Hi
this is quiet a solemn topic.
So I’ll be very brief and let you think on what I am saying.
The reason this is so important is because it is so simple and sublime. It is profound and earth shattering.
This will give you such a sword in you hand that it will destroy the foundations of any false teacher who opposes the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ as taught to us by Apostle Paul, Ray Smith, et. Al.
What I am presenting you brothers and sisters is a tool, is a theorem, is an axiom. It is more presuppositional then Van-Tillian Apologetics.
It is more simple than the simplest of the truths.
Now, I want you guys and gals to pray. Pray with me and let our Good Spirit of our Lord Jesus Christ teach us.
Let our Holy Spirit of God even teach us so much, so that even this what I present now will be refined with fire….
Oh Holy Ghost of our Lord JESUS CHRIST. Please teach us
In JESUS name
Amen
Since this topic is so deep, I will not use any formal system of logical symbols. I will quote only a article by Douglas Hofstadter who is the Pulitzer-prizewinning author of Gödel, Escher, Bach
It came out in March 1999 in the time magazine.
I WILL NOT PRESENT THE IMPLICATIONS RIGHT NOW. I WANT YOU GUYS TO CHEW THE ARTICLE AND DIGEST IT FOR SOME TIME BEFORE I PRESENT THE IMPLICATIONS.
MY THE GOOD SPIRIT WHO TAUGHT OUR DEAR BROTHER RAY SMITH TEACH US FURTHER.
Kurt Gödel was born in 1906 in Brunn, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and now part of the Czech Republic, to a father who owned a textile factory and had a fondness for logic and reason and a mother who believed in starting her son's education early. By age 10, Gödel was studying math, religion and several languages. By 25 he had produced what many consider the most important result of 20th century mathematics: his famous "incompleteness theorem." Gödel's astonishing and disorienting discovery, published in 1931, proved that nearly a century of effort by the world's greatest mathematicians was doomed to failure.
To appreciate Gödel's theorem, it is crucial to understand how mathematics was perceived at the time. After many centuries of being a typically sloppy human mishmash in which vague intuitions and precise logic coexisted on equal terms, mathematics at the end of the 19th century was finally being shaped up. So-called formal systems were devised (the prime example being Russell and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica) in which theorems, following strict rules of inference, sprout from axioms like limbs from a tree. This process of theorem sprouting had to start somewhere, and that is where the axioms came in: they were the primordial seeds, the Ur-theorems from which all others sprang.
The beauty of this mechanistic vision of mathematics was that it eliminated all need for thought or judgment. As long as the axioms were true statements and as long as the rules of inference were truth preserving, mathematics could not be derailed; falsehoods simply could never creep in. Truth was an automatic hereditary property of theoremhood.
The set of symbols in which statements in formal systems were written generally included, for the sake of clarity, standard numerals, plus signs, parentheses and so forth, but they were not a necessary feature; statements could equally well be built out of icons representing plums, bananas, apples and oranges, or any utterly arbitrary set of chicken scratches, as long as a given chicken scratch always turned up in the proper places and only in such proper places. Mathematical statements in such systems were, it then became apparent, merely precisely structured patterns made up of arbitrary symbols.
Soon it dawned on a few insightful souls, Gödel foremost among them, that this way of looking at things opened up a brand-new branch of mathematics — namely, metamathematics. The familiar methods of mathematical analysis could be brought to bear on the very pattern-sprouting processes that formed the essence of formal systems — of which mathematics itself was supposed to be the primary example. Thus mathematics twists back on itself, like a self-eating snake.