Hi all,
Something has bothered me from time to time and maybe one of you all can explain.
In Matthew 24, there is a lot about very visible troubles if they are literal. For example, "You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. These things must happen, but the end is still to come. 7Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places." And then there's this: "How miserable those days will be for pregnant and nursing mothers! 20Pray that your flight will not occur in the winter or on the Sabbath. 21 For at that time there will be great tribulation,unmatched from the beginning of the world until now, and never to be seen again. 22If those days had not been cut short, nobody would be saved. But for the sake of the elect, those days will be cut short."
Now, given all these things that would presumably not being done in a corner and have the whole world on edge. How then can we have this: "As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. 39And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man." So, how can they be oblivious of the above events such that they are marrying and are given in marriage. It seems like it's hard to be oblivious to events that are rocking the world to such an extent that you're like yeah let's get married next week.
Thanks,
Josh
Hi Josh. There's a bit to unpack in your post, so bear with me if you want.
To my mind it doesn't much matter if these "things" you quoted--You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. These things must happen, but the end is still to come. 7
Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places...--are "literal" or "spiritual". What they ARE are general conditions which may happen any time and are NOT specific to "the end". Indeed. if there is anything specific to "the end" in those portions is that "men will come saying". I guarantee you, THAT prophecy has been extremely well fulfilled.
The other portions you referenced have, I believe, a more specific reference. Many people believe these "sayings" were fulfilled in 70 AD. There is certainly some truth in that. The sacking of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple marked the absolute end of the "Old Covenant" with sacrifices, even though the "New Covenant" began at His crucifixion--the new covenant in His blood. And this is where some spiritual discernment needs to take place, because the words of Jesus ARE Spirit! There are still people following an (at least modified version of the) Old Covenant. And, for them, this "destruction" and "tribulation" is yet to be realized in their own lives, or perhaps is underway and not yet complete.
Ray put it this way: Preterists reject the future. Futurists reject the past. Both positions reject the present.
And I reject the notion that the "literal" isn't Spiritual and that the "Spiritual" isn't real. Indeed, ONLY the Spiritual is REAL, no matter a damn what's happening in the physical, or literal, or in so-called IRL.
On to Noah.
I don't doubt that there were some "wicked" mixed in with the population that was swept away. But the "evil" that was always and only on the people's minds continually was that use of "evil" which has no moral bias. I've lived that life, and probably you have too--or at least tasted it.
H7451
רעה / רע
ra‛ / râ‛âh
BDB Definition:
1) bad, evil (adjective)
1a) bad, disagreeable, malignant
1b) bad, unpleasant, evil (giving pain, unhappiness, misery)
1c) evil, displeasing
1d) bad (of its kind - land, water, etc)
1e) bad (of value)
1f) worse than, worst (comparison)
1g) sad, unhappy
1h) evil (hurtful)
1i) bad, unkind (vicious in disposition)
1j) bad, evil, wicked (ethically)
1j1) in general, of persons, of thoughts
1j2) deeds, actions
2) evil, distress, misery, injury, calamity (noun masculine)
2a) evil, distress, adversity
2b) evil, injury, wrong
2c) evil (ethical)
3) evil, misery, distress, injury (noun feminine)
3a) evil, misery, distress
3b) evil, injury, wrong
3c) evil (ethical)
ra‛ râ‛âh
rah, raw-aw'
From H7489; bad or (as noun) evil (naturally or morally). This includes the second (feminine) form; as adjective or noun: - adversity, affliction, bad, calamity, + displease (-ure), distress, evil ([-favouredness], man, thing), + exceedingly, X great, grief (-vous), harm, heavy, hurt (-ful), ill (favoured), + mark, mischief, (-vous), misery, naught (-ty), noisome, + not please, sad (-ly), sore, sorrow, trouble, vex, wicked (-ly, -ness, one), worse (-st) wretchedness, wrong. [Including feminine ra’ah; as adjective or noun.]
Total KJV occurrences: 664
So here's a big little thought. SPIRITUALLY, the flood represents the Judgement on the world, which is only and always thinking about "evil" and all that brings about. We believe that this "judgement" on the world is a good thing FOR the world. For if the whole world is to be saved, can you think of a better list of things to be saved FROM than what populates that definition? What a glorious day it is and was and will be when the light of this glorious gospel shines on the world and His Spirit is poured out on all flesh.
If that's the case, then I think what you said about "the Days of Noah" is the right approach to understanding. They's just folks, doing their things. They have some inner inkling that things could be "different", but "many have come saying..." and snatched even that away.
And THAT stuff's been going on since forever ago, no matter what current events they were watching on TV or how much history was in their vellum text-books.
I probably didn't answer your question directly, but maybe these tangential thoughts can help.