Jesus the Christ".  One of the major heretical doctrines of Babylon is to get the people to kneel before a physical Jesus hanging on a cross.  That keeps all looking at a physical Jesus instead of the anointing of Christ which is in Jesus and also must be in you as in Colossians 1:27 "Christ in you, the hope of glory".  That same anointing is the Light that shineth in all men and "they comprehend it not."

Speaking of John 1:1-5, when Ray spoke on the word "Grace" being "divine influence on the heart" and in his talk used the meaning in place of the word in several scriptures, it led me to do some studies likewise.  The following is one that really intrigues me and is very interesting to meditate upon.

According to Strong's the meaning of Word (logos) is "something spoken including the thought" so I will substitute that for the word "Word" and follow that thru:

In the beginning was the (something spoken including the thought), and the (something spoken including the thought) was with God, and the (something spoken including the thought) was God.
[Now the "something spoken including the thought" is God]

The (something spoken including the thought) was in the beginning with (something spoken including the thought).

All things were made by (something spoken including the thought); and without (something spoken including the thought) was not any thing made that was made.

In (something spoken including the thought) was life[if you will chase down the meaning of life it is spirit]; and the life [or spirit] was the light of men.

And the light shineth in darkness[darkness is what man walks in on earth, which is the carnal or physical]; and the darkness [or physical] comprehended it [or spirit] not.

I have no conclusion just thought it is interesting to ponder.

CIY

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 23, 2008, 06:13:40 PM


Or how do we account for:-

"Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually." (Heb.7:3). This is speaking about the Word the Son of God.



Hi Roy,

We all should be very careful when attempting to teach a doctrine based on one verse. Read Chapters 6 & 7 in their entirety. We see that Melchizedek is a type of Christ yes but consider this, we do have a geneology of Jesus Christ, Jesus died and was resurrected. Melchizedek does not have a geneology recorded in the scriptures, nor was his birth recorded nor his death. There is no record of a man making him a priest. He is a type a shadow as King David is a type/shadow. It speaks of the legacy of Melchizedek being fulfilled and completed by Jesus Christ.

This is another riddle/parable (Eze 17:2) that does not have a simple explanation but needs to be searched out.

Christ's priesthood began before the foundation of the earth, before man, before geneologies and will not cease even after God is All in All. To me it seems that you are saying Jesus Christ is not the Son of God but the Clone of God. If they are indeed 2 parts of the same exact entity then how could it also be true that no man has seen or heard the voice of God? What makes Christ and the Father One is the same thing that will one day make us One with Him, a single spiritual Mind that only seeks to do the will of the Father.

Peace,

Joe

Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 23, 2008, 09:19:46 PM
Okay think on this.

The Word had a physical body prepared for him.

Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure. “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come (In the scroll of the book it is written of Me) To do Your will, O God.’ (Heb.10:5-7).

We have been predestined (a body prepared for us too since God has foreknowledge) and created with physical body and basically had the same thing for us right?....
 
Ro 8:29 - Show Context
For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

Ro 8:30 - Show Context
And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.

Eph 1:5 - Show Context
he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will--

Eph 1:11 - Show Context
In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will,

So as for us being resurrected, we will be born of God and not recreated right?...

John 1:11-14
11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Same as the Word.  The Word wasnt created but born.  The Words' physical body, Jesus, was made/created/prepared

We will also be born of God.  We are created now, but we will all be born again.

Joh 3:3 - Show Context
In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

Joh 3:7 - Show Context
You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'

1Pe 1:23 - Show Context
For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God

(An exerpt from Rays paper 12 Truths to Understanding Scriptures)
No one could comprehend every verse in the Old Testament Scriptures that represented Jesus, but they could learn the PRINCIPLE by which Jesus fulfilled all the law and all the prophets. And that is how the apostles and the two disciples on the road to Emmaus had their understanding of the Scriptures opened in just a very short time. When the Scriptures speak of Israel they speak of Jesus, and when they speak of Jesus they speak of us, for "…as Jesus is, so are we in the world" (I John 4:17).  (bolding done by me)

So as the Word was born of God so will we.  We wont be recreated just like the Word couldnt be created but born.

(An exerpt from Rays paper 12 Truths to Understanding Scriptures)
Jesus Christ is our Example of just how man (mankind) is to "be made into the Image of God." Jesus is our example, our way, and our destiny:

"For whom He did foreknow, [that’s US, and eventually all humanity, I Cor. 15:28], He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the Firstborn among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29).

Jesus was made a physical man so that He could show us the way to the spirit God.

And so it was that this Jesus, in the flesh, who became human, became a man of flesh, was conformed into the spiritual "Image of God," and spoke to us through His "words of spirit." It is Jesus Who "was the word of God" back in Genesis, Who did the speaking when "…God [the Word] said, Let there be light" (Gen. 1:3). It was "the word" in Genesis 1:26 Who said: "Make will We humanity in Our Image…" (Concordant Version).

What kind of words were those words, which The Word spoke back there in the garden? Why they were the words of Jesus, and Jesus plainly tells us that His words "ARE SPIRIT" (John 6:63).

Is it just me, but just as i stated in one of my earlier posts and with CIYs' post--

Quote
Speaking of John 1:1-5, when Ray spoke on the word "Grace" being "divine influence on the heart" and in his talk used the meaning in place of the word in several scriptures, it led me to do some studies likewise.  The following is one that really intrigues me and is very interesting to meditate upon.

According to Strong's the meaning of Word (logos) is "something spoken including the thought" so I will substitute that for the word "Word" and follow that thru:

In the beginning was the (something spoken including the thought), and the (something spoken including the thought) was with God, and the (something spoken including the thought) was God.
[Now the "something spoken including the thought" is God]

The (something spoken including the thought) was in the beginning with (something spoken including the thought).

All things were made by (something spoken including the thought); and without (something spoken including the thought) was not any thing made that was made.


Being predestined (something spoken including the thought) When the Word started creating/creation and since....

Quote
Jesus Christ is our Example of just how man (mankind) is to "be made into the Image of God." Jesus is our example, our way, and our destiny:
(Rays)

in this way doesnt it show how the Word was begotten and not created, but his physical, Jesus, was created.

Im will end this here because i know in this post my thoughts are everywhere because my niece and nephew keep interrupting in mid thought.

What do you guys think on this?

In Jesus,

Anthony

ps i didnt get to fully finish Reading Rays 12 Truths to Understanding Scripture again (i've read it before but its been awhile) before i posted this so i may be way off base,  If so im sorry.
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 24, 2008, 01:34:01 PM
Okay think on this.

The Word had a physical body prepared for him.

Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says, “Sacrifice and offering You have not desired, But a body You have prepared for Me; In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure. “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come (In the scroll of the book it is written of Me) To do Your will, O God.’ (Heb.10:5-7).

We have been predestined (a body prepared for us too since God has foreknowledge) and created with physical body and basically had the same thing for us right?....
 
Ro 8:29 - Show Context
For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

Ro 8:30 - Show Context
And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.

Eph 1:5 - Show Context
he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will--

Eph 1:11 - Show Context
In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will,

So as for us being resurrected, we will be born of God and not recreated right?...

John 1:11-14
11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God-- 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God. 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Same as the Word.  The Word wasnt created but born.  The Words' physical body, Jesus, was made/created/prepared

We will also be born of God.  We are created now, but we will all be born again.

Joh 3:3 - Show Context
In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

Joh 3:7 - Show Context
You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.'

1Pe 1:23 - Show Context
For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God

(An exerpt from Rays paper 12 Truths to Understanding Scriptures)
No one could comprehend every verse in the Old Testament Scriptures that represented Jesus, but they could learn the PRINCIPLE by which Jesus fulfilled all the law and all the prophets. And that is how the apostles and the two disciples on the road to Emmaus had their understanding of the Scriptures opened in just a very short time. When the Scriptures speak of Israel they speak of Jesus, and when they speak of Jesus they speak of us, for "…as Jesus is, so are we in the world" (I John 4:17).  (bolding done by me)

So as the Word was born of God so will we.  We wont be recreated just like the Word couldnt be created but born.

(An exerpt from Rays paper 12 Truths to Understanding Scriptures)
Jesus Christ is our Example of just how man (mankind) is to "be made into the Image of God." Jesus is our example, our way, and our destiny:

"For whom He did foreknow, [that’s US, and eventually all humanity, I Cor. 15:28], He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the Firstborn among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29).

Jesus was made a physical man so that He could show us the way to the spirit God.

And so it was that this Jesus, in the flesh, who became human, became a man of flesh, was conformed into the spiritual "Image of God," and spoke to us through His "words of spirit." It is Jesus Who "was the word of God" back in Genesis, Who did the speaking when "…God [the Word] said, Let there be light" (Gen. 1:3). It was "the word" in Genesis 1:26 Who said: "Make will We humanity in Our Image…" (Concordant Version).

What kind of words were those words, which The Word spoke back there in the garden? Why they were the words of Jesus, and Jesus plainly tells us that His words "ARE SPIRIT" (John 6:63).

Is it just me, but just as i stated in one of my earlier posts and with CIYs' post--

Quote
Speaking of John 1:1-5, when Ray spoke on the word "Grace" being "divine influence on the heart" and in his talk used the meaning in place of the word in several scriptures, it led me to do some studies likewise.  The following is one that really intrigues me and is very interesting to meditate upon.

According to Strong's the meaning of Word (logos) is "something spoken including the thought" so I will substitute that for the word "Word" and follow that thru:

In the beginning was the (something spoken including the thought), and the (something spoken including the thought) was with God, and the (something spoken including the thought) was God.
[Now the "something spoken including the thought" is God]

The (something spoken including the thought) was in the beginning with (something spoken including the thought).

All things were made by (something spoken including the thought); and without (something spoken including the thought) was not any thing made that was made.


Being predestined (something spoken including the thought) When the Word started creating/creation and since....

Quote
Jesus Christ is our Example of just how man (mankind) is to "be made into the Image of God." Jesus is our example, our way, and our destiny:
(Rays)

in this way doesnt it show how the Word was begotten and not created, but his physical, Jesus, was created.

Im will end this here because i know in this post my thoughts are everywhere because my niece and nephew keep interrupting in mid thought.

What do you guys think on this?

In Jesus,

Anthony

ps i didnt get to fully finish Reading Rays 12 Truths to Understanding Scripture again (i've read it before but its been awhile) before i posted this so i may be way off base,  If so im sorry.


Hi! Anthony

I will answer that long and inspired rendition with just two words "SPOT ON". Jesus the flesh was created. Christ/Word/Spirit/ Son of God whatever came forth from the Father, He was begotten. Born not created. "SPOT ON".

Much deeper thinking than I'm capable of, brother, but virtually identical. I applaud you. The main point being that the Word/Christ was begotten born not created. Christ the Son of God is worthy of worship, the CREATOR; a created Christ is a part of creation, a CREATURE. If we worship the created Christ we are worshiping the CREATURE and not the CREATOR. That is the whole point of my thread and it is of extreme importance to know what we are worshiping, don't you think?

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 24, 2008, 02:30:49 PM

Much deeper thinking than I'm capable of, brother, but virtually identical. I applaud you. The main point being that the Word/Christ was begotten born not created. Christ the Son of God is worthy of worship, the CREATOR; a created Christ is a part of creation, a CREATURE. If we worship the created Christ we are worshiping the CREATURE and not the CREATOR. That is the whole point of my thread and it is of extreme importance to know what we are worshiping, don't you think?



Hello Roy,

First off, thank you for your simpler, more direct post. I am a simple man who likes to get right to the meat of a discussion.

Second, nothing personal, but this is exactly where I thought this post was headed and why I recommended letting it die down. I understand your position through this entire discussion, but the idea of NOT worshipping Christ in any form or fashion does not sit well with me. And idea or theology that even hints at not worshipping Christ, in whatever form a person speaks of, is anti-Christ.

Whether you wish to say begotten or created, Christ did not come out of himself. He did not exist but through the Father. So the Father, not Christ himself, brought Him into existence. Begotten or created, it is still out of the Father.

And when you say 'a created Christ is part of creation' and we are not to worship, it seems to say we are not to worship Christ in the flesh since all flesh is created by God. But the apostles did throughout his ministry. If that is not what you mean to say, I apologize.

One last note, I have yet to see why this particular subject is of great spiritual importance. You state that is is, but how does this issue edify anyone in whether they state begotten or created? Does it make one more spiritually mature? Is this an issue that keeps one from being of the Elect? It's a matter of words and they both (begotten & created) state that Christ came out of the Father which are the very words that Christ said himself (John 16:27-28).

Hopefully, instead of more & more post about begotten & created, there can be at least one post that shows, if any, what the spiritual importance of using one word or the other. This really reminds me of doctrine debates & issues that Paul repeatedly tells us to avoid getting in a big huff about (Titus 3:9).


Thanks,

Marques
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 24, 2008, 02:33:45 PM
Adam and Eve were created, everyone else since then were born, does that mean we are not created? I am sorry I just cannot comprehend what the point is.  ???

Peace,

Joe
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 24, 2008, 02:35:16 PM
Great post Marques!

Joe
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 24, 2008, 02:54:17 PM
Roy, my overall impression of the paper was that Ray did what Trinity theorists don't do...that is he stuck with what scripture we have and didn't venture 'extra-biblically' to explain it.  Now..how can he, or you, or I 'explain' God?  We can find statements in scripture that describe certain characteristics of God, and teach/believe them as Truth.  But even the scriptures don't explain or define 'Spirit', tell us exactly HOW God created the Heavens and the Earth, what existed before it's creation, what the interaction and relationship of Spirit to the Physical is all about, how God will raise the dead, none of the characteristics of God.  When it comes to God, the scriptures themselves are parables.  Does the Father have hands, a face, a backside?  What is Spirit?  What is Love, even? 

So we have scripture that says the Son is both created and begotten.  Makes me feel a little like Peter after Jesus 'explained' a parable.  "Yes, Lord, I understand now."  Oh really?  I'm very sure that the Scriptures go deeper than I know now, but I'm convinced beyond being unconvinced that we cannot know now what those words really MEAN when it comes to God.  To Rays' credit, I think, he doesn't go where Angels fear to tread.  All language 'falls short of the Glory of God'.  All we have are symbols, because in the end, that's what words themselves are.

   


Hi! Dave in Tenn

Thanks for your input. But the truth of the matter is we don't have Scripture that specifically states that Christ was created. Now I'm not saying Jesus was not created, indeed, all flesh is created, initially that is part of the creation. Christ/Word is Spirit and the Word is Born of God. We are all born of God through our Lord Jesus Christ right now, not created."Jesus answered and said to him, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.' ”. It's there, brother, born again not created. We are created flesh but we are born again spirit.

Spirit is invisible, no one knows about the deep secrets of God. We can but speculate as to what was before the was anything and it all comes down to God. We are told He is light and that He created dankness, but we are not told who created light. But Light is pure energy, so we can again only assume that all things were created with His energy. And then stop giving ourselves an unnecessary headache.

But it is extremely important to know who and what we are worshiping, whether it is the Creator who created all things or the creature who created all things. One is true worship the other idolatry.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 24, 2008, 03:32:08 PM
Adam and Eve were created, everyone else since then were born, does that mean we are not created? I am sorry I just cannot comprehend what the point is.  ???

Peace,

Joe



Hi! Joe


I'm not denying the fact that all flesh is created, Jesus the man was created, we are told in Heb.10:5 that a body was prepared for Him. Christ/Word is Spirit and the Word was begotten, that is, born of God. The identical snapshot image of God, in short, the Son of God worthy of worship: "To Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever.” And the four living creatures kept saying, “Amen.” And the elders fell down and worshiped."  (Rev.5:13-14).

A very, very big difference Joe, between the two words when applied to Deity especially. We have just seen that the Word/Lamb/Jesus is worthy of worship, why because we are told specifically in several places that He is the begotten Son, born of God, the image of the Father with all the Father's character traits by right of inheritance; what we are not told specifically is that He was created by the Father and hence not entitled to be worshiped.

True worship is to worship the Father in Spirit in the name of His Son, the Creator; but to worship a created Christ is to worship a part of creation itself, a creature and not the Creator.  There is a difference and a big, big difference. "Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him."  (1Jn.5:1).


God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 24, 2008, 04:50:36 PM

Much deeper thinking than I'm capable of, brother, but virtually identical. I applaud you. The main point being that the Word/Christ was begotten born not created. Christ the Son of God is worthy of worship, the CREATOR; a created Christ is a part of creation, a CREATURE. If we worship the created Christ we are worshiping the CREATURE and not the CREATOR. That is the whole point of my thread and it is of extreme importance to know what we are worshiping, don't you think?



Hello Roy,

First off, thank you for your simpler, more direct post. I am a simple man who likes to get right to the meat of a discussion.

Second, nothing personal, but this is exactly where I thought this post was headed and why I recommended letting it die down. I understand your position through this entire discussion, but the idea of NOT worshipping Christ in any form or fashion does not sit well with me. And idea or theology that even hints at not worshipping Christ, in whatever form a person speaks of, is anti-Christ.

Whether you wish to say begotten or created, Christ did not come out of himself. He did not exist but through the Father. So the Father, not Christ himself, brought Him into existence. Begotten or created, it is still out of the Father.

And when you say 'a created Christ is part of creation' and we are not to worship, it seems to say we are not to worship Christ in the flesh since all flesh is created by God. But the apostles did throughout his ministry. If that is not what you mean to say, I apologize.

One last note, I have yet to see why this particular subject is of great spiritual importance. You state that is is, but how does this issue edify anyone in whether they state begotten or created? Does it make one more spiritually mature? Is this an issue that keeps one from being of the Elect? It's a matter of words and they both (begotten & created) state that Christ came out of the Father which are the very words that Christ said himself (John 16:27-28).

Hopefully, instead of more & more post about begotten & created, there can be at least one post that shows, if any, what the spiritual importance of using one word or the other. This really reminds me of doctrine debates & issues that Paul repeatedly tells us to avoid getting in a big huff about (Titus 3:9).


Thanks,

Marques


Hi! Marques

Thank you for your kind comments.

I will now attempt to answer the rest.

Your quote:
"Second, nothing personal, but this is exactly where I thought this post was headed and why I recommended letting it die down. I understand your position through this entire discussion, but the idea of NOT worshipping Christ in any form or fashion does not sit well with me. And idea or theology that even hints at not worshipping Christ, in whatever form a person speaks of, is anti-Christ."

My Reply: "But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law, for they are unprofitable and worthless."  (Titus 3:9). In what way, brother, is this discussion causing foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes? No one has got hot under the collar or fallen out or got nasty, we are after all seeking the truth and the truth can only be ascertained by careful and measured discussion, which this is. And far from it being unprofitable and worthless it is of great importance. We are commanded in the first commandment of God: “You shall have no other gods before Me. “You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me," (Ex.20:3-5).

Would you not say that a created christ is a part of the creation, a creature? If a creature then christ by name (false) but idol by intent. We are also told that many false christs and false prophets have gone out, would you accept any of these false christs and worship them?

This is the spirit of the antichrist "and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world. " (1Jn.4:3). Have I or anyone here confessed that Jesus is not the Son God? So in what way does it give an impression of the antichrist?

Brother I mean well, it is for our edification that I say these things not to cause discord or friction, believe me I'm being very sincere because I love you all and would do nothing to offend. Pray on it brother, I beg you, I can see a gap as wide as East is to West between the meaning of begotten and created when applied to God and Deity. It is a unique difference only applicable to the Son of God, Jesus Christ, our Creator and Saviour Lord, and I pray to God that you'll see it to.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     


 
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: AK4 on August 24, 2008, 06:01:19 PM
Quote
Hi! Anthony

I will answer that long and inspired rendition with just two words "SPOT ON". Jesus the flesh was created. Christ/Word/Spirit/ Son of God whatever came forth from the Father, He was begotten. Born not created. "SPOT ON".


LOL  :D  I knew it was getting long too when I was writing it and believe me, i wanted to keep going, but those dang kids, bless their hearts.

I agree their is a huge gap.  For all those who dont see a difference, think about why in all of Gods inspired Word that all the verses say He(Word) was BORN of God and it never states he was created.

I also agree with Roy about this thread.  We are seeking the Truth and we are doing it among like minded believers.  Isn't this better than discussing this with some other believers.  If you are seeing conflict in this thread (which i dont) imagine the conflict outside of us.  Imagine having this conversation with a catholic!!  (think about that one, get it) LOL  :D

Me personally, when i post something I am hoping that in some way i may be wrong that someone could show me to the Truth.  But that is why we should all back up everything we say with as many scriptures as possible.

In closing like Roy said we all mean well here and if someone doesnt Kat and Mods kicks him out

In Love,

Anthony

oh Marques im the same way the simplier the better.  I try to make everything simple because Gods i need his Word simplified to me also
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: mharrell08 on August 24, 2008, 07:40:53 PM
Hi! Marques

Thank you for your kind comments.

I will now attempt to answer the rest.

Your quote:
"Second, nothing personal, but this is exactly where I thought this post was headed and why I recommended letting it die down. I understand your position through this entire discussion, but the idea of NOT worshipping Christ in any form or fashion does not sit well with me. And idea or theology that even hints at not worshipping Christ, in whatever form a person speaks of, is anti-Christ."

My Reply: "But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law, for they are unprofitable and worthless."  (Titus 3:9). In what way, brother, is this discussion causing foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes? No one has got hot under the collar or fallen out or got nasty, we are after all seeking the truth and the truth can only be ascertained by careful and measured discussion, which this is. And far from it being unprofitable and worthless it is of great importance. We are commanded in the first commandment of God: “You shall have no other gods before Me. “You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me," (Ex.20:3-5).

Would you not say that a created christ is a part of the creation, a creature? If a creature then christ by name (false) but idol by intent. We are also told that many false christs and false prophets have gone out, would you accept any of these false christs and worship them?

This is the spirit of the antichrist "and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world. " (1Jn.4:3). Have I or anyone here confessed that Jesus is not the Son God? So in what way does it give an impression of the antichrist?

Brother I mean well, it is for our edification that I say these things not to cause discord or friction, believe me I'm being very sincere because I love you all and would do nothing to offend. Pray on it brother, I beg you, I can see a gap as wide as East is to West between the meaning of begotten and created when applied to God and Deity. It is a unique difference only applicable to the Son of God, Jesus Christ, our Creator and Saviour Lord, and I pray to God that you'll see it to.

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     



Hello Roy,

I understand the difference between begotten & created. But either way, Christ came out of the Father. He did not bring himself into existence.

If this is that big of an issue that you want to hold onto, go ahead. 5 pages of posts and still not one way how I or anyone else is spiritually edified from using one word or the other.

Personally, I don't care which word someone uses. As long as people understand Christ came out of the Father and not himself as Trinitarians believe, not a big deal for me. But to each his own.

I'm done...


Thanks,

Marques
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 25, 2008, 08:36:53 AM
Quote
Hi! Anthony

I will answer that long and inspired rendition with just two words "SPOT ON". Jesus the flesh was created. Christ/Word/Spirit/ Son of God whatever came forth from the Father, He was begotten. Born not created. "SPOT ON".


LOL  :D  I knew it was getting long too when I was writing it and believe me, i wanted to keep going, but those dang kids, bless their hearts.

I agree their is a huge gap.  For all those who dont see a difference, think about why in all of Gods inspired Word that all the verses say He(Word) was BORN of God and it never states he was created.

I also agree with Roy about this thread.  We are seeking the Truth and we are doing it among like minded believers.  Isn't this better than discussing this with some other believers.  If you are seeing conflict in this thread (which i dont) imagine the conflict outside of us.  Imagine having this conversation with a catholic!!  (think about that one, get it) LOL  :D

Me personally, when i post something I am hoping that in some way i may be wrong that someone could show me to the Truth.  But that is why we should all back up everything we say with as many scriptures as possible.

In closing like Roy said we all mean well here and if someone doesnt Kat and Mods kicks him out

In Love,

Anthony

oh Marques im the same way the simplier the better.  I try to make everything simple because Gods i need his Word simplified to me also


Hi! Anthony

Thank you my, brother, you indeed have been blessed with eyes to see and ears to hear. If only we realize that it is the integrity of God the Father's only begotten Son Jesus Christ's' Deity that is at stake in this discussion it would open their eyes. John 1 clearly starts with the heading in bold print, "The Deity Of Jesus Christ" and follows with "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being."  (Jn.1:1-3). How anyone can carefully read these words and misinterpret the meaning of this very clear Scripture is beyond my humble intellect.

Marques says, 5 pages of discussion on two simple words and still getting nowhere, little does he know that I have failed to keep my promise to pray for those on this forum due to this issue. Each time I start to pray my mind seems to get blocked off and this issue raises its head, as though God is refusing to listen to me. Why? I ask myself. Why? It never used to be this way, so something is definitely wrong. Marques has got the issue confused, trinitarianism is a belief in God The Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, three individual Gods in One God the word God becomes a family name for three independent identities of equal character traits. Whereas here we have just the ONE GOD the Father, Sovereign with a Son in His Image enclosed in His bosom. Still ONE Sovereign God, the Father. (Jn.1:18). "No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him." How much plainer can this be?     
 
All I know is that the Spirit is decidedly saying something to me and I have a very good idea what that is and will have to act accordingly. I see a strong delusion at work "For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false, in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness."   (2Thess.2:11-12).One cannot serve two masters. God and man. So I fear that I have a very lonely walk along that narrow road, on my own, ahead of me yet again.

I love everyone on this forum, including our much respected teacher, with a godly love, but I cannot forsake my First Love yet again. I have done it once and I will do it no more, whatever the outcome. I am a firm believer in the virtue of loyalty, but even loyalty has its priorities and mine start with God.

Thank you brother Anthony and brother Brian. Many are called but only a few are chosen.

God bless you brothers and sisters in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 25, 2008, 08:55:28 AM
Another thing...

If we are to praise Jesus, what would have been the point of Him introducing us to the Father?

Php 2:6  Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
 
Php 2:7  But made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men:
 
Php 2:8  And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
 
Php 2:9  Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a name which is above every name:
 
Php 2:10  That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things in earth and things under the earth;
 
Php 2:11  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

I believe this sums up the answer to your question Anthony, if we love, praise, follow and exalt Jesus Christ we are also doing the very same thing to His and our Father as they are of One Mind and One Spirit. When we worship Christ we are worshipping the Father who sent Him to us, Christ is the perfect Ambassador for God our Father.

Peace,

Joe



Hi! Joe

That is spot on. We worship the Father and the Father only but in doing so we also worship His Son Jesus Christ who is One in the Father. “In that day you will not question Me about anything. Truly, truly, I say to you, if you ask the Father for anything in My name, He will give it to you. Until now you have asked for nothing in My name; ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be made full." (Jn.16:23-24).

God bless you brother in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     
Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: Roy Monis on August 25, 2008, 09:09:09 AM

I think a little review of Ray's article 'Is God a Close Trinity or an Open Family' will help us get our bearings on this matter.


                               Who and What is GOD?

"There is ONE GOD, the FATHER, out of Whom ALL is..." (I Cor. 8:6).

"For there is ONE God" (I Tim. 2:5).

"You are my witnesses whether there is any god, any Power, any besides ME" (Isa. 44:8 Moffatt Translation).

"The ONE Who is operating ALL in accord with the counsel of HIS will..." (Eph. 1:11).

"Out of Him and through Him and for Him is ALL: to HIM be the glory for the eons! Amen!" (Rom. 11:36).

"...your heavenly Father IS PERFECT" (Mat. 5:48)

"God IS LOVE" (I John 4:08).

"God IS SPIRIT" (John 4:24).

"...the INVISIBLE GOD" (II Cor. 4:4).

"Now it is eonian life that they may know Thee, the ONLY TRUE GOD, and Him Whom Thou dost commission, Jesus Christ" (John 17:3).

Jesus called His Father "...the ONLY TRUE GOD" (Jn. 17:3).

"God is NOT A MAN..." (I Sam. 15:29).


                           Who and What is Jesus Christ?

Jesus Christ IS A MAN! "For there is ONE GOD, and ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind, A MAN, Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).

"Thou art the Christ, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD" (Mat. 16:16).

"Christ, Who is the IMAGE of the invisible God" (II Cor. 4:4).

"The Lord Jesus Christ, the SON OF THE FATHER" (II Jn 3).

"The BEGINNING of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14 JKV)

"God’s CREATIVE ORIGINAL" (Rev. 3:14 CLNT).

"If God were your Father, you would have loved Me. For OUT OF GOD I CAME FORTH and am arriving" (John 8:42).

"Nor Jesus said to him, Why are you terming Me good? No one is good except ONE, GOD" (Mark 10:18).

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward God, and God was the Word" (John 1:1). (This is the proper order of the Greek words. Jesus is the Logos or Spokesman of God).

I believe most can see from the above Scriptures that there are numerous and fundamental differences between the Father and Jesus the Son. However, there are still reasons to ask whether or not Jesus Christ, the Son of God the Father, is not also "God?"  Is Christ for example, not worthy our worship? Dare we worship any but "God?" And if Christ is indeed "God," when isn’t He of the very same status, rank, authority, etc., as His Father? Good questions. Let’s take them one at a time.

Is Christ God? YES HE IS!

"Yet to the Son [this is GOD speaking]: ‘Thy throne, O GOD, is for the eon of the eon..." (Heb. 1:08).

And also:

Who [Jesus], being inherently in the form of God, deems it not pillaging [taking by force or plundering] to be EQUAL WITH GOD" (Phil. 2:6).

Is Christ worthy of worship? YES HE IS !

"And lo! A leper, coming to Him, WORSHIPED Him, saying..." (Mat. 8:2),

"lo! One approaching Him [Jesus], a chief, WORSHIPED Him..." (Mat. 9:18),

"Now those in the ship WORSHIP Him, saying, ‘truly, God’s Son art Thou!’"

"Yet she, coming, WORSHIPS Him, saying, ‘Lord, help me!’" (Mat. 15:25).

So Christ is called "God," and did not consider it pillaging to be "equal" with God, and was often "worshiped." So surely, even if Christ is not the third person of a trinity, He must at least be the second person of a duet! SURELY, HE IS NOT! Let me explain.

Jesus IS God! True, but this fact does NOT make Him the FATHER! Let us always read and believe the Scriptures. The English word "God" is translated from the Greek word Theos which means PLACER or DISPOSER. ANYONE to whom the Father gives such an office of "placer or disposer" is a God! Notice what God says in Psalm 82:6,

"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High."

Jesus explains this verse for us:

"Jesus answered them, ‘Is it not written in your law, that ‘I say you are gods’? If He said those were gods, to whom the word of God came [and the scripture can not be annulled], are you saying to Him Whom the Father hallows and dispatches into the world that You are blaspheming,’ seeing that I said, ‘Son of God am I’? If I am not doing My Father’s works, do not believe Me. Yet if I am doing them, and if ever you are not believing Me, be believing the works, that you may be knowing and believing that in Me is the Father, and I am in the Father."

Okay then, let’s notice a few very important points. Jesus never came out and said "I AM GOD!" He always called Himself, "The Son OF God." Recall that Jesus did not consider it "pillaging" to be equal with God. That is, he didn’t need to steal, or take His office by FORCE, because His God, the Father, GAVE ALL THINGS TO HIM FREELY! Though Jesus is certainly "God," we must always remember that everything that made Him "God" (like His Father), WAS GIVEN TO HIM! Is there anyone who would suggest that someone GAVE God the Father all that He possesses? I think not. There is clearly a distinction--we have a "Father" and a "Son," NOT two equal Gods of a so-called trinity.
http://bible-truths.com/trinity.html
----------------------------------------------------------

mercy, peace and love
Kat




Hi! Kathy

How do we equate this statement "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was toward God, and God was the Word" (John 1:1). (This is the proper order of the Greek words. Jesus is the Logos or Spokesman of God).  in which the Father is obviously the Word with "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth."  (Jn.1:14). This makes Jesus Christ the Father how can this be?

And even if it does work out it still doesn't prove that the Word which was from the beginning with God, was created by Him.

God bless you sister in our joint walk in Christ. 

Love in Christ Jesus.

Roy UK     


Title: Re: John 1:1-5
Post by: hillsbororiver on August 25, 2008, 09:18:55 AM
Roy can have the last word on the topic and we can agree to disagree as to the significance of this. When threads begin to repeat themselves it is time to move on.....

Peace,

Joe