> General Discussions
"Types"
lilitalienboi16:
Yes greg, it is the 'ambiguous' wording, that is causing the confusion.
I believe that we are both in agreement.
Perhaps i should have been a bit more clear in that, i apoligize for the confusion. I do agree that adam did lust after eve but i don't think any harm or injustice is done to say that he also loved her the way all carnal beings would love there significant other. It most surely isn't perfect, and it is definatly tainted by lustful and sexual desires, but nonetheless i don't think it would make it any less true to say that he loved her, instead of he lusted after her.
I see your point though. Good eyes!
I think ill replace the word LOVE there, for LUST, just so this confusion doesn't happen again, perhaps with a different audience.
God bless greg and thanks for the imput!
Love to you,
Alex
ez2u:
Evie is Christ too a part that many church doctrine does not support but if you look at Proverbs 31 you will see the very nature of Christ in the virtuous woman. To say Christ was female also will make some to cover their ears and scream but as I studied the words He is both These are positions female and male of the very nature of God. People flow in and out of them. this is a deep thought like erternal salvation for all. As long as we think one species is not cable of grasping Christ as well as the other we will not be able to walk in The Kingdom of Christ Peggy
LittleBear:
Hi Peggy, :)
Did you read the new transcript Kat posted by Ray; Esther-the Destiny of Women? It's pretty encouraging.
Ursula :)
ez2u:
Ursula yes i have I do not receive the teaching of the church on this subject. The holy Spirit has been showing me in scriptures and by His illumination of those scriptures that these are positions female and male not what body parts you have. In Christ there is neither male nor female. The Holy Spirit began to draw me out of the worlds thinking which is all over and especially bad in the middle east right now but was not so always. I posted about this in general discussion thank you peggy
sonofone:
Hi,Peggy,I asked Dianne to start a post on this issue on last week and now see that you have started a post on this today. I know that you laid out a pretty in depth post of this issue and asked people to think before posting a response,so I have not responded to it as of yet. I would love for you to break your understanding down in laymans terms so that I could feel free to give my input.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version