> General Discussions

understand

<< < (6/8) > >>

gmik:
Thanks Joe.

What I see, too, is that it seems a lot of these people DO NOT read his teachings.  They must go straight to the e mails and just find controversial (to them) categories. Tickling ears if you will.

Then they can justify their disbelieving by, "well, he didn't answer w/ the spirit of love".

But you are so right Joe, those who have honest questions get a sincere reply.

I just wish people would READ HIS PAPERS!!!!!!!!!!

seminole:
That e-mail from Megan didn't help me much personally. She seemed to be sincere and respectful and didn't recieve the same back. Ray should know that most don't him aside from his tone and responses.

hillsbororiver:
Hi Nole,

What would your reply have been? Would you please give us an example?

His Peace to you,

Joe

P.S. Keep in mind that Megen did not read much if any of the material on Bible Truths but appeared to go directly to the e-mails (Gena perceived this as well). Does reading some random e-mails qualify one to make such a profound judgment? Look at Ray's invitation to her at the bottom of the page, does this seem insincere and disrespectful? 

seminole:
Yeah, it did seem more respectful that last part did. I know you can't take a random e-mail here and there and come down on someone. Sometimes the tone of the writing gets me mixed up. There is some good stuff there and then I read something that makes my spirit feel bad. I imagine if you took everybody there wouldn't be 100% total agreement because we are human. I still can't reconcile the talk about other people as being building up the kingdom of God.
Nole

LittleBear:
Personally, I didn't think Ray was harsh or disrespectful, but he did go straight to the point in order to get his point across. It's his way.
Sometimes we need that.

Ursula

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page