> Email to Ray

Darwin

<< < (2/5) > >>

Falconn003:
eutychus

In all that post i could not find one fact, not one certaintanty, nor one absolute.

as you yourself stated and which i am in agreement with:


--- Quote ---((((Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions. ))))))))
--- End quote ---



These words just jump out and send up red flags at my understanding. See if it does not send up red flags for you......well maybe not since you posted this in suport of your perspective.


--- Quote ---In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from an enormously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The Big Bang theory is based on the observed Hubble's law redshift of distant galaxies that when taken together with the cosmological principle indicate that space is expanding according to the Friedmann-Lemaître model of general relativity. Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity (for reporting on some of the more notable speculation on this issue, see cosmogony).

The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (Hubble's law) began — calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago (±2%) — and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory [1].

One consequence of the Big Bang is that the conditions of today's universe are different from the conditions in the past or in the future. From this model, George Gamow in 1948 was able to predict, at least qualitatively, the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) [2]. The CMB was discovered in the 1960s and further validated the Big Bang theory over its chief rival, the steady state theory.
--- End quote ---
(((If a theory is validated it is NO LONGER A THEORY !!!)))

Though in all due respect to your perspective and understanding Chuck, and with a little relucntancy in my part to thank you for sharing that bit with us.

This big bang THEORY is in and of itself no respect to my FAITH.

Not all that glitters is gold or facts, yet they can make it look so close to it but as awlways they fall short.((( ala...fools gold, decieving truth)))

I now just see it diferently, back in the past you might have gotten a "HERE,HERE" from me, now in my spiritual growth i dare not contemplate that line of thinking, tis all..........

Rodger

Falconn003:
Chuck

In asking for a thoery on how God created all creation, you are asking a loaded question.

Given you the benefit of the doubt, i would hope you are after an expectation we are not gonna indulge you with.....

Seems the emailer's sarcasm is truth unto himself that which he desires as truth and nothing else will suffice.

What then is his fate, i believe what scripture says "it better for Sodom and Gomorrah "  then his refute of the Holy Spirit.  Poor sap hasn't a clue to his origin and his line of ignorance can only be so tolerated.

Rodger

eutychus:

--- Quote from: bobbys43 ---Theory???????? :shock:  [-X

For nothing is impossible with God!!!!!!!

bobby
--- End quote ---


now why you gotta shake your finger at me friend?


(((For nothing is impossible with God)))))


 did anything i say go against this scripture???


  let there be light(BANG) there was light :P

YellowStone:

--- Quote from: eutychus ---i have a problem with darwin and evolution but not with the big bang .

 intellegent design can go hand in hadn with the big bang,  for me anyway.

((((Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions. ))))))))

--- End quote ---


You're so right! :)

I think the number one question that seems to be ALWAYS over-lookedn and that is the "where." Sure, I have heard the theories that explain how the whole universe was compressed into something smaller than an atom; but where did the "where" come from. In order to have a "bang" there must be the object that goes "bang" and a location. Where did the location come from that allows the universe to form and continually expand.

The Big-bang theoolgists cannot explain this one.

Falconn003:
Funny when i enter a room and think let there be light i hear a click of the light switch.  hmmmmmmm......no big bang.....must be broken huh  :wink:

Rodger

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page