> General Discussions

Questioning Paul

<< < (3/6) > >>

Akira329:
oh ok! I'm glad ;D
Antaiwan

cjwood:
bottom line is this. do we really think that God, Who inspired ALL scripture, would have had letters of paul included in His Divine Word if paul was not credible. the person you were having an internet conversation with is, well, a bone-head.

claudia

eggi:
Nonsense! Aren't the words that Jesus spoke to Paul on the road to Damascus also Christs words? If we cannot believe any post-resurrection records, than we can't know if Christ is resurrected, and our faith is in vain. I don't see that he has any point at all. God bless you, Eirik

Dave in Tenn:
I wouldn't understand or know very much at all if it wasn't for Paul, and those who teach him. 

If your internet contact believes he can follow the teachings of Jesus in the Gospels, then more power to him.  It's Paul who 'lived the life' and informs us what it means to be alive in the Spirit while still being 'meat' and under the influence of sin.  We don't have a closer bother in fellowship, to my mind. 

Some of the scattered 'objections' to Paul I've encountered over the years are from more 'libertine' sources.  I don't believe many who 'contrast' Christ's message and Paul's Teaching have ever actually READ (nor do they understand) Christ's teachings, just soft Sunday School platitudes.

Marlene:
I so, agree with you Dave. I could not have put that better.

In His Love,
Marlene

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page