Baptism

[Craig]

> If I understood what I have read what you wrote, you say that a water
> baptisim isn't needed, since it's of the flesh. So why then did Jesus and
> the deciples have it done if it wasn't needed?


Dear Adam:

I will write a paper on this one day, but not today.

Jesus was also circumcised in the flesh, and you know what Paul said

about THAT, don't you?  Baptism and circumcision picture victurally

the same thing--dying to to the flesh and 'THINGS' OF the flesh--like

rituals, and ceromonies and religious 'services,' etc.

God be with you,

Ray